Skip to main content

A grid interpolation technique for anomaly separation of stream sediments geochemical data based on catchment basin modelling, U-statistics and fractal

Abstract

Stream sediment geochemical survey is an efficient tool for regional prospecting of ore minerals. However, complex processes of dilution and enrichment made it difficult to be studied by conventional methods. One of the most important methods to separate anomalous areas are fractal and multifractal analysis; however, some techniques of the fractal analysis which are more popular and applicable, such as concentration-area, suffer from lack of a reliable interpolated map of stream sediments data. In this study, we introduce a simple workflow to separate anomalous areas in three steps: 1. a grid interpolation method is developed to produce continues geochemical surface based on geometry of Sample Catchment Basin (SCB), 2. Although U-statistics, a powerful spatial based method, has no permission to work with Stream sediment data, the grid interpolation prepares a convenience (by converting stream sediment data from vector nature into point or pixel-based data) to apply it for this type of geochemical data, 3. Finally, the fractal analysis is applied for anomaly separation. In other words, the transformation into pixel-based nature in the first step is followed by using U-statistics (or any spatial method) to compensate spatial relation among the pixels. Once an accurate interpolated map is computed in the first two steps, fractal analysis is capable to effectively separate different populations (i.e. background and anomaly) with the highest accuracy and validity. This workflow is implemented on 305 stream sediment samples from Saqez area located on western part of Iran to delineate Au mineralization. Results show that anomalous areas of Au are successfully separated in the final categorical map, which is highly matched with the location of 5 high potential zones of Au known in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Abdolmaleki M, Mokhtari AR, Akbar S, Alipour-Asll M, Carranza EJM (2014) Catchment basin analysis of stream sediment geochemical data: incorporation of slope effect. J Geochem Explor 140:96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Afzal P, Alghalandis YF, Khakzad A, Moarefvand P, Omran NR (2011) Delineation of mineralization zones in porphyry cu deposits by fractal concentration–volume modeling. J Geochem Explor 108:220–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Afzal P, Mirzaei M, Yousefi M, Adib A, Khalajmasoumi M, Zarifi AZ, Foster P, Yasrebi AB (2016) Delineation of geochemical anomalies based on stream sediment data utilizing fractal modeling and staged factor analysis. J Afr Earth Sci 119:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Agterberg FP (1996) Multifractal modelling of the sizes and grades of giant and supergiant deposits. Glob Tectonics Metallog:131–136

  5. Bartier PM, Keller CP (1996) Multivariate interpolation to incorporate thematic surface data using inverse distance weighting (IDW). Comput Geosci 22:795–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Behera S, Panigrahi MK, Pradhan A (2019) Identification of geochemical anomaly and gold potential mapping in the Sonakhan Greenstone belt, Central India: an integrated concentration-area fractal and fuzzy AHP approach. Appl Geochem 107:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonham-Carter GF, Rogers PJ, Ellwood DJ (1987) Catchment basin analysis applied to surficial geochemical data, Cobequid highlands, Nova Scotia. J Geochem Explor 29:259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao L, Cheng Q (2012) Quantification of anisotropic scale invariance of geochemical anomalies associated with Sn-cu mineralization in Gejiu, Yunan Province, China. J Geochem Explor 122:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carranza EJM (2008) Geochemical anomaly and mineral prospectivity mapping in GIS. Elsevier

  10. Cheng Q (1999a) Multifractal interpolation. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology. Trondheim, Norway, pp. 245–250

  11. Cheng Q (1999b) Spatial and scaling modelling for geochemical anomaly separation. J Geochem Explor 65:75–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng Q (2004) A new model for quantifying anisotropic scale invariance and for decomposition of mixing patterns. Math Geol 36:345–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng Q (2007) Mapping singularities with stream sediment geochemical data for prediction of undiscovered mineral deposits in Gejiu, Yunnan Province, China. Ore Geol Rev 32:314–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng Q, Agterberg FP, Ballantyne SB (1994) The separation of geochemical anomalies from background by fractal methods. J Geochem Explor 51:109–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng Q, Agterberg FP, Bonham-Carter GF (1996) A spatial analysis method for geochemical anomaly separation. J Geochem Explor 56:183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng Q, Bonham-Carter GF, Hall GEM, Bajc A (1997) Statistical study of trace elements in the soluble organic and amorphous Fe-Mn phases of surficial sediments, Sudbury Basin. 1. Multivariate and spatial analysis. J Geochem Explor 59:27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng Q, Xu Y, Grunsky E (2000) Integrated spatial and spectrum method for geochemical anomaly separation. Nat Resour Res 9:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Darehshiri A, Panji M, Mokhtari AR (2015) Identifying geochemical anomalies associated with cu mineralization in stream sediment samples in Gharachaman area, northwest of Iran. J Afr Earth Sci 110:92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Earle SAM (1978) Spatial presentation of data from regional geochemical stream surveys. Trans Inst Min Metall Sect B-Appl Earth Sci 87:B61–B65

    Google Scholar 

  20. Farahbakhsh E, Chandra R, Eslamkish T, Müller RD (2019) Modeling geochemical anomalies of stream sediment data through a weighted drainage catchment basin method for detecting porphyry Cu-Au mineralization. J Geochem Explor 204:12–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fletcher WK (1997) Stream sediment geochemistry in today’s exploration world. Proc Explor 97:249–260

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ghadimi F, Ghomi M, Aref Sedigh M (2016) Identification of Ti-anomaly in stream sediment geochemistry using of stepwise factor analysis and multifractal model in Delijan district, Iran. Int J Min Geo-Eng 50:77–95

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ghasemzadeh S, Maghsoudi A, Yousefi M, Mihalasky MJ (2019) Stream sediment geochemical data analysis for district-scale mineral exploration targeting: measuring the performance of the spatial U-statistic and CA fractal modeling. Ore Geol Rev 113:103115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghavami-Riabi R, Seyedrahimi-Niaraq MM, Khalokakaie R, Hazareh MR (2010) U-spatial statistic data modeled on a probability diagram for investigation of mineralization phases and exploration of shear zone gold deposits. J Geochem Explor 104:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goncalves MA, Mateus A, Oliveira V (2001) Geochemical anomaly separation by multifractal modelling. J Geochem Explor 72:91–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Geological Survey of Iran (2003) Geology map (1/100000) of Saquez (Report in persian)

  27. Hassani Pak A, Sharafodin M (2005) Exploration data analysis. Tehran University, Iran (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Haydari SM (2004) Mineralogy, geochemistry and fabric of gold mineralization in ductile shear zone of Kravian area. (Doctoral dissertation, M. Sc thesis, Tarbiyat Modares University, Iran).

  29. Heydari M, Rastad E, Mohajel M, Shamsa MJ (2006) Gold mineralization in ductile shear zone of Kervian (southwest of Saqez- Kordestan province). Geosciences 15:18–37

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lapworth DJ, Knights KV, Key RM, Johnson CC, Ayoade E, Adekanmi MA, Arisekola TM, Okunlola OA, Backman B, Eklund M (2012) Geochemical mapping using stream sediments in west-Central Nigeria: implications for environmental studies and mineral exploration in West Africa. Appl Geochem 27:1035–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li C, Ma T, Shi J (2003) Application of a fractal method relating concentrations and distances for separation of geochemical anomalies from background. J Geochem Explor 77:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lima A, De Vivo B, Cicchella D, Cortini M, Albanese S (2003) Multifractal IDW interpolation and fractal filtering method in environmental studies: an application on regional stream sediments of (Italy), Campania region. Appl Geochem 18:1853–1865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. H. Free, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. WH freeman, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Mohajjel M, Fergusson CL (2000) Dextral transpression in late cretaceous continental collision, Sanandaj–Sirjan zone, western Iran. J Struct Geol 22:1125–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Moon CJ (1999) Towards a quantitative model of downstream dilution of point source geochemical anomalies. J Geochem Explor 65:111–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ódor L, Horváth I, Fügedi U (1997) Low-density geochemical mapping in Hungary. J Geochem Explor 60:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Panahi A, Cheng Q (2004) Multifractality as a measure of spatial distribution of geochemical patterns. Math Geol 36:827–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Parsa M, Maghsoudi A, Yousefi M, Carranza EJM (2017) Multifractal interpolation and spectrum–area fractal modeling of stream sediment geochemical data: implications for mapping exploration targets. J Afr Earth Sci 128:5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Plant J, Hale M (1994) Drainage geochemistry. Handbook of exploration geochemistry

  41. Rantitsch G (2004) Geochemical exploration in a mountainous area by statistical modeling of polypopulational data distributions. J Geochem Explor 82:79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Seyedrahimi-Niaraq M, Hekmatnejad A (2021) The efficiency and accuracy of probability diagram, spatial statistic and fractal methods in the identification of shear zone gold mineralization: a case study of the Saqqez gold ore district, NW Iran. Acta Geochim 40:78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sim BL, Agterberg FP, Beaudry C (1999) Determining the cutoff between background and relative base metal smelter contamination levels using multifractal methods. Comput Geosci 25:1023–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Spadoni M (2006) Geochemical mapping using a geomorphologic approach based on catchments. J Geochem Explor 90:183–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Spadoni M, Cavarretta G, Patera A (2004) Cartographic techniques for mapping the geochemical data of stream sediments: the “sample catchment basin” approach. Environ Geol 45:593–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang W, Zhao J, Cheng Q (2013) Fault trace-oriented singularity mapping technique to characterize anisotropic geochemical signatures in Gejiu mineral district, China. J Geochem Explor 134:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang W, Cheng Q, Zhang S, Zhao J (2018) Anisotropic singularity: a novel way to characterize controlling effects of geological processes on mineralization. J Geochem Explor 189:32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Xiao F, Chen J (2012) Fractal projection pursuit classification model applied to geochemical survey data. Comput Geosci 45:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Xiao F, Chen J, Hou W, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Erten O (2018) A spatially weighted singularity mapping method applied to identify epithermal Ag and Pb-Zn polymetallic mineralization associated geochemical anomaly in Northwest Zhejiang, China. J Geochem Explor 189:122–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yousefi M, Carranza EJM (2015) Prediction–area (P–A) plot and C–A fractal analysis to classify and evaluate evidential maps for mineral prospectivity modeling. Comput Geosci 79:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAGEO.2015.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yousefi M, Carranza EJM, Kamkar-Rouhani A (2013) Weighted drainage catchment basin mapping of geochemical anomalies using stream sediment data for mineral potential modeling. J Geochem Explor 128:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yousefi M, Kreuzer OP, Nykänen V, Hronsky JMA (2019) Exploration information systems–a proposal for the future use of GIS in mineral exploration targeting. Ore Geol Rev 111:103005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yousefi M, Carranza EJM, Kreuzer OP, Nykänen V, Hronsky JMA, Mihalasky MJ (2021) Data Analysis Methods for Prospectivity Modelling as applied to Mineral Exploration Targeting: State-of-the-Art and Outlook. J Geochemical Explor:106839

  54. Zhengli M, Shenglin P, Jianqing L (2004) Fractal study of geochemical prospecting data in south area of Fenghuangshan copper deposit, Tongling, Anhui [J]. J Earth Sci Environ 26:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zuluaga MC, Norini G, Lima A, Albanese S, David CP, De Vivo B (2017) Stream sediment geochemical mapping of the mount Pinatubo-Dizon mine area, the Philippines: implications for mineral exploration and environmental risk. J Geochem Explor 175:18–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zuo R, Xia Q, Zhang D (2013) A comparison study of the C–A and S–A models with singularity analysis to identify geochemical anomalies in covered areas. Appl Geochem 33:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate GSI for sharing data and their constructive comments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Salimi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salimi, A., Rafiee, A. A grid interpolation technique for anomaly separation of stream sediments geochemical data based on catchment basin modelling, U-statistics and fractal. Earth Sci Inform (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00712-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Stream sediment
  • Sample catchment basin
  • U-statistics
  • Grid interpolation
  • Fractal analysis