Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of situational legitimacy and assertiveness-related anxiety/discomfort on motivation and ability to generate effective criticism responses

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares the motivation and the quality of criticism responses of 697 undergraduates who were divided into three levels of situation legitimacy (high, moderate, and low) and two levels (top versus bottom 40 percent) of anxiety related to previous generalized assertiveness behaviours. The impact of gender was also studied. The results showed the legitimacy of the situation for a critical response (preassessed with peer hold-out groups) significantly affected participants' motivation to criticize as well as the quality of their critical responses, notwithstanding the poor quality of all criticism responses. Anxiety related to previous global assertiveness was related to high motivation but not to quality of criticism responses. There were no gender effects. Results are interpreted within an avoidance learning paradigm wherein the connotative meaning of criticism is incongruent with harmonious long-term relationships so that it is suppressed until virtually forced by the specifics of highly legitimate situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden, L. & Cappe, R. (1981). Nonassertiveness: Skill deficit or selection evaluation? Behavior Therapy 12: 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alden, L. & Safran, J. (1978). Irrational beliefs and nonassertive behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2: 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 37: 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. (1990). Countering the effects of destructive criticism: The relative efficacy of four interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology 75: 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, H. D. & Zimmerman, S. F. (1971). Toward the development of a screening scale for assertive training. Psychological Reports 28: 99–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bern, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42: 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright, D. (1988). Criticism in your life. New York: Master Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, M. A. (1981). A task analysis of assertive behavior revisited: Replication and extension. Behavior Therapy 12: 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, P. (1981). Self assertion for women. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiauzzi, E. & Heimberg, R. G. (1986). Legitimacy of request and social problem solving: A study of assertive and nonassertive subjects. Behavior Modification 10: 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, M. L. (1979). Interests of assertiveness trainees. Journal of Counselling Psychology 26: 173–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J. P. & Monti, P. M. (Eds). (1982). Social skills training: A practical guide for assessment and treatment. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Zurilla, T. J. & Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 78: 107–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D'Zurilla, T. J. & Nezu, A. (1980). A study of the generation-of-alternatives process in social problem solving. Cognitive Therapy and Research 4: 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D'Zurilla, T. J. & Nezu, A. (1982). Social problem solving in adults. In P. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 201–274). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, D. & Beach, I. R. (1978). On the decision to be assertive. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 46: 537–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galassi, M. D. & Galassi, J. P. (1978). Assertion: A critical review. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice 1: 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galassi, J. P. & Galassi, M. D. (1979). A comparison of the factor structure of an assertion scale across sex and population. Behavior Therapy 10: 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrill, E. D. & Richey, C. A. (1975). An assertion inventory for use in assessment and research. Behavior Therapy 6:550–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimberg, R. G., Chiauzzi, E., Becker, R. E., & Madrazo-Peterson, R. (1983). Cognitive mediation of assertive behavior: An analysis of the self-statement patterns of college students, psychiatric patients, and normal adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research 7:455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimberg, R. G., Montgomery, D., Madsen, C. H., & Heimberg, J. S. (1977). Assertion training: A review of the literature. Behavior Therapy 8: 953–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, N. M. (1976). Generalization of behaviorally oriented assertive training. Psychological Record 26:117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuperminc, M. & Heimberg, R. G. (1983). Consequence probability and utility as factors in the decision to behave assertively. Behavior Therapy 14: 637–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, J. E., Norton, L. W., & Stoltenberg, C. D. (1986). Self-efficacy expectancy, outcome expectancy, and outcome value: Relative effectives on behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 783–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarrey, M., Piccinin, S., Welburn, K., & Chislett, L. (1989). Devaluation by women of self-reported criticism skills. Journal of Social Psychology 130: 317–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFall, R. M. & Lillesand, D. B. (1971). Behavior rehearsal with modeling and coaching in assertion training. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 76: 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevid, J. S. & Rathus, S. A. (1979). Factor analysis of the Rathus Assertiveness Schedule with a college population. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 10: 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccinin, S. (1986). Assertiveness interests of seniors. Unpublished paper. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccinin, S., McCarrey, M., Welburn, K., Chislett, L., Bourgon, G., & Scott, J. (1990). Short versus long term gains of a cognitive-behavioral social skills program targeting the giving and receiving of criticism. Current Psychology: Research & Reviews 9: 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccinin, S., McCarrey, M., Welburn, K., Chislett, L., Bourgon, G., & Jacques-Locmelis, W. (1992). Impact of treatment adherence intervention on a social skills program targeting criticism behaviors. Canadian Journal of Counselling 26: 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. R. & Schroeder, H. E. (1976). Research issues in assertiveness training. Psychological Bulletin 83: 1081–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisinger, H. & Lobsenz, N. M. (1981). Nobody's perfect: (How to give criticism and get results). New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, E. R., Rimm, D. C, & Kennedy, T. D. (1973). An experimental investigation of modeling and verbal reinforcement in the modification of assertive behavior. Behaviour Research and Therapy 11: 317–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piccinin, S., Mccarrey, M., Fairweather, D. et al. Impact of situational legitimacy and assertiveness-related anxiety/discomfort on motivation and ability to generate effective criticism responses. Curr Psychol 17, 75–92 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-998-1022-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-998-1022-7

Keywords

Navigation