Skip to main content
Log in

Irrelevant angry, but not happy, faces interfere with conscious perception under high perceptual load: The role of trait impulsivity

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that attentional bias towards emotional distractors depends on a task’s perceptual load. The specifics of the interaction of perceptual load in the context of conscious perception and the role of personality traits (i.e., anxiety and impulsivity) in this interaction have not been thoroughly explored. In the present study, we aimed to identify how personality traits affect the allocation of attention to irrelevant angry and happy emotional face stimuli under different attention conditions, which may affect perception. Participants performed a letter-search task, in which they searched for a target (X or N) in a low (circular non-target letters) or high (angular non-target letters) perceptual load condition in the presence of irrelevant emotional faces (happy or angry). Furthermore, in 25% of trials, a meaningless squiggle was presented in the periphery, and participants were required to detect the squiggle. The conscious perception of the squiggle was calculated using the d prime. We measured trait impulsivity with the UPPS-P Impulsive Behaviour scale and trait anxiety with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results showed that in highly impulsive participants, irrelevant angry faces presented during the high load condition significantly reduced their sensitivity to detecting the squiggle, compared with happy and neutral faces. The findings have theoretical implications for our understanding of the role of personality traits in the interaction between attention and emotions in shaping conscious perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gIh_L6slSVvS6xvCKu9sRAI2_eNHGoy2/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106334705737420245984&rtpof=true&sd=true

Notes

  1. To further confirm the mediating role of impulsivity in the interaction between emotion and load, we performed an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using 2 loads (high versus low) × and 3 emotions (happy, angry and neutral) as within-group factors by using the d’ score, in which the impulsivity score was used as covariate. Interestingly, there was a significant interaction between load and emotion when controlling for impulsivity F(2, 112) = 6.19, MSE = 0.428, p = .003, ηp2 = 0.10. There was a significant interaction between load and emotion as well F(2, 112) = 5.06, MSE = 0.428, p = .008, ηp2 = 0.083). The other main and interaction effects were not significant (F < 1, for all).

References

  • Anderson, B. A. (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azriel, O., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2020). Attention bias. In J. S. Abramowitz & S. M. Blakey (Eds.), Clinical handbook of fear and anxiety: Maintenance processes and treatment mechanisms (pp. 203–218). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000150-012

  • Bacon, W., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 485–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bashinski, H. S., & Bacharach, V. R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 241–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, D. M., & Lavie, N. (2005). Look here but ignore what you see: effects of distractors at fixation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 592–607.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D. V., Rheem, H., Pick, C. M., Ko, A., & Lafko, S. R. (2019). Angry faces hold attention: Evidence of attentional adhesion in two paradigms. Progress in Brain Research, 247, 89–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belopolsky, A. V., Devue, C. J., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). Angry faces hold the eyes. Visual Cognition, 19, 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, A. T., & Gibson, B. S. (2010). Competition between colour salience and perceptual load during visual selection can be biased by top-down set. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.1.53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. J. (2007). Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: an integrative account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 307–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. J., Jenkins, R., & Lawrence, A. W. (2007). Neural processing of fearful faces: effects of anxiety are gated by perceptual capacity limitations. Cerebral Cortex, 17(7), 1595–1603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brühl, A. B., Rufer, M., Delsignore, A., Kaffenberger, T., Jäncke, L., & Herwig, U. (2011). Neural correlates of altered general emotion processing in social anxiety disorder. Brain Research, 1378, 72–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright-Finch, U., & Lavie, N. (2006). The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition, 102, 321–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Johnson, S. L. (2018). Impulsive reactivity to emotion and vulnerability to psychopathology. The American Psychologist, 73, 1067–1078.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary, S., & Gupta, R. (2020). Culture and Borderline Personality Disorder in India. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 714.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Coskunpinar, A., & Cyders, M. A. (2013). Impulsivity and substance-related attentional bias: a meta-analytic review. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 133, 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cyders, M. A., Littlefield, A. K., Coffey, S., & Karyadi, K. A. (2014). Examination of a short English version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behaviour Scale. Addictive Behaviours, 39, 1372–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Acremont, M., & Van der Linden, M. (2007). Memory for angry faces, impulsivity, and problematic behaviour in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 313–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, N., & Tully, L. (2018). Impulsivity and tobacco product use over time. Addictive Behaviors, 85, 153–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dugré, J. R., Giguére, C. É., Percie du Sert, O., Potvin, S., & Dumais, A. (2019). The psychometric properties of a short upps-p impulsive behaviour scale among psychiatric patients evaluated in an emergency setting. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, L. S., Wolitzky-Taylor, K., & Olatunji, B. O. (2011). Measurement of anxious traits: a contemporary review and synthesis. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 25, 647–666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2015). Cognitive Psychology: A Student’s Handbook (7th ed.). Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenske, M. J., & Raymond, J. E. (2006). Affective Influences of Selective Attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 312–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, P. J. Q., Rita, P., Morais, D., Rosa, P. J., Oliveira, J., Gamito, P., & Sottomayor, C. (2011). Grabbing attention while reading website pages: the influence of verbal emotional cues in advertising. Journal of Eye Tracking, Visual Cognition and Emotion, 1, 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: the role of load. Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 14(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.73

