Skip to main content

Wearing gender and sexuality “On your sleeve”: Dress norms and the importance of occupational and organizational culture at work

Abstract

Gender scholars have long argued that workplace culture is an important key to understanding how informal norms create, maintain, and sometimes undermine gender and sexual inequality at work. Although most studies have defined workplace culture as occupational culture, less emphasis has been placed on the importance of organizational culture. This article addresses the importance of both aspects of workplace culture by examining the occupational and organizational dress and appearance norms of men and women who work as editors and accountants at a heterosexual men's pornographic magazine and at a feminist magazine. This comparative case study demonstrates that workers face different expectations about the appropriate split between “personal” and work identities, depending on what they do and where they work. These informal, unwritten occupational and organizational norms play a large part in workers' definitions of appropriate and inappropriate expressions of gender and sexuality at work and should be attended to more carefully in attempts to achieve equality for men and women in all workplaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Acker, Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations”. Gender & Society 4: 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992. “Gendering Organizational Theory”. In Albert J. Mills and Peta Tancred (Eds.), Gendering Organizational Analysis (pp. 248–260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, Lisa. 1995. Gendered Work: Sexuality, Family, and the Labour Market. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Anne. 1994. Nightwork: Sexuality, Pleasure, and Corporate Masculinity in a Tokyo Hostess Club. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, Dana. Forthcoming. At Work in the Iron Cage: The Prison as a Gendered Organization. New York: New York University Press.

  • —. 1997. “Gendered Organizational Logic: Policy and Practice in Men's and Women's Prisons”. Gender & Society 11(6): 796–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, Gibson, and Jeff Hearn. 1989. “The Sexuality of Organization”. In Jeff Hearn, Albert J. Mills, and Peta Tancred (Eds.), The Sexuality of Organization (pp. 1–28). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Femininity and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, Joan. 1998. The Woman in the Surgeon's Body. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. 1981. Women in Law. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992. “Tinkerbells and pinups: The construction and reconstruction of gender boundaries at work”. In Michele Lamont and Marcel Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality (pp. 232–256). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, Silvia. 1995. Gender, Symbolism, and Organizational Cultures. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuffre, Patti A. and Christine L. Williams. 1994. “Boundary lines: Labeling sexual harassment in restaurants”. Gender & Society. 8(3): 378–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000. “Not Just Bodies: Strategies for Desexualizing the Physical Examination of Patients”. Gender & Society 14 (3): 457–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, Barbara A. 1985. Sex and the Workplace: Impact of Sexual Behavior and Harassment on Women, Men, and Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Elaine J. 1993. “Smiling, deferring and flirting: Doing gender by giving ‘good service”. Work and Occupations 20 (4): 425–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, Jeff and Wendy Parkin. 1987. “Sex” at “Work”: The Power and Paradox of Organization Sexuality. New York. St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, Anne. 1995. Sex and Suits. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Duncan. 1993. Sexy Dressing Etc. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidner, Robin. 1993. Fast Food. Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loe, Meika. 1996. “Working for Men: At the Intersection of Power, Gender, and Sexuality”. Sociological Inquiry 66: 399–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. and L. H. Lofland. 1984. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Patricia Yancey. 2001. “‘Mobilizing Masculinities’: Women's Experiences of Men at Work”. Organization 8(4): 587–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, Elliot G. 1986. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, Jennifer L. 1995. Gender Trials: Emotional Lives in Contemporary Law Firms. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, Rosemary. 1989. Secretaries Talk: Sexuality, Power, and Work. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. “Male secretaries”. In Christine L. Williams (Ed.), Doing “Women's Work”: Men in Nontraditional Occupations (pp. 128–151) Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, Barbara F. and Irene Padavic. 1994. Women and Men at Work. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzinger, Leslie. 2000. “Manufacturing Sexual Subjects: ‘Harassment,’ Desire and Discipline on a Maquiladora Shopfloor”. Ethnography 1: 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, Judith and Barrie Thorne. 1985. “The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology”. Social Problems 32: 301–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trice, Harrison M. 1993. Occupational Subcultures in the Workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, Sandy. 1999. “Gender and Sexual Harassment”. Annual Review of Sociology 25: 169–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Christine, L. 1989. Gender Differences at Work: Men and Women in Non-Traditional Occupations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. “Case studies and the sociology of gender”. In Joe R. Feagin, Anthony M. Orum, and Gideon Sjoberg (Eds.), A Case for the Case Study (pp. 224–243). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1995. Still a Man's World: Men Who Do Women's Work. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1997. “Sexual Harassment in Organizations: A Critique of Current Research and Policy”. Sexuality & Culture 1: 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Christine L. and Dana M. Britton. 1995. “Sexuality and Work”. In Craig Calhoun and George Ritzer (Eds.), Introduction to Social Problems (23 pp.). New York: McGraw-Hill Primis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, James D. with Jay H. Lucas. 1993. The Corporate Closet: The Professional Lives of Gay Men in America. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Kirsten Dellinger is an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Mississippi. Her research focuses on gender and sexuality in the workplace. She has published on organizational culture and sexual harassment (Social Problems, 2002), organizational sexuality (American Review of Sociology, 1999), and make-up at work (Gender & Society, 1997).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dellinger, K. Wearing gender and sexuality “On your sleeve”: Dress norms and the importance of occupational and organizational culture at work. Gend. Issues 20, 3–25 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-002-0005-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-002-0005-5

Keywords