Advertisement

Earth Science Informatics

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 355–363 | Cite as

Experiences of a “semantics smackdown”

  • Adam M. LeadbetterEmail author
  • Adam Shepherd
  • Robert Arko
  • Cynthia Chandler
  • Yanning Chen
  • Nkemdirim Dockery
  • Renata Ferreira
  • Linyun Fu
  • Robert Thomas
  • Patrick West
  • Stephan Zednik
Methodology Article

Abstract

Within the field of ocean science there is a long history of using controlled vocabularies and other Semantic Web techniques to provide a common and easily exchanged description of datasets. As an activity within the European Union, United States, Australian-funded project “Ocean Data Interoperability Platform”, a workshop took place in June 2014 at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute to further the use of these Semantic Web techniques with the aim of producing a set Linked Data publication patterns which describe many parts of a marine science dataset. During the workshop, a Semantic Web development methodology was followed which promoted the use of a team with mixed skills (computer, data and marine science experts) to rapidly prototype a model ontology which could be iterated in the future. In this paper we outline the methodology employed in the workshop, and examine both the technical and sociological outcomes of a workshop of this kind.

Keywords

Oceanography Semantic Web Linked Data Development Patterns Workshop Methodology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was funded in part through European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 312492, and in part by supplemental funding from the National Science Foundation to the R2R program (NSF OCE 0947877, 0947822, 0947828, 0947784). The workshop was kindly hosted by the Tetherless World Constellation at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. At the time of the workshop, Adam Leadbetter represented the British Oceanographic Data Centre.

