Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Socioeconomic determinants of the intra-family status of wives in rural India: Analysis and empirical evidence

  • Articles
  • Published:
Gender Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relying on a structured survey of 117 wives in four rural villages in the Midnapore District of West Bengal, this article investigates the influence on the intra-family status of wives of variables that may increase the bargaining power of wives in their family. Saveral indicators of status are considered and investigated using the ANOVA technique and probit analysis. The main hypothesis considered is whether the results support bargaining theories of the intra-household status of wives or the view that gender status is primarily determined in Indian society by social customs and the patriarchal structure of society. Given the overall patriarchal structure of Indian society, the results indicate that bargaining theories are at best only marginally relevant. Situations that result in greater bargaining power for wives in Western societies do not necessarily do so in north India given the total pervasiveness of its patriarchal society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, B. 1994. A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnihotri, S., R. Palmer-Jones, and A. Parikh. 1998. Missing Women in India Districts and Entitlements Approach. Economics Research Centre, University of East Anglia. Norwich, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S. and A. Sen. 1995. Gender Inequality in Human Development: Theories and Measurement. HDR Office Occasional Paper, No. 19, UNDP, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. 1982. “Perspectives on Family and Fertility in Developing Countries.” Population Studies, 36, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M., S. R. Khanam, and S. Nahar. 1979. “Class, Patriarchy and Women's Work in Bangladesh.” Population and Development Review, 5, 405–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, G. H. 1979. “Cultural Determinants of Power for Women within the Family: A Neglected Aspect of Family Research,” Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 10, 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, T. and M. Moore. 1993. “On Kinship Structure, Female Autonomy and Demographic Behaviour in India.” Population and Development Review, 8, 35–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. 1984. “Household Production in the Philippines: A Non-Neoclassical Approach.” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 32, 303–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. 1993. “Entitlements Analysis: Relating Concepts and Contexts.” Development and Change, 24, 697–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, L. 1981. Profiles in Female Poverty: A Study of Five Poor Working Women in Kerala. Delhi: Hindustan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, L., J. Hoddinott, and H. Alderman. 1997. Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, H.I. 1976. “Capitalism, Patriarchy and Job Segregation by Sex.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1, 137–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, K. C. and C. A. Tisdell. 2001. “Property Rights in Women's Empowerment in Rural India: A Review.” International Journal of Social Economics (forthcoming).

  • Sen, A. 1990. Gender and Cooperative Conflicts, In I. Tinker (Ed.), Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development (pp. 123–144). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1977. “Starvation and Exchange Entitlements: A General Approach and its Application to the Great Bengal Famine.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1, 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M. 1985. “Caste, Class and Gender: Production and Reproduction in North India.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 12(4).

  • Tisdell, C. 2001. “Gender Inequality in India: Evidence from a Survey in Rural Bengal.” International Journal of Social Economics (in press).

  • —, Roy, K., and A. Ghose. 1999. “Sen's Theory of Entitlement and the Deprivation of Females: An Assessment with Indian Illustrations.” Social Economics, Policy and Development. Working Paper No. 2, Department of Economics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2001. “A Critical Note on UNDP's Gender Inequality Indices.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 31, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics, University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, Australia

    Clem Tisdell (professor) & Kartik Roy (professor)

  2. Ministry of Finance for His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Nepal

    Gopal Regmi

Authors
  1. Clem Tisdell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kartik Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gopal Regmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Research for this paper benefited from a grant by the Australian Research Committee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tisdell, C., Roy, K. & Regmi, G. Socioeconomic determinants of the intra-family status of wives in rural India: Analysis and empirical evidence. Gend. Issues 19, 41–60 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-001-0010-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-001-0010-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation