Today’s geodetic community starts to model an accurate gravimetric geoid within a 5 mm level, which entirely meets the demands of all technical and geoscientific studies. In this context, a wide range of geoid modelling methods have been published through the years, each of them has its own philosophy. Recently, a new geoid modelling technique has been developed by using the least squares modification of Hotine’s formula (LSMH), which gives more reasonable results than other methods. However, a practical and compact software package is not publicly accessible for researchers in this method. Thus, a scientific software package named “LSMHSOFT” is developed by C programming language and made available for public use in this study. Subsequently, the software is employed for the composition of gravimetric geoid in the Auvergne test-bed, verifying it by GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems)-levelling data. Numerical results indicate that LSMHSOFT is a powerful tool for modelling gravimetric geoid by the least squares modification of Hotine’s formula and its additive corrections.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The present software is developed in C programming language, which is freely available under the license of GNU public. Interested readers can find the software together with experimental data from github/aabbak/LSMHSOFT. Inquiries and bug reports about the software are cordially welcome to the authors.
Abbak RA (2014) Effect of ASTER DEM on the prediction of mean gravity anomalies: a case study over the Auvergne test region. Acta Geodeatica Geophysica 49:491–502
Abbak RA (2020) Effect of a high-resolution global crustal model on gravimetric geoid determination: a case study in a mountainous region. Stud Geophys Geod 64:436–451
Abbak RA, Erol B, Ustun A (2012a) Comparison of the KTH and remove-compute-restore techniques to geoid modelling in a mountainous area. Computers & Geosciences 48:31–40
Abbak RA, Sjoberg LE, Ellmann A, Ustun A (2012b) A precise gravimetric geoid model in mountainous areas with scarce gravity data – A case study in central Turkey. Stud Geophys Geod 56(4):909–927
Abbak RA, Ustun A (2015) A software package for computing a regional gravimetric geoid model by the KTH method. Earth Science Informatics 8:255–265
Akyilmaz O, Ustun A, Aydin C, Arslan N, Doganalp S, Guney C, Mercan H, Uygur SO, Uz M, Yagci O (2016) High resolution gravity field modelling and tracking regional mass by means of low Earth orbit satellites. Technical report, Technical University of Istanbul. Project number: 113Y155
Bildirici IO, Ustun A, Ulugtekin NN, Selvi HZ, Abbak RA, Bugdayci I, Dogru AO (2008) Comparison Of SRTM And 25K topographic maps in Turkey. In: Second International Conference on Cartography and GIS. Borovets, Bulgaria, pp 1–9
Duquenne H (2007) A data set to geoid computations methods. Harita Dergisi. Special Issue: 61–65
Ellmann A (2005) Computation of three stochastic modifications of Stokes’ formula for regional geoid determination. Computers and Geoscience 31(/6):742–755
Ellmann A, Sjöberg LE (2004) Ellipsoidal correction for the modified Stokes’ formula. Boll Geod Sci Aff 63:3
Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, Crippen R, Duren R, Hensley S, Kobrick M, Paller M, Rodriguez E, Roth L, Seal D, Shaffer S, Shimada J, Jeffrey J, Werner M, Oskin M, Burbank D, Alsdorf D (2007) The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev Geophys: 45(2)
Goyal R, Agren J, Featherstone W, Sjoberg L, Dikshit O, Balasubramanian N (2021) Empirical comparison between stochastic and deterministic modifiers over the French Auvergne geoid computation test-bed. Surv Rev 0(0):1–13
Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Moritz H (2005) Physical geodesy. Springer, Wien
Hotine M (1969) Mathematical geodesy. US Environmental Science Services Administration, Rockville
Huang J, Vaníček P, Novak P (2000) An alternative algorithm to FFT for the numerical evaluation of Stokes’s integral. Stud Geophys Geod 44:374–380
ICGEM (2021) International centre for global Earth models. http://icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/home, Accessed date: 20.05.2021
