Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Morphological classification of galaxies using Conv-nets

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the beginning of space exploration, the galaxy classification has been a vexing problem that has always muddled the astrophysicists. A number of techniques have proven their remarkable utility in the classification of galaxies, however, upon analysis, these methods revealed certain inefficiencies that cannot be overlooked. The traditional classification of galaxies in the universe contains a significant part of their history in the authority of government agencies where the classifications in the previous years were performed primarily by experts manually. Today’s astronomical research produces large amounts of data and manually labelling the galaxy images based on morphological features can be time-consuming and error-prone. The objective of this paper is to study and analyze the different types of machine learning methodologies used for classifying galaxies. An inference drawn from this study is that using deep learning algorithms in conjunction with some data augmentation techniques provide excellent classification results of galaxies. Considering the aforementioned fact, the authors have proposed a layered CNN based classification model along with certain data augmentation techniques to classify galaxies morphological. “The Galaxy Zoo” dataset has been used from Kaggle which is further handcrafted for ease of classification. The galaxies are classified into three classes: spiral, elliptical, and lenticular (somewhere in-between). It has been observed from the experimental work that the proposed model outperform than its earlier contemporaries and can be used effectively to classify the galaxies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd Elfattah M, El-Bendary N, Abu Elsoud MA, Hassanien AE, Tolba MF (2013) An intelligent approach for galaxies images classification, in 13th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS 2013), pp 167–172

  • Abd Elfattah M, Elbendary N, Elminir HK, Abu El-Soud MA, Hassanien AE (2014) Galaxies image classification using empirical mode decomposition and machine learning techniques, in 2014 International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICET), pp 15

  • Baillard A et al. (2011), The EFIGI catalogue of 4458 nearby galaxies with detailed morphology, Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol 532, id.A74, 27

  • Ball NM, Brunner RJ, Myers AD, Tcheng D (2006) Robust Machine Learning Applied to Astronomical Data Sets. I. Star-Galaxy Classification of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR3 Using Decision Trees. Astrophysical J 650:497–509. https://doi.org/10.1086/507440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner RJ, Kim EJ (2017) Star-galaxy classification using deep convolutional neural networks. Monthly Royal Astronomical Soc 464:4463–4475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calleja J, Fuentes O (2003) Machine learning and image analysis for morphological galaxy classification

  • De La Calleja J, Fuentes O (2004) Machine learning and image analysis for morphological galaxy classification. Mon Not R Astron Soc 349(1):87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djorgovski S, Davis M (1987) Fundamental properties of elliptical galaxies. Astrophys J 313:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djorgovski SG, Donalek C, Mahabal A, Williams R, Drake AJ, Graham MJ, Glikman E (2006) Some pattern recognition challenges in data-intensive astronomy. In 18th international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR'06). IEEE 1:856–863

  • Doi M, Fukugita M, Okamura S (1993) Morphological classification of galaxies using simple photometric parameters. Mon Not R Astron Soc 264(4):832–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein DJ, Weinberg DH, Agol E, Aihara H, Prieto CA, Anderson SF et al (2011) SDSS-III: massive spectroscopic surveys of the distant universe, the milky way, and extra-solar planetary systems. Astron J 142(3):72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmegreen DM, Elmegreen BG (1987) Arm classifications for spiral galaxies. Astrophys J 314:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaxy Zoo project(2014) Galaxy Zoo dataset from https://www.kaggle.com/c/galaxy-zoo-the-galaxy-challenge/data

  • Goderya SN, Lolling SM (2002) Morphological classification of galaxies using computer vision and artificial neural networks: a computational scheme. Astrophys Space Sci 279(4):377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habibi Aghdam H, Jahani Heravi E (2017) Guide to Convolutional Neural Networks. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Kasivajhula S, Raghavan N, Shah H (2007) Morphological galaxy classification using machine learning. Mon Not R Astron Soc 8:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly BC, McKay TA (2004) Morphological classification of galaxies by shapelet decomposition in the Sloan digital sky survey. Astron J 127(2):625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahav O, Nairn A, Sodré L Jr, Storrie-Lombardi MC (1996) Neural computation as a tool for galaxy classification: methods and examples. Mon Not R Astron Soc 283(1):207–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/283.1.207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintott C, Schawinski K, Bamford S, Slosar A, Land K, Thomas D, Szalay A (2011) Galaxy zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900 000 galaxies. Mon Not R Astron Soc 410(1):166–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin MA, Sucar LE, Gonzalez JA, Diaz R (2013a) A hierarchical model for morphological galaxy classification. In The Twenty-Sixth International FLAIRS Conference

  • Marin M, Sucar LE, Gonzalez JA, Diaz R (2013b) A Hierarchical Model for Morphological Galaxy Classification, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pp 438–443

  • Perez L, Wang J (2017) The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification using deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.04621

  • Raicu I, Foster I, Szalay A, Turcu G (2006) Astroportal: a science gateway for large-scale astronomy data analysis. In: Teragrid conference. pp 12-15

  • Sifre L, Mallat S (2013) In: Gerard M, Ramin Z (eds) Proc. IEEE Conf. On computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), rotation, scaling and deformation invariant scattering for texture discrimination. IEEE, New York, p 1233

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiekermann G (1992) Automated morphological classification of faint galaxies. In: HT MG, Thomson EB (eds) Digitised optical sky surveys. Astrophysics and space science library (a series of books on the recent developments of space science and of general geophysics and astrophysics published in connection with the journal space science reviews), vol 174. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Storrie-Lombardie MC, Lahav O, Sodre L, Storrie-Lombardie LJ (1992), Morphological Classification of Galaxies by Artificial Neural Network

  • Valentijn EA (1990) Opaque spiral galaxies. Nature 346(6280):153–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh S (2009) Lenticular galaxies and their environments. Astrophys J 702(2):1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyk DA, Meng XL (2001) The art of data augmentation. J Comput Graph Stat 10(1):1–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir N, Fayyad UM, Djorgovski S (1995) Automated star/galaxy classification for digitized POSS-II. Astron J 109:2401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett KW, Lintott CJ, Bamford SP, Masters KL, Simmons BD, Casteels KRV, Edmondson EM, Fortson LF, Kaviraj S, Keel WC, Melvin T, Nichol RC, Raddick MJ, Schawinski K, Simpson RJ, Skibba RA, Smith AM, Thomas D (2013) Galaxy zoo : detailed morphological classifications for 304 122 galaxies from the Sloan digital sky survey. Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Soc 435(4):2835–2860. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1458

  • Wong SC, Gatt A, Stamatescu V, McDonnell MD (2016) Understanding data augmentation for classification: when to warp?. In 2016 international conference on digital image computing: techniques and applications (DICTA) (pp 1-6). IEEE

  • Xu Y, Jin Z (2008). Down-sampling face images and low-resolution face recognition. In 2008 3rd international conference on innovative computing information and control (pp 392-392). IEEE

  • Zhang Y, Zhao D, Zhang J, Xiong R, Gao W (2011) Interpolation-dependent image downsampling. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(11):3291–3296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou DX (2020) Theory of deep convolutional neural networks: Downsampling. Neural Netw 124:319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zooniverse (n.d.) The science behind the site. https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/zookeeper/galaxy-zoo/about/research

Download references

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, J. C. Bose University of Science & Technology, YMCA, Faridabad, India

    Lalit Mohan Goyal

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, G. B. Pant Government Engineering College, New Delhi, Okhla, India

    Maanak Arora, Tushar Pandey & Mamta Mittal

Authors
  1. Lalit Mohan Goyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maanak Arora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tushar Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mamta Mittal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tushar Pandey or Mamta Mittal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goyal, L.M., Arora, M., Pandey, T. et al. Morphological classification of galaxies using Conv-nets. Earth Sci Inform 13, 1427–1436 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00526-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00526-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation