Gender Issues

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 3–18 | Cite as

Men, women, and sexual harassment in the U.S. military

Previously announced
  • Heather Antecol
  • Deborah Cobb-Clark
Articles

Abstract

In a 1995 U.S. Department of Defense survey of active-duty men and women in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard, 70.9 percent of female personnel and 35.8 percent of male personnel said that they had experienced sexually harassing behavior(s) in the previous 12 months. Furthermore, military personnel experiencing sexual harassment reported lower levels of overall job satisfaction and were more likely to report that they intend to leave the military.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Department of Defense News Briefing by Edwin Dorn, USD, Personnel and Readiness, held on July 2, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. Fitzgerald, Louise F., Fritz Drasgow, Charles L. Hulin, Michele J. Gelfand, and Vicki J. Magley. 1997. “Antecedents and Consequence of Sexual Harassment in Organizations: A Test of an Integrated Model.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), pp. 578–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fitzgerald, Louise F., Vicki J. Magley, Fritz Drasgow, and Craig R. Waldo. 1999. “Measuring Sexual Harassment in the Military: The Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ-DoD).” Military Psychology, 11(3), pp. 247–263.Google Scholar
  4. Fitzgerald, Louise F., Fritz Drasgow, and Vicki J. Magley. 1999. “Sexual Harassment in the Armed Forces: A Test of an Integrated Model.” Military Psychology, 11(3), pp. 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hay, Mary Sue and Timothy W. Elig. 1999. “The 1995 Department of Defense Sexual Harassment Survey: Overview and Methodology.” Military psychology, 11(3), pp. 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Laband, David N. and Bernard F. Lentz. 1998. “The Effects of Sexual Harassment on Job Satisfaction, Earnings, and Turnover Among Female Lawyers.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 51(4), pp. 594–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Magley, Vicki J. 1995. “Labeling Sexually Harassing Behaviors as Sexual Harassment.” in Louise F. Fitzgerald, chair, Emerging Issues in Sexual Harassment Research. Symposium conducted at the Association for Women in Psychology Indianapolis, IN as cited in Schneider, Swan, Fitzgerald, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. O'Donohue, William (editor). 1997. Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  9. Schneider, Kimberly T., Suzanne Swan, and Louise F. Fitzgerald. 1997. “Job-Related and Psychological Effects of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Empirical Evidence from Two Organizations.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), pp. 401–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Towell, Pat. (1997). “Study Finds Sexual Harassment Exists Throughout the Army.” Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 55(36), pp. 2162.Google Scholar
  11. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). 1995. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Work-place: Trends. Progress, Continuing Challenges. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Translation Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather Antecol
    • 1
  • Deborah Cobb-Clark
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsIllinois State UniversityNormal
  2. 2.National Centre for Development Studies and Economics Program, Research School of Social SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations