Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The boss can’t tell: Investigating how and when supervisor ingratiation spills over to observers

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior studies on impression management in the work context predominantly emphasize the target (supervisor) or actor perspective, largely ignoring the observer. Suggesting that a coworker’s perspective would serve scholars and practitioners better for behavioral implications of impression management at work, we contend that supervisor ingratiation by a coworker triggers a self-serving attributional process for the observer. We propose that the observer attributes a high-performing coworker’s supervisor’s ingratiation to the supervisor’s complacent acceptance of these behaviors in the form of their social perceptual (in)ability. We also propose that these attributions further lead to the observer’s imitation of the behavior in an effort to secure favorable outcomes. Furthermore, the study tests the moderating role of the self-serving attributional style in influencing the observer’s supervisor attributions. Results from 279 middle-level managers in the banking sector confirmed the hypotheses. Based on attribution theory and social learning literature, the study shows that an integrated view of the two domains of study provides a greater understanding of pervasive behavior. The results of the study are telling, as they imply a spillover of supervisor ingratiation to observers, suggesting potentially damaging effects of supervisor ingratiation on the overall work environment. The study offers a guiding point for the future of impression management literature while advancing attribution literature to a third-party perspective. Practical implications, future suggestions, and limitations are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset used in the present study will be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Abbas, M., Raja, U., Anjum, M., & Bouckenooghe, D. (2018). Perceived competence and impression management: Testing the mediating and moderating mechanisms. International Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12515

  • Aditya, R., & Hause, R. J. (2002). Interpersonal acumen and leadership across cultures: Pointers from the GLOBE study. In R. E. Riggio, S. E. Murphy, & F. J. Pirozzolo (Eds.), Multiple intelligences and leadership (pp. 215–240). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Ahmad, R., Ishaq, M. I., & Raza, A. (2023). Impression management as a friend or foe? Testing mediating role of narcissism and moderating role of ingratiation. Current Psychology, 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-023-04628-8/FIGURES/2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, S. L., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.

  • Allen, M. S., Robson, D. A., Martin, L. J., & Laborde, S. (2020). Systematic review and Meta-analysis of self-serving attribution biases in the competitive context of Organized Sport. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(7), 1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219893995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, S. H., & Hughes, B. (1998). Ingratiation as a political tactic: Effects within the organization. Management Decision, 36(2), 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryee, S., Debrah, Y. A., & Chay, Y. W. (1993). An investigation of ingratiation as a career management strategy: Evidence from Singapore. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(1), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199300000010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asadullah, M. A., Siddiquei, A., Musaddiq, M., & Amin, R. (2023). Ingratiating with bosses for favourable performance ratings: a serial mediation mechanism. Personnel Review, 52(4), 955–971. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2020-0351

  • Aw, E. C. X., & Chuah, S. H. W. (2021). Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me! Fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy. Journal of Business Research, 132, 146–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azeem, M. U., De Clercq, D., & Haq, I. U. (2020). Suffering doubly: How victims of coworker incivility risk poor performance ratings by responding with organizational deviance, unless they leverage ingratiation skills. The Journal of Social Psychology, 161(1), 86-102.

  • Azeem, S., Zafar, M. A., & Khan, A. K. (2023). The grapes are sour: An envier’s attributional perspective of coworker impression management. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(2), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/JMO.2020.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (2013). Motives and costs of self-presentation in Organizations. In R. A. Giacalone, & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression Managment in the Organization (pp. 57–72). Psychology.

  • Blickle, G., Diekmann, C., Schneider, P. B., Kalthöfer, Y., & Summers, J. K. (2012). When modesty wins: Impression management through modesty, political skill, and career success—a two-study investigation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(6), 899–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.603900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1580442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C., Long, D., & Turnley, W. (2016). Impression management in Organizations: Critical questions, answers, and Areas for Future Research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 377–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, W. M., Paul, J. B., & Halbesleben, J. R. (2019). LMX and attributions of Organizational Citizenship Behavior motives: When is Citizenship Perceived as Brownnosing? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10869-017-9526-5/FIGURES/2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving Bias: A Meta-Analytic Integration. Review of General Psychology, 3(1), 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., & Lin, M. M. (2014). The Effect of Applicant Impression Management Tactics on hiring recommendations: Cognitive and affective processes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63(4), 698–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaburu, D. S., Stoverink, A. C., Li, N., & Zhang, X. (2015). Extraverts engage in more interpersonal citizenship when motivated to Impression Manage. Journal of Management, 41(7), 2004–2031. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chunjiang, Y., Chen, Y., & Gao, J. (2022). How and when can employees with Status Motivation attain Their Status in a team? The roles of Ingratiation,OCBI, and Procedural Justice Climate. Group & Organization Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221112232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. E., Russell, D., & Jones, R. D. (1985). Cross-situational consistency in causal attributions: Does Attributional Style Exist? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 1043–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., & Pereira, R. (2023). You’re so good-looking and wise, my powerful leaders! When deference becomes flattery in employee–authority relations. Personnel Review, 52(5), 1525–1547. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2021-0573/FULL/PDF.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., Fatima, T., & Jahanzeb, S. (2021). Ingratiating with despotic leaders to Gain Status: The role of Power Distance orientation and self-enhancement motive. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(1), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-019-04368-5/FIGURES/3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donia, M. B. L., Johns, G., & Raja, U. (2016). Good soldier or good actor? Supervisor Accuracy in distinguishing between Selfless and Self-serving OCB motives. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10869-015-9397-6/TABLES/3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, K. K. (1994). In the eyes of the beholder: An attributional approach to ingratiation and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1379–1391. https://doi.org/10.2307/256678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foulk, T. A., & Long, D. M. (2016). Impressed by Impression Management: Newcomer reactions to Ingratiated supervisors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(7), 1487–1497. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerpott, F. H., & Van Quaquebeke, N. (2022). Kiss-Up-Kick-down to get ahead: A resource perspective on how, when, why, and with whom Middle managers Use Ingratiatory and Exploitative behaviours to Advance their careers. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOMS.12855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A. (2013). Self-serving bias as a self-sensemaking strategy: Explicit vs. tacit impression management. In R. A. Giacalone, & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the Organization (pp. 219–234). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Gordon, R. A. (1996). Impact of ingratiation on judgments and evaluations: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.

  • Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and Impression Management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1982). The self-serving attributional bias: Beyond self-presentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90081-6

  • Gross, C., Debus, M. E., Liu, Y., Wang, M., & Kleinmann, M. (2021). I am nice and capable! How and when newcomers’ self-presentation to their supervisors affects socialization outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(7), 1067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ham, J., & Vonk, R. (2011). Impressions of impression management: Evidence of spontaneous suspicion of ulterior motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JESP.2010.12.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P., & Martinko, M. J. (2009). An empirical examination of the role of attributions in psychological entitlement and its outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P., Madison, K., Martinko, M., Crook, T. R., & Crook, T. A. (2014). Attribution Theory in the Organizational sciences: The Road traveled and the path ahead. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. The Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, C. A., & Judge, T. A. (2004). The effect of applicant influence tactics on recruiter perceptions of fit and hiring recommendations: A field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 622–632. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L., Korotov, K., & Guillén Ramo, L. (2017). Behavior of charismatic leaders and follower’s attributional style, shared vision, and acceptance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017(1), 12445. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.12445abstract

  • Islam, N. (2004). Sifarish, sycophants, Power and Collectivism: Administrative culture in Pakistan. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852304044259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. (1964). Ingratiation, a social psychological analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

  • Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions; the attribution process in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 219–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., Rhodewalt, F., Berglas, S., & Skelton, J. A. (1981). Effects of strategic self-presentation on subsequent self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoutsis, I., Papalexandris, A., Thanos, I. C., & Nikolopoulos, A. G. (2012). The role of political tactics on the organizational context-career success relationship. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(9), 1908–1929. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.610345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeves, G. D., Westphal, J. D., & McDonald, M. L. (2017). Those closest wield the sharpest knife: how ingratiation leads to resentment and social undermining of the CEO. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216686053

  • Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. General Learning Press Morristown.

  • Kent, R. L., & Martinko, M. J. (1995). The Development and Evaluation of a Scale to Measure Organizational Attributional Style. In M. Martinko (Ed.), Attribution Theory: An Organizational Perspective (pp. 53–75). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315137926-5.

  • Khalid, M., Gulzar, A., & Khan, A. K. (2020). When and how the psychologically entitled employees hide more knowledge? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 89, 102413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. K., Moss, S., Quratulain, S., & Hameed, I. (2018). When and how subordinate performance leads to abusive supervision: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2801–2826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., O’Neill, J. W., & Cho, H. M. (2010). When does an employee not help coworkers? The effect of leader-member exchange on employee envy and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 530–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. K., LePine, J. A., Zhang, Z., & Baer, M. D. (2022). Sticking out Versus Fitting in: A Social Context Perspective of Ingratiation and its Effect on Social Exchange Quality with supervisors and teammates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/APL0000852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmitzki, C., & John, O. P. (1993). The implicit use of explicit conceptions of social intelligence OF. Person Individ Diff, 15(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90037-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafrenière, M. A. K., Sedikides, C., Van Tongeren, D. R., & Davis, J. (2016). On the Perceived Intentionality of Self-Enhancement. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1041447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(I), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34

  • Lee, S. H., & Barnes, C. M. (2021). An attributional process model of workplace gossip. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(2), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). Ingratiatory behaviors in Organizational Settings. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 572–587. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4307430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Ingratiation in the development of leader-Member Exchange. In R. A. Giacalone, & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the Organization (p. 343). Psychology.

  • Liu, D., Wang, S., & Wayne, S. J. (2015). Is being a good Learner Enough? An examination of the interplay between learning goal orientation and Impression Management Tactics on Creativity. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 109–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, D. M. (2016). A method to the martyrdom: Employee exemplification as an Impression Management Strategy. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(1), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386616663816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, D. M. (2021). Tacticality, authenticity, or both? The ethical Paradox of actor ingratiation and Target Trust reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(4), 847–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-019-04251-3/FIGURES/4

  • Long, D. M., Baer, M. D., Colquitt, J. A., Outlaw, R., & Dhensa-Kahlon, R. K. (2015). What will the boss think? The impression management implications of supportive relationships with star and project peers. Personnel Psychology, 68(3), 463–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12091

  • Lopez, E. S., & Ensari, N. (2014). The effects of leadership style, organizational outcome, and gender on attributional bias toward leaders. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/JLS.21326

  • Lyubykh, Z., Bozeman, J., Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., & Shan, J. V. (2022). Employee performance and abusive supervision: The role of supervisor over-attributions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.2560

  • Malle, B. F. (1999). How people explain behavior: A New Theoretical Framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(1), 23–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J., & Gardner, W. L. (1987). The Leader/Member attribution process. The Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J., Moss, S. E., Douglas, S. C., & Borkowski, N. (2007). Anticipating the inevitable: When leader and member attribution styles clash. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.003

  • Martinko, M., Harvey, P., Sikora, D., & Douglas, S. C. (2011a). Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates ’ attribution styles. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 751–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.013

  • Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., & Dasborough, M. T. (2011b). Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: A case of unrealized potential. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.690

  • Martinko, M. J., Sikora, D., & Harvey, P. (2012). The relationships between attribution styles, LMX, and perceptions of abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811435791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClean, S. T., Courtright, S. H., Yim, J., & Smith, T. A. (2021). Making nice or faking nice? Exploring supervisors’ two-faced response to their past abusive behavior. Personnel Psychology, 74(4), 693–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J. H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a Universal Positivity Bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulltetin, 130(5), 711–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711

  • Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076486

  • Pandey, J., & Bohra, K. A. (1984). Ingratiation as a function of organizational characteristics and supervisory styles. Applied Psychology, 33(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1984.tb01442.x

  • Park, S. H., Westphal, J. D., & Stern, I. (2011). Set up for a fall: The insidious effects of flattery and opinion conformity toward corporate leaders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 257–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211429102

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-PSYCH-120710-100452

  • Qasim, M., Irshad, M., Majeed, M., & Rizvi, S. T. H. (2022). Examining impact of islamic work ethic on task performance: Mediating effect of psychological capital and a moderating role of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(1), 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. A., & Elsass, P. M. (2013). Ingratiation and Impression Management. In Robert A. Giacalone & Paul Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression Management in the Organization (p. 235).

  • Reeder, G. D., Vonk, R., Ronk, M. J., Ham, J., & Lawrence, M. (2004). Dispositional attribution: Multiple inferences about motive-related traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.530

  • Robertson, C. J., Crittenden, W. F., Brady, M. K., & Hoffman, J. J. (2002). Situational Ethics Across Borders: A multicultural examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulin, N., Bangerter, A., & Levashina, J. (2014). Interviewers’ perceptions of impression management in employment interviews. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0295

  • Roulin, N., Bangerter, A., & Levashina, J. (2015). Honest and deceptive impression management in the employment interview: Can it be detected and how does it impact evaluations? Personnel Psychology, 68(2), 395–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12079

  • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.

  • Salovey, P., & Rodin, J. (1991). Provoking Jealousy and Envy: Domain Relevance and Self Esteem threat. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10(4), 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Audiences’ reactions to self-enhancing, self-denigrating, and accurate self-presentations, 18(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90083-X

  • Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. (1992). Interpersonal processes involving impression Regulation and Management. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.43.1.133

  • Segrest, S. L., Andrews, M. C., Geiger, S. W., Marlin, D., Martinez, P. G., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2020). Leapfrogging at work: Influencing higher levels in the chain of command. Personnel Review, 49(8), 1769–1786. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2019-0382

  • Sibunruang, H., & Kawai, N. (2023). Promoting career growth potential: Political skill, the acquisition of social resources and ingratiation. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibunruang, H., Garcia, P. R. J. M., & Tolentino, L. R. (2015). Ingratiation as an adapting strategy: Its relationship with career adaptability, career sponsorship, and promotability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, M., & Sabini, J. (1978). The perception of Envy. Social Psychology, 41(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvera, D., Martinussen, M., & Dahl, T. I. (2001). The Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, a self report measure of social intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 313–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V., Kumra, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2002). Gender and impression management: Playing the Promotion game. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014782118902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, R. (1955). The ability to judge people. Psychological Bulletin, 52(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, K., Narayanan, J., & McAllister, D. J. (2012). Envy as pain: Rethinking the nature of envy and its implications for employees and organizations. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Brummelhuis, L. L., Johns, G., Lyons, B. J., & ter Hoeven, C. L. (2016). Why and when do employees imitate the absenteeism of co-workers?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 134, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.04.001

  • Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Hoobler, J., & Ensley, M. D. (2004). Moderators of the relationships between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees’ attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turnley, W. H., Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2013). Crafting an image at another’s expense: Understanding unethical Impression Management in Organizations. In M. D. Giacalone, & R. A. Promislo (Eds.), Handbook of unethical work behavior: Implications for Individual Well-Being (pp. 123–139). Routledge.

  • Vonk, R. (1998). The slime effect: Suspicion and dislike of likeable behavior toward superiors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 849–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 487.

  • Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of Impression Management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 232–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/256734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). Attribution, emotion and action. In R. M. Sorrentino, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (pp. 281–312). Guilford Press.

  • Westphal, J., & Stern, I. (2007). Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male caucasian). Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., Ng, V., Alonso, N., Jeffrey, A., & Tay, L. (2023). Conceptualizing positive attributes across psychological perspectives. Journal of Personality, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOPY.12873

  • Wyer, R., & Srull, T. K. (2014). The role of affect and emotion in Information Processing. Memory and cognition in its Social Context. Psychology.

  • Yang, C., Chen, Y., & Gao, J. (2022). How and when can employees with status motivation attain their status in a team? The roles of ingratiation, OCBI, and procedural justice climate. Group & Organization Management, Epub ahead of print 1 July 2022.

  • Zhao, H., & Liden, R. C. (2011). Internship: A recruitment and selection perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no funding for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Sundas Azeem

  2. National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Muhammad Irshad

  3. United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates

    Abdul Karim Khan

Authors
  1. Sundas Azeem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Irshad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdul Karim Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sundas Azeem.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Respondents participated in the study after informed consent.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all co-authors, the corresponding author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azeem, S., Irshad, M. & Khan, A.K. The boss can’t tell: Investigating how and when supervisor ingratiation spills over to observers. Curr Psychol 43, 22989–23003 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06024-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06024-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation