Current Psychology

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 346–358 | Cite as

Gender differences in causal attributions by college students of performance on course examinations

  • Sylvia Beyer


Gender differences in causal attributions and emotions for imagined success and failure on examinations were investigated. Males made stronger ability attributions for success than females, whereas females emphasized the importance of studying and paying attention. Males more than females attributed failure to a lack of studying and low interest, but females were more likely than males to blame an F on a lack of ability. Females experienced stronger emotions than did males; they felt happier than males did after success but felt more like a failure than did males after imagining receiving an F on an examination. Some of the gender differences in causal attributions, especially for ability attributions, depended on the gender-type of the subject matter of the examinations. The implications of these findings are discussed.


Gender Difference Subject Matter Task Difficulty Gender Stereotype Stereotype Threat 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1982). Learned helplessness, depression, and the illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1114–1126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arkin, R. M., & Maruyama, G. M. (1979). Attribution, affect, and college exam performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bar-Tal, D., & Frieze, I. H. (1977). Achievement motivation for males and females as a determinant of attributions for success and failures. Sex Roles, 3, 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basow, S. A., & Medcalf, K. L. (1988). Academic achievement and attributions among college students: Effects of gender and sex typing. Sex Roles, 19, 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg, J. H., Stephan, W. G., & Dodson, M. (1981). Attributional modesty in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 711–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beyer, S. (1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 960–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beyer S. (1995). Maternal employment and children's academic achievement: Parenting style as mediating variable. Developmental Review, 15, 212–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beyer S. (1997a). The accuracy of gender stereotypes regarding college majors. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  10. Beyer S. (1997b). The accuracy of gender stereotypes regarding occupations. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  11. Beyer S. (1998). Gender differences in self-perception and negative recall biases. Sex Roles, 38, 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beyer, S., & Bowden E. M. (1997). Gender differences in self-perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Birenbaum, M., & Kraemer, R. (1995). Gender and ethnic-group differences in causal attributions for success and failure in mathematics and language examinations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 342–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boggiano, A. K., Main, D. S., & Katz, P. A. (1988). Children's preference for challenge: The role of perceived competence and control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 134–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, G. W., Andrews, B., Bifulco, A., & Veiel, H. (1990). Self-esteem and depression: I. Measurement issues and prediction of onset. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 25, 200–209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, G. W., Bifulco, A., & Andrews, B. (1990). Self-esteem and depression: III. Aetiological issues. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 25, 235–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colvin, C. R., & Block, J. (1994). Do positive illusions foster mental health? An examination of the Taylor and Brown formulation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 3–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crocker, J., Alloy, L. B., & Kayne, N. T. (1988). Attributional style, depression, and perceptions of consensus for events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 840–846.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cutrona, C. E., Cole, V., Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Russell, D. W. (1994). Perceived parental social support and academic achievement: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 369–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. D'Amico, M., Baron, L. J., & Sissons, M. E. (1995). Gender differences in attributions about microcomputer learning in elementary school. Sex Roles, 31, 353–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elig, T. W., & Frieze, I. H. (1979). Measuring causal attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 621–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Erkut, S. (1983). Exploring sex differences in expectancy, attribution, and academic achievement. Sex Roles, 9, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Falbo, T., & Beck, R. C. (1979). Naive psychology and the attributional model of achievement. Journal of Personality, 185-195.Google Scholar
  26. Feather, N. T. (1969). Attribution of responsibility and valence of success and failure to initial confidence and task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frieze, I. H. (1976). Causal attributions and information seeking to explain success and failure. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilbert, M. C. (1996). Attributional patterns and perceptions of math and science among fifth-grade through seventh-grade girls and boys. Sex Roles, 35, 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilmor, T. M., & Reid, D. W. (1979). Locus of control and causal attribution for positive and negative outcomes on university examinations. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 154–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glass, D. C., McKnight, D., & Valdimarsdottir, H. (1993). Depression, burnout, and perceptions of control in hospital nurses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 147–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents' involvement in children's schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65, 237–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1993). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 904–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harter, S., & Connell, J. P. (1984). A model of children's achievement and related self-perceptions of competence, control, and motivational orientation. In J. G. Nicholls (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 3 (pp. 219–250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  34. Heilman, M. E., & Kram, K. E. (1978). Self-derogating behavior in women—Fixed or flexible: The effects of co-worker's sex. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ickes, W., & Layden, M. A. (1978). Attributional styles. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research, Vol. 2 (pp. 119–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). The benefits of illusions, the threat of disillusionment, and the limitations of inaccuracy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 158–175.Google Scholar
  37. Kurman, J., & Sriram, N. (1997). Self-enhancement, generality of self-evaluation, and affectivity in Israel and Singapore. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. LaNoue, J. B., & Curtis, R. C. (1985). Improving women's performance in mixed-sex situations by effort attributions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levine, R., Gillman, M.-J., & Reis, H. (1982). Individual differences for sex differences in achievement attributions? Sex Roles, 8, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levine, R., Reis, H. T., Sue, E., & Turner, G. (1976). Fear of failure in males: A more salient factor than fear of success in females? Sex Roles, 2, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindeman, M., Suridvik, L., & Rouhiainen, P. (1995). Under or overestimation of self? Person variables and self-assessment accuracy. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 123–134.Google Scholar
  42. Little, T. D., & Lopez, D. F. (1997). Regularities in the development of children's causality beliefs about school performance across six sociocultural contexts. Developmental Psychology, 33, 165–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, B. A., Kovac, M. L., & Hryshko, A. (1989). Causal attributions and anticipated work performance. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 491–502.Google Scholar
  44. McHugh, M. C., Frieze, I. H., & Hanusa, B. H. (1982). Attributions and sex differences in achievement: Problems and new perspectives. Sex Roles, 8, 461–479.Google Scholar
  45. Meehan, A. M., & Overton, W. F. (1986). Gender differences in expectancies for success and performance on Piagetian spatial tasks. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 32, 427–441.Google Scholar
  46. Newman, R. S., & Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Children's achievement and causal attributions in mathematics and reading. Journal of Experimental Education, 58, 197–212.Google Scholar
  47. Parsons, J. E., Meece, J. L., Adler, T. F., & Kaczala, C. M. (1982). Sex differences in attributions and learned helplessness. Sex Roles, 8, 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pasquella, M. H., Mednick, M. T. S., & Murray, S. R. (1981). Causal attributions for achievement outcomes: Sex-role identity, sex and outcome comparisons. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 586–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peterson, C., & Barrett, L. C. (1987). Explanatory style and academic performance among university freshmen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 603–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Phillips, D. (1984). The illusion of incompetence among academically competent children. Child Development, 55, 2000–2016.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Phillips, D. (1987). Socialization of perceived academic competence among highly competent children. Child Development, 58, 1308–1320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosenfield, D., & Stephan, W. G. (1978). Sex-differences in attributions for sex-typed tasks. Journal of Personality, 46, 244–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rustemeyer, R., & Jubel, A. (1996). Geschechtsspezifische Unterschiede im Unterrichtsfach Mathematik hinsichtlich der Fähigkeitseinschätzung, Leistungserwartung, Attribution sowie im Lernaufwand und im Interesse. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 10, 13–25.Google Scholar
  54. Simon, J. G., & Feather, N. T. (1973). Causal attributions for success and failure at university examinations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Snyder, C. R. (1989). Reality negotiation: From excuses to hope and beyond. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 130–157.Google Scholar
  56. Sohn, D. (1982). Sex differences in achievement self-attributions: An effect-size analysis. Sex Roles, 8, 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52 613–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Swim, J. K., & Sanna, L. J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Travis, C. B., Phillippi, R. H., & Henley, T. B. (1991). Gender and causal attributions for mastery, personal, and interpersonal events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Viaene, N. (1979). Sex differences in explanations of success and failure. In O. A. Hartnett, G. Boden, & M. Fuller (Eds.), Sex-role stereotyping. New York: Travistock.Google Scholar
  64. Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation as conceptualized by an attribution theorist. In B. Weiner (Ed.), Achievement motivation and attribution theory (pp. 3–48). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  65. Weiner, B; (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Whitley, B. E., Jr., McHugh, M. C, & Frieze, I. H. (1986). Assessing the theoretical models for sex differences in causal attributions of success and failure. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn, The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 102–135). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wiegers, R. M., & Frieze, I. H. (1977). Gender female traditionality, achievement level, and cognitions of success and failure. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvia Beyer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WisconsinParksideUSA

Personalised recommendations