Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dilution in legal decision making: Effect of non-diagnostic information in relation to amount of diagnostic evidence

  • Articles
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Judgments about others are often based on information that varies in terms of its diagnosticity or usefulness in predicting a certain outcome. Previous studies have demonstrated a “dilution effect” in which the addition of nondiagnostic or irrelevant information yields less extreme judgments than those based solely on diagnostic information. Two studies investigated the dilution effect in a juror decision making context in which no midpoint of a scale was provided by researchers. Study 1 examined the inclusion of positive, negative, or neutral character information in a criminal case and found that this nondiagnostic information affected attitude toward the defendant but did not “dilute” guilt judgments. The cases in Study 1 contained a larger amount of diagnostic information than studies that demonstrated the dilution effect. Thus, the amount of diagnostic evidence provided was varied in Study 2, and the results showed “diluted” judgments only when a small amount of diagnostic information was presented. Limitations to the dilution effect were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alicke, M.D. & Yurak, T.J. (1995). Perpetrator personality and judgments of acquaintance rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1900–1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.H. (1981) Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 218–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C.K.W., Yzerbyt, V.Y., & Leyens, J. (1995) Dilution of stereotype-based cooperation in mixed motive independence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 575–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, R. (Ed.). (1993). Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M. F. & Miller, L.E. (1978). Reducing the effects of juror bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1443–1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N.L. (1982). Trial participants behaviors and jury verdicts: An exploratory field study. In Konecni, V.J. & Ebbesen, E. (Eds.), The criminal justice system: A social-psychological analysis. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrae, C.N., Shepherd, J.W., & Milne, A.B. (1992). The effects of source credibility on the dilution of stereotype-based judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 765–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., Zukier, H., & Lemley, R.E. (1981). The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implication of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 248–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, D. (1997). Cognition: Exploring the science of the mind. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1989). Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 388–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Troutman, C. M., & Shanteau, J. (1977). Inferences based on nondiagnostic information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrightsman, L. S., Nietzel, M. T., & Fortune, W. H. (1994). Psychology and the legal system (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukier H. (1982). The dilution effect: The role of correlation and the dispersion of predictor variables in the use of nondiagnostic information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1163–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukier, H., & Jennings, D.L. (1983-1984). Nondiagnosticity and typicality effects in prediction. Social Cognition, 2, 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Middlebury College, USA

    H. David Smith

  2. Virginia Commonwealth University, USA

    Mark F. Stasson

  3. University of Maryland at Baltimore, USA

    William G. Hawkes

Authors
  1. H. David Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark F. Stasson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. William G. Hawkes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, H.D., Stasson, M.F. & Hawkes, W.G. Dilution in legal decision making: Effect of non-diagnostic information in relation to amount of diagnostic evidence. Curr Psychol 17, 333–345 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-998-1015-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-998-1015-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation