Skip to main content
Log in

When employee voice backfires: examining how and when employee voice induces workplace deviance

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract   

Extant literature has universally demonstrated that employee voice is a positive workplace behavior that is beneficial for organizations. We challenge this consensus by investigating the potential cost of employee voice for organizational ethics. Drawing upon moral licensing theory, we suggest that employees engaging in voice may lead them to develop psychological entitlement (i.e., a belief that they are owed special treatments from the organization), which in turn increases their workplace deviance. Furthermore, we propose that these effects are especially pronounced among employees with higher levels of power distance orientation. Empirical results from a vignette experiment and a multi-wave survey supported our hypotheses. Taken together, our research not only extends the literature on the consequences of voice by revealing the unforeseen perils of voice for organizations, but also delivers important practical implications for managing employee voice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is available on request for corresponding author.

Notes

  1. According to the anonymous reviewer’s suggestion, we tested our hypotheses by further controlling for employees’ prosocial orientation, perceived leader power, and the demographic characteristics of their leaders. The results did not show substantive changes compared to the results without controlling for these variables.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by a Fulbright Scholarship, sponsored by the U.S. government, and three grants funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72325012, 72272155, and 71872190), awarded to Dr. Xin Qin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P, Zhao formulated the research idea and conducted the study. P, Zhao and J, Guan drafted the manuscript and provided critical revisions to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Puchu Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standards and inform consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, P., Guan, J. When employee voice backfires: examining how and when employee voice induces workplace deviance. Curr Psychol 43, 18503–18516 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05587-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05587-w

Keywords

Navigation