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently? Cognition and Emotion, 14(1), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300378996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359, 1367–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gidron Y. (2013). Trait Anxiety. In: Gellman, M.D., & Turner, J.R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_1539

  • Gladwin, T. E., Figner, B., Crone, E. A., & Wiers, R. W. (2011). Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 364–376.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grisetto, F., Delevoye-Turrell, Y. N., & Roger, C. (2021). Slower adaptation of control strategies in individuals with high impulsive tendencies. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grissinger, M. (2012). “Inattentional blindness”: what captures your attention? P & T: a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 37, 542–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. (2007). Metacognitive Rehabilitation of Autobiographical Overgeneral Memory. The Journal of Cognitive Rehabilitation, 25(2), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. (2011). Attentional, visual, and emotional mechanisms of face processing in Williams syndrome. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. (2012). Distinct neural systems for men and women during emotional processing: a possible role of attention and evaluation. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 86. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. (2016). Neural control of vascular reactions: impact of emotion and attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1613.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. (2018). Possible cognitive-emotional and neural mechanism of unethical amnesia. Activitas Nervosa Superior, 60(1), 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. (2019). Positive emotions have a unique capacity to capture attention. Progress in Brain Research, 247, 23–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. (2022). Motivational salience, not valence, modulates time perception. Emotion, 22(2), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Kar, B. R. (2008). Interpretative Bias: Indicators of Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression. German Journal of Psychiatry, 11, 98–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Kar, B. R. (2009). Development of attentional processes in normal and ADHD children. Progress in Brain Research, 176, 259–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Kar, B. R. (2010). Specific Cognitive Deficits in ADHD: A Diagnostic Concern in Differential Diagnosis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 778–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Kar, B. R. (2012). Attention and memory biases as stable abnormalities among currently depressed and currently remitted individuals with Unipolar Depression. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 3, 99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00099

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Singh, J. P. (2021). Only irrelevant angry, but not happy, expressions facilitate the response inhibition. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 83, 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Singh, J. P. (2023). Irrelevant emotional expressions interfered with response inhibition: the role of contrast emotions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2242101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Srinivasan, N. (2015). Only irrelevant sad but not happy faces are inhibited under high perceptual load. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 747–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., Kar, B. R., & Thapa, K. (2006). Specific Cognitive Dysfunction in ADHD: An Overview. In J. Mukherjee & V. Prakash (Eds.), Recent Developments in Psychology (pp. 153–170). Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., Kar, B. R., & Srinivasan, N. (2011). Cognitive-Motivational Deficits in ADHD: Development of a Classification System. Child Neuropsychology, 17, 67–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., Hur, Y. J., & Lavie, N. (2016). Distracted by pleasure: Effects of positive versus negative valence on emotional capture under load. Emotion, 16, 328–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., Raymond, J. E., & Vuilleumier, P. (2019). Priming by motivationally salient distractors produces hemispheric asymmetries in visual processing. Psychological Research, 83(8), 1798–1807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., Jacob, J., & Bansal, G. (2022). The role of UBI in mitigating the effects of psychosocial stressors: A review and proposal. Psychological Reports, 125(4), 1801–1823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Srinivasan, N. (2009). Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotional Memory. In H. Eshwaran & N. S. Chatterjee (Eds.), Advances in Developmental Neuroscience and Imaging (pp. 91–96). Anamaya Publishers.

  • Hay, J. L., Milders, M. M., Sahraie, A., & Niedeggen, M. (2006). The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: The efficiency of selective inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 885.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Julian, L. J. (2011). Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care and Research, 63(Suppl 11), S467–S472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, W., Kim, G., Kim, H., & Lee, S. H. (2019). The influence of anxiety on the recognition of facial emotion depends on the emotion category and race of the target faces. Experimental Neurobiology, 28, 261–269.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, J. M., Sy, J. L., Tong, F., & Zald, D. H. (2019). The emotional attentional blink is robust to divided attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(1), 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, R. P., Libkuman, T. M., Otani, H., & Holmes, K. (2005). Emotional stimuli, divided attention, and memory. Emotion, 5(4), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N. (1994). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N. (2006). The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain Research, 1080, 91–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N. (2010). Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 143–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 183–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N., Beck, D. M., & Konstantinou, N. (2014). Blinded by the load: attention, awareness and the role of perceptual load. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130205–20130205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leshem, R., & Yefet, M. (2019). Does impulsivity converge distinctively with inhibitory control? Disentangling the cold and hot aspects of inhibitory control. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodha, S., & Gupta, R. (2020). Book review: Stress Less, Accomplish More: Meditation for Extraordinary Performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1830.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lodha, S., & Gupta, R. (2022). Mindfulness, attentional networks, and executive functioning: A review of interventions and long-term meditation practice. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 6(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-022-00254-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodha, S., & Gupta, R. (2023). Irrelevant angry, but not happy, faces facilitate response inhibition in mindfulness meditators. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04384-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodha, S., & Gupta, R. (2023). Are you distracted by pleasure? Practice mindfulness meditation. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 7, 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-023-00257-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodha, S., & Gupta, R. (2024). Irrelevant Emotional Information Does Not Modulate Response Conflict in Mindfulness Meditators. Mindfulness, 15, 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces—KDEF (CD ROM). Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section.

  • Madore, K. P., Khazenzon, A. M., Backes, C. W., Jiang, J., Uncapher, M. R., Norcia, A. M., & Wagner, A. D. (2020). Memory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking. Nature, 587(7832), 87–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. S. P., & Lavie, N. (2008). Load induced blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Methot, J. R., Rosado-Solomon, E. H., Downes, P. E., & Gabriel, A. S. (2021). Office chitchat as a social ritual: The uplifting yet distracting effects of daily small talk at work. Academy of Management Journal, 64(5), 1445–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickley Steinmetz, K. R., Waring, J. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2014). The effect of divided attention on emotion-induced memory narrowing. Cognition and Emotion, 28(5), 881–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.858616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. T., Robertson, C. D., Anastopolous, A. D., Nelson-Gray, R. O., & Kollins, S. H. (2012). Emotion dysregulation and emotional impulsivity among adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results of a preliminary study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioural Assessment, 34, 510–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2016). Anxiety and attention to threat: Cognitive mechanisms and treatment with attention bias modification. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 87, 76–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Garner, M., & Bradley, B. P. (2007). Anxiety and orienting of gaze to angry and fearful faces. Biological Psychology, 76, 163–169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, J. T. (2016). Attention and impulsivity. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1–56). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nummenmaa, L., Hyönä, J., & Calvo, M. G. (2006). Eye movement assessment of selective attentional capture by emotional pictures. Emotion, 6, 257–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, L., et al. (2013). Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S., & Gupta, R. (2023b). Happy faces facilitate inhibitory control under a narrow scope of attention. In M. Goldwater, F. K. Anggoro, B. K. Hayes, & D. C. Ong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, UC Merced (vol. 45, no. 45, pp. 3078–3085).

  • Pandey, S., & Gupta, R. (2022). Irrelevant positive emotional information facilitates response inhibition only under a high perceptual load. Scientific Reports, 12, 14591.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S., & Gupta, R. (2022). Irrelevant angry faces impair response inhibition, and the go and stop processes share attentional resources. Scientific Reports, 12, 16962.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S., & Gupta, R. (2023). Implicit angry faces interfere with response inhibition and response adjustment. Cognition and Emotion, 37(2), 303–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlstein, J. G., Johnson, S. L., Modavi, K., Peckham, A. D., & Carver, C. S. (2019). Neurocognitive mechanisms of emotion-related impulsivity: The role of arousal. Psychophysiology, 56(2), e13293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peschard, V., & Philippot, P. (2017). Overestimation of threat from neutral faces and voices in social anxiety. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 57, 206–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 148–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, L., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of attention and the processing of emotion-laden stimuli. Progress in Brain Research, 144, 171–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pool, E., Brosch, T., Delplanque, S., & Sander, D. (2016). Attentional bias for positive emotional stimuli: A meta-analytic investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 79–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, A. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2012). The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 339.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roiser, J. P., & Sahakian, B. J. (2013). Hot and cold cognition in depression. CNS Spectrums, 18, 139–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeh, N., & Bredemeier, K. (2010). Individual differences at high perceptual load: The relation between trait anxiety and selective attention. Cognition and Emotion, 25(4), 747–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., & Sunny, M. M. (2017). Emotion induced blindness is more sensitive to changes in arousal as compared to valence of the emotional distractor. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1381.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Soares, S. C., Rocha, M., Neiva, T., Rodrigues, P., & Silva, C. F. (2015). Social anxiety under load: the effects of perceptual load in processing emotional faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00479

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI (Form Y). Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, N., & Gupta, R. (2010). Emotion-attention interactions in recognition memory for distractor faces. Emotion, 10, 207–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, N., & Gupta, R. (2011). Global–local processing affects recognition of distractor emotional faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, P., & Srinivasan, N. (2010). Time course of visual attention with emotional faces. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72, 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, K. M., & Knouse, L. E. (2016). Is the Relationship Between ADHD Symptoms and Binge Eating Mediated by Impulsivity? Journal of Attention Disorders, 20, 907–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. B., Simmons, A. N., Feinstein, J. S., & Paulus, M. P. (2007). Increased amygdala and insula activation during emotion processing in anxiety-prone subjects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 318–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Summerell, E., Harmon-Jones, C., Kelley, N. J., Peterson, C. K., Krstanoska-Blazeska, K., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2019). Does cognitive broadening reduce anger? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2665.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Teichner, W. H., & Krebs, M. J. (1974). Visual search for simple targets. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, R. M., Miskovic, V., Chikazoe, J., & Anderson, A. K. (2020). Emotional objectivity: Neural representations of emotions and their Interaction with cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 25–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, K., Stewart, K., Antoniou, E. E., Palmberg, A., & Jansen, A. (2014). Food cue reactivity, obesity, and impulsivity: are they associated? Current Addiction Reports, 1, 301–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeiren, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2012). The validity of d′ measures. Plos One, 7(2), e31595.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier, P., & Huang, Y. M. (2009). Emotional attention: Uncovering the mechanisms of affective biases in perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 148–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual differences, 30, 669–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. (1999). Inattentional amnesia. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 71–94). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, A., Ashwin, C., & Fox, E. (2010). Does emotion processing require attention? The effects of fear conditioning and perceptual load. Emotion, 10(6), 822.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yiend,. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 3–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Q., Zhuang, Q., Wang, B., Liu, X., Zhao, G., & Zhang, M. (2018). The effect of anxiety on emotional recognition: evidence from an ERP study. Scientific Reports, 8, 16146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Mueller, S. T. (2005). A note on ROC analysis and non-parametric estimate of sensitivity. Psychometrika, 70, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J., Yu, C., Zhang, W., Bao, Z., Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhen, S. (2016). Peer victimization, deviant peer affiliation and impulsivity: Predicting adolescent problem behaviours. Child Abuse and Neglect, 58, 39–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zisner A. R., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2015). Midbrain neural mechanisms of trait impulsivity. In T. P., Beauchaine & S. P., Hinshaw (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Externalizing Spectrum Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199324675.013.003

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashmi Gupta.

Ethics declarations

The procedures used in this study were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee from our institute. Also, the procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

Human research participants signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muthukumaran, R., Gupta, R., Kakoschke, N. et al. Irrelevant angry, but not happy, faces interfere with conscious perception under high perceptual load: The role of trait impulsivity. Curr Psychol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05904-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05904-x

Keywords

Navigation