Isik MS, Erol B, Erol S, Sakil FF (2021) High-resolution geoid modeling using least squares modification of Stokes and Hotine formulas in Colorado. J Geod 95(49):1–19
Janak J, Vanicek P, Foroughi I, Kingdon R, Sheng MB, Santos MC (2017) Computation of precise geoid model of Auvergne using current UNB Stokes-Helmert’s approach. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy 47(3):201–229
Jekeli C (1979) Global accuracy estimates of point and mean undulation differences, gravity anomalies, and potential coefficients. Technical report, Nr. 288, The Ohio State University
Kiamehr R, Eshagh M (2008) EGMlab, a scientific software for determining the gravity and gradient components from global geopotential models. Earth Science Informatics 1(2):93–103
Mardla S, Ellmann A, Agren J, Sjöberg LE (2018) Regional geoid computation by least squares modified Hotine’s formula with additive corrections. J Geod 92:253–270
Molodensky M, Yeremeev V, Yurkina M (1962) Methods for study of the external gravitation field and figure of the earth. English Translation: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem
Paul MK (1973) A method of evaluating the truncation error coefficients for geoidal height. Bulletin Geodesique 110:413–425
Sakil FF, Erol S, Ellmann A, Erol B (2021) Geoid modeling by the least squares modification of Hotine’s and Stokes’ formulae using non-gridded gravity data. Computers and geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104909
Sjöberg LE (1984) Least Squares modification of Stokes and Vening-Meinesz formulas by accounting for errors of truncation, potential coefficients and gravity data. Technical report, Technical report Department of Geodesy, Institute of Geophysics, University of Uppsala
Sjöberg LE (1991) Refined least squares modification of Stokes’ formula. Manuscr Geodaet 16:367–375
Sjöberg L. E. (1999) The IAG approach to the atmospheric geoid correction in Stokes’ formula and a new strategy. J Geod 73:362–366
Sjöberg L. E. (2003) A general model of modifying Stokes’ formula and its least squares solution. J Geod 77:790–804
Sjöberg L. E. (2007) The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy. J Geod 87:345–350
Sjöberg L. E., Eshagh M (2009) A geoid solution for airborne gravity data. Studia Geophyisica Geodetica 53(3):359–374
Sjöberg LE, Eshagh M (2012) A theory on geoid modelling by spectral combination of data from satellite gravity gradiometry, terrestrial gravity and an earth gravitational model. Acta Geodeatica Geophysica Hungarica 47(1):13–28
SRTM (2021) Shuttle radar topography mission. http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm, Access date: 20.05.2021
Ustun A, Abbak RA (2010) On global and regional spectral evaluation of global geopotential models. J Geophys Eng 7:369–370
Yildiz H, Forsberg R, Ågren J, Tscherning CC, Sjöberg LE (2012) Comparison of remove-compute-restore and least squares modification of Stokes’ formula techniques to quasi-geoid determination over the Auvergne test area. J Geodetic Sci 2(1):53–64
Zeray-Öztürk E, Abbak RA (2020) PHCSOFT: A Software package for computing physical height changes from GRACE based global geopotential models. Earth Science Informatics 13:1499–1505
Zhang C (1998) Estimation of dynamic ocean topography in the Gulf Stream area using the Hotine formula and altimetry data. J Geod 72(9):499–510
The authors thank to Prof. Dr. Lars E. Sjöberg at Geodesy Division of Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden for his beneficial discussion during the compilation of the manuscript. The second author is partly supported by the Estonian Research Council Grant PRG330. Two anonymous reviewers are cordially acknowledged for their constructive suggestions on the manuscript.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Communicated by: H. Babaie
About this article
Cite this article
Abbak, R.A., Ellmann, A. & Ustun, A. A practical software package for computing gravimetric geoid by the least squares modification of Hotine’s formula. Earth Sci Inform (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00713-3
- Auvergne test-bed
- Hotine’s integral
- Rugged topography
- Point-wise integration