References

  1. Archer P (2014) Report of the Joint World Wide Web Consortium/Open Geospatial Consortium workshop Linking Geospatial Data, 5th - 6th March, 2014, Campus London, Shoreditch, London, UK World Wide Web Consortium https://wwww3org/2014/03/lgd/report Accessed 27 May 2015
  2. Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Adm Sci Q 35:61–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berners-Lee T (2006) Linked Data - design issues. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html. Accessed 10 April 2015
  4. Chen Y, Shepherd A, Chandler C, Arko R, Leadbetter A (2014) Ontology based vocabulary matching for oceanographic instruments. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (Vol. 16, p. 12909).Google Scholar
  5. Cox S (2010) Observations and measurements. OGC abstract specification topic 20. open geospatial consortium document 10-004r3. http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/41579. Accessed December 8, 2014.
  6. DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ Sci 5(2):121–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duerr R, McCusker J, Parsons M, Khalsa S, Pulsifer P, Thompson C, Yan R, McGuinness D, Fox P (2015) Formalizing the semantics of sea ice. Earth Science Informatics 8(1):51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans JD (1997) Infrastructures for sharing geographic information among environmental agencies. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernández López M. (1999) Overview of methodologies for building ontologies. Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 workshop on Ontologies and problem solving methods (KRR5). Stockholm, Sweden, August 2.Google Scholar
  10. Fox P, McGuinness D (2008) TWC Semantic Web Methodology. Tetherless World Constellation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. http://tw.rpi.edu/web/doc/TWC_SemanticWebMethodology. Accessed 10 April 2015
  11. Fox P, McGuinness D, Cinquini L, West P, Garcia J, Benedict J, Middleton D (2009) Ontology-supported scientific data frameworks: The virtual solar-terrestrial observatory experience. Comput Geosci 35(4):724–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fu L, Arko R, Leadbetter A (2014) Rapid deployment of a restful service for oceanographic research cruises. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (Vol. 16, p. 1335).Google Scholar
  13. Glaves H, Schaap D, Arko R, Proctor R (2014) Ocean Data Interoperability Platform (ODIP): supporting the development of a common global framework for marine data management through international collaboration. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts 16: 14366.Google Scholar
  14. Gómez-Pérez, A. (1998). Knowledge sharing and reuse. Handbook of applied expert systems, 10–11.Google Scholar
  15. INSPIRE (2013). D2.8.II/III.7 Data specification on environmental monitoring Facilities - technical guidelines. Accessed February 01, 2016. http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_EF_v3.0.pdf
  16. International Oceanographic Commission (1987) A general formatting system for Geo-referenced Data. International Oceanographic Commission, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  17. Leadbetter A, Arko R, Chandler C, Shepherd A, Lowry R (2013) Linked Data: An oceanographic perspective. J Ocean Tech 8(3):7–12Google Scholar
  18. Leadbetter A, Arko R, Chandler C, Shepherd A, Lowry R (2015) Loose integration of local information to generate collaborative marine science knowledge. In: Diviacco P, Fox P, Pshenichy C, Leadbetter A (eds) Collaborative Knowledge in Scientific Research Networks. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 238–261Google Scholar
  19. Leadbetter A, Lowry R, Clements DO (2014) Putting meaning into NETMAR - the open service network for marine environmental data. Int J of Digital Earth 7(10):811–828. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2013.781243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leadbetter A, Vodden P (2015) Semantic linking of complex properties, monitoring processes and facilities in web-based representations of the environment. Int J of Digital Earth, online only. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2015.1033483
  21. Lebo T, Sahoo S, McGuinness D eds. (2013) PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/ Accessed October 17 2014,
  22. Lebo T, West P, McGuinness DL (2014) Walking into the future with PROV Pingback: An application to OPeNDAP using Prizms. In Provenance and annotation of data and processes. Springer International Publishing, 31–43.Google Scholar
  23. McGuinness DL (2003) Ontologies come of age. Spinning the semantic web: bringing the World Wide Web to its full potential, 171-196.Google Scholar
  24. Markus ML, Robey D (1988) Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Manag Sci 34(5):583–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Narock T, Krisnadhi A, Hitzler P, Cheatham M, Arko R, Carbotte S, Shepherd A, Chandler C, Raymond L, Wiebe P, Finin T (2014) The oceanlink project. In 2014 I.E. International Conference on Big Data (pp. 14–21). IEEE.Google Scholar
  26. Orlikowski WJ, Robey D (1991) Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Inf Syst Res 2(2):143–169Google Scholar
  27. Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ Sci 3(3):398–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ranson S, Hinings B, Greenwood R (1980) The structuring of organizational structures. Adm Sci Q 25:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. RDA Europe (2014) “The data harvest: How sharing research data can yield knowledge, jobs, and growth”. An RDA Europe Report. December, 2014. http://europe.rd-alliance.org/documents/publications-reports/data-harvest-how-sharing-research-data-can-yield-knowledge-jobs-and
  30. Riley E (2015) Tackling environmental issues at EnviroHack 2015 – Part 1. Digital catapult centre. http://www.digitalcatapultcentre.org.uk/tackling-environmental-issues-at-envirohack-2015-part-1/ Accessed June 8 2014.
  31. Rozum I, Raoult B, Dee D (2014) Assessing variability in climate data: a significant event viewer tool. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts 16: 13327.Google Scholar
  32. United States National Science Foundation (2015) “NSF’S PUBLIC ACCESS PLAN: Today’s Data, Tomorrow’s Discoveries; Increasing Access to the Results of Research Funded by the National Science Foundation”. US NSF 15-52. Arlington, VA, USA. March 2015. http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf15051
  33. Urban ER Jr, Boscolo R (2013) Using Scientific Meetings to Enhance the Development of Early Career Scientists. Oceanography 26(2):164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van De Poel I (2000) On the role of outsiders in technical development. Tech Anal Strat Manag 12(3):383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam M. Leadbetter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adam Shepherd
    • 2
  • Robert Arko
    • 3
  • Cynthia Chandler
    • 2
  • Yanning Chen
    • 4
  • Nkemdirim Dockery
    • 5
  • Renata Ferreira
    • 6
  • Linyun Fu
    • 4
  • Robert Thomas
    • 7
  • Patrick West
    • 4
  • Stephan Zednik
    • 4
  1. 1.Marine InstituteGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Woods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA
  3. 3.Lamont-Doherty Earth ObservatoryColumbia UniversityPalisadesUSA
  4. 4.Tetherless World ConstellationRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA
  5. 5.Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction StudiesFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  6. 6.Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  7. 7.British Oceanographic Data CentreNational Oceanography CentreLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations