Skip to main content
Log in

A network perspective to the measurement of sense of coherence (SOC): an exploratory graph analysis approach

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measurement of sense of coherence (SOC) has received attention for more than three decades. Despite the extensive use of SOC-13, there is still a long debate regarding its dimensionality structure. Recently, there has been an increasing use of network modeling as a valid alternative to latent-variable modeling. This study proposes an exploratory approach to the structure of SOC-13 by adopting a network perspective. The network structure was estimated with a Gaussian Graphical Model, and Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) was used to inspect network dimensionality. We fit and compared the unidimensional, first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), bifactor-CFA, and structure derived from EGA. Our results showed unacceptable fit values for the CFA models, suggesting that SOC-13 is not unidimensional. Inspection of the estimated network suggested that the SOC-13 items emerged as a dynamic system of mutually interacting nodes that formed three distinct clusters of items (communities) that are not those defined in the literature. EGA identified three communities of items: the first community was characterized by comprehensibility and manageability items, the second community was characterized by comprehensibility and manageability items, and the third dimension was characterized by all meaningfulness items and one comprehensibility item. Our study presented a novel perspective in investigating the structure of SOC-13 that strengthens the assumption that SOC should be conceptualized as a complex system of cognitive (comprehensibility), behavioral (manageability), and motivational dimensions (meaningfulness) that are deeply linked and not necessarily distinct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress and coping: New perspectives on mental and physical well-being. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  • Antonovsky, A. (1990). A somewhat personal odyssey in studying the stress process. Stress Medicine, 6(2), 71–80.

  • Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science and Medicine, 36(6), 725–733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bachem, R., & Maercker, A. (2016). Development and psychometric evaluation of a revised sense of coherence scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernabé, E., Tsakos, G., Watt, R. G., Suominen-Taipale, A. L., Uutela, A., Vahtera, J., & Kivimäki, M. (2009). Structure of the sense of coherence scale in a nationally representative sample: The Finnish Health 2000 survey. Quality of Life Research, 18, 629–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, 2008(10), P10008.

  • Bonacchi, A., Miccinesi, G., Galli, S., Chiesi, F., Martire, M., Guazzini, M., … & Primi, C. (2012). The dimensionality of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scales: An investigation with Italian samples. TPM, 19, 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonifay, W., Lane, S. P., & Reise, S. P. (2017). Three concerns with applying a bifactor model as a structure of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 184–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2013). Network Analysis: An Integrative Approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 91–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briganti, G., Fried, E. I., & Linkowski, P. (2019). Network analysis of contingencies of self-worth scale in 680 university students. Psychiatry Research, 272, 252–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Celeste, R. K., Scalco, G. P., Abegg, C., Pattussi, M. P., Ely, H. C., & Davoglio, R. S. (2022). Structural validity of the Brazilian version of the Sense of Coherence scale (SOC-13) in oral health research: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Bmc Oral Health, 22(1), 337. & do Carmo Matias Freire

  • Christensen, A. P., Garrido, L. E., & Golino, H. (2023). Unique variable analysis: A novel approach for detecting redundant variables in multivariate data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, Advance online publication.

  • Christensen, A. P., Garrido, L. E., Guerra-Peña, K., & Golino, H. (2020). Comparing community detection algorithms in psychological data: A Monte Carlo simulation. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hz89e

  • Christensen, A. P., & Golino, H. (2021). Estimating the stability of psychological dimensions via bootstrap exploratory graph analysis: A Monte Carlo simulation and tutorial. Psych, 3(3), 479–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A. P., Kenett, Y. N., Aste, T., Silvia, P. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (2018). Network structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales–Short forms: Examining psychometric network filtering approaches. Behavior Research Methods, 50(6), 2531–2550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constantin, M. A., Schuurman, N. K., & Vermunt, J. K. (2023). A general Monte Carlo method for sample size analysis in the context of network models. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication.

  • Cosemans, T., Rosseel, Y., & Gelper, S. (2021). Exploratory Graph Analysis for Factor Retention: Simulation results for continuous and Binary Data (p. 00131644211059089). Educational and Psychological Measurement.

  • Ding, Y., Bao, L. P., Xu, H., Hu, Y., & Hallberg, I. R. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of sense of coherence scale in women with Cervical cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 21(11), 1205–1214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drageset, J., & Haugan, G. (2016). Psychometric properties of the orientation to Life Questionnaire in nursing home residents. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 30(3), 623–630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epskamp, S. (2020). Psychonetrics: Structural equation modeling and Confirmatory Network Analysis. R Package Version 0.10. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psychonetrics/index.html.

  • Epskamp, S., & Fried, E. I. (2018). A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 617–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epskamp, S., Rhemtulla, M., & Borsboom, D. (2017). Generalized network psychometrics: Combining network and latent variable models. Psychometrika, 82, 904–927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epskamp, S., Waldorp, L. J., Mõttus, R., & Borsboom, D. (2018). The gaussian graphical model in cross-sectional and time-series data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(4), 453–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, M., & Contu, P. (2022). The sense of coherence: Measurement issues. In M. B. Mittelmark, et al. (Eds.), The handbook of Salutogenesis. Springer.

  • Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2005). Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale—A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(6), 460–466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, M., & Mittelmark, M. B. (2017). The Sense of Coherence and Its Measurement. In: Mittelmark MB, Sagy S, Eriksson M, Bauer GF, Pelikan JM, Lindström B, Espnes GA, editors. The Handbook of Salutogenesis [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2017.

  • Feldt, T., Leskinen, E., Kinnunen, U., & Mauno, S. (2000). Longitudinal factor analysis models in the assessment of the stability of sense of coherence. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldt, T., Lintula, H., Suominen, S., Koskenvuo, M., Vahtera, J., & Kivimäki, M. (2007). Structural validity and temporal stability of the 13-item sense of coherence scale: Prospective evidence from the population-based HeSSup study. Quality of Life Research, 16(3), 483–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frenz, A. W., Carey, M. P., & Jorgensen, R. S. (1993). Psychometric evaluation of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, E. I., & Cramer, A. O. (2017). Moving forward: Challenges and directions for psychopathological network theory and methodology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 999–1020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • George-Levi, S., Schmidt-Barad, T., Natan, I., & Margalit, M. (2022). Sense of coherence and burnout among school psychologists: The moderating role of loneliness. Current Psychology, 41(4), 2390–2397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Getnet, B., & Alem, A. (2019). Construct validity and factor structure of sense of coherence (SoC-13) scale as a measure of resilience in Eritrean refugees living in Ethiopia. Conflict and Health, 13(1), 3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Glück, T. M., Knefel, M., & Lueger-Schuster, B. (2017). A network analysis of anger, shame, proposed ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder, and different types of childhood trauma in foster care settings in a sample of adult survivors. European journal of psychotraumatology, 8(sup3).

  • Golino, H., Christensen, A. P., & Garrido, L. E. (2022). Invited Commentary: Exploratory graph analysis in Context. Revista Psicologia: Teoria E Prática, 24(3), ePTPPA14197–ePTPPA14197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golino, H. F., & Demetriou, A. (2017). Estimating the dimensionality of intelligence like data using exploratory graph analysis. Intelligence, 62, 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golino, H. F., & Epskamp, S. (2017). Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research. PloS One, 12(6), e0174035.

  • Golino, H., Lillard, A. S., Becker, I., & Christensen, A. P. (2021). Investigating the structure of the children’s concentration and Empathy Scale using exploratory graph analysis. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 2(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golino, H., Christensen, A. P., & Moulder, R. (2020a). EGAnet: Exploratory Graph Analysis: A framework for estimating the number of dimensions in multivariate data using network psychometrics. R package version 0.9.2.

  • Golino, H., Shi, D., Christensen, A. P., Garrido, L. E., Nieto, M. D., Sadana, et al. (2020b). Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: A simulation and tutorial. Psychological Methods, 25(3), 292–320.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grevenstein, D., Aguilar-Raab, C., Schweitzer, J., & Bluemke, M. (2016). Through the tunnel, to the light: Why sense of coherence covers and exceeds resilience, optimism, and self-compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 208–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grevenstein, D., & Bluemke, M. (2017). Longitudinal factor analysis and measurement invariance of sense of coherence and general self-efficacy in adolescence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(5), 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grevenstein, D., & Bluemke, M. (2022). Measurement invariance of the SOC-13 sense of coherence scale across gender and age groups. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(1), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1959). Introduction to facet design and analysis (pp. 130–132). North Holland. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Psychology, Brussels-1957.

  • Guttman, L., & Shye, S. (1978). Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences / S. Shye (Ed.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  • Guttman, R., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1998). Facet theory: Its development and current status. European Psychologist, 3(1), 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gysi, D. M., Voigt, A., de Miranda Fragoso, T., Almaas, E., & Nowick, K. (2018). wTO: An R package for computing weighted topological overlap and a consensus network with integrated visualization tool. Bmc Bioinformatics, 19, 392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hochwälder, J. (2019). Sense of coherence: Notes on some challenges for future research. SAGE Open, 9, 2158244019846687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmefur, M., Sundberg, K., Wettergren, L., & Langius-Eklöf, A. (2015). Measurement properties of the 13-item sense of coherence scale using Rasch analysis. Quality of Life Research, 24(6), 1455–1463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, K. J., de Jonge, H., van der Maas, H. L., Levine, S. Z., & Epskamp, S. (2020). How to compare psychometric factor and network models. Journal of Intelligence, 8(4), 35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Klepp, O. M., Mastekaasa, A., Sørensen, T., Sandanger, I., & Kleiner, R. (2007). Structure analysis of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence from an epidemiological mental health survey with a brief nine-item sense of coherence scale. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 16(1), 11–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kossakowski, J. J., Epskamp, S., Kieffer, J. M., van Borkulo, C. D., Rhemtulla, M., & Borsboom, D. (2016). The application of a network approach to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Introducing a new method for assessing HRQoL in healthy adults and cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 25(4), 781–792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lajunen, T. (2019). Cross-cultural evaluation of Antonovsky’s orientation to life questionnaire: Comparison between Australian, Finnish, and Turkish young adults. Psychological Reports, 122(2), 731–747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, A., & Krippner, S. (1998). Systems theories: Their origins, foundations, and development. In J. S. Jordan (Ed.), Systems theories and a priori aspects of perception (pp. 47–74). Elsevier Science.

  • Lerdal, A., Opheim, R., Gay, C. L., Moum, B., Fagermoen, M. S., & Kottorp, A. (2017). Psychometric limitations of the 13-item sense of coherence scale assessed by Rasch analysis. BMC Psychology, 5(1), 18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. (2005). Guttman, Louis. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (Vol. 2, pp. 175–188). Elsevier.

  • Lim, S. H., Oh, W. O., & Yeom, I. S. (2021). Validity and reliability of the sense of coherence scale among Korean adolescents with chronic Diseases. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 61, e22–e28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M., Bieda, A., & Margraf, J. (2019). Short form of the sense of coherence scale (SOC-L9) in the US, Germany, and Russia. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(5), 796–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahammadzadeh, A., Poursharifi, H., & Alipour, A. (2010). Validation of sense of coherence (SOC) 13-item scale in Iranian sample. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1451–1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, A. J., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 116–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutbeam, D., & Muscat, D. M. (2021). Health promotion glossary 2021. Health Promotion International, 36(6), 1578–1598.

  • Oliver, A. L., & Ebers, M. (2015). The analysis of conceptual fields: A synergistic application of facet theory and network analysis. Fifteenth International Facet Theory Conference, 2015, New York City.

  • Peralta, V., Gil-Berrozpe, G. J., Sánchez-Torres, A., & Cuesta, M. J. (2020). The network and dimensionality structure of affective psychoses: An exploratory graph analysis approach. Journal of Affective Disorders, 277, 182–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pons, P., & Latapy, M. (2005). Computing communities in large networks using random walks. In Computer and Information Sciences-ISCIS 2005: 20th International Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, October 26–28, 2005. Proceedings 20 (pp. 284–293). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

  • Rajesh, G., Eriksson, M., Pai, K., Seemanthini, S., Naik, D. G., & Rao, A. (2016). The validity and reliability of the sense of coherence scale among Indian university students. Global Health Promotion, 23(4), 16–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Sakano, J., & Yajima, Y. (2005). Factor structure of the SOC scale 13-item version in Japanese university students. [Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi] Japanese Journal of Public Health, 52(1), 34–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sardu, C., Mereu, A., Sotgiu, A., Andrissi, L., Jacobson, M. K., & Contu, P. (2012). Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: Cultural validation of SOC questionnaire and socio-demographic patterns in an Italian population. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 8, 1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmittmann, V. D., Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., Epskamp, S., Kievit, R. A., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena. New Ideas in Psychology, 31, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M., & Tellegen, A. (2019). Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1428–1441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Song, W. -M., Di Matteo, T., & Aste, T. (2012). Hierarchical information clustering by means of topologically embedded graphs. PLoS One, 7(3), e31929.

  • Spadoti Dantas, R. A., Silva, F. S., & Ciol, M. A. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Brazilian versions of the 29- and 13-item scales of the Antonovsky’s sense of coherence (SOC-29 and SOC-13) evaluated in Brazilian cardiac patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(1–2), 156–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tušl, M., Šípová, I., Máčel, M., Cetkovská, K., & Bauer, G. F. (2023). The sense of coherence scale (SOC-13): Psychometric properties in the Czech adult population and general recommendations for the advancement of the scale. PREPRINT (Version 1) Available at Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2723276/v1. 10 April 2023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinje, H. F., Langeland, E., & Bull, T. (2022). Aaron Antonovsky’s development of salutogenesis, 1979 to 1994. In M. B. Mittelmark, G. Bauer, L. Vaandrager, J. M. Pelikan, S. Sagy, M. Eriksson, B. Lindström, & C. Meier Magistretti (Eds.), The handbook of Salutogenesis (pp. 25–40). Springer.

  • Zimprich, D., Allemand, M., & Hornung, R. (2006). Measurement invariance of the abridged sense of coherence scale in adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(4), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.4.280

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any source of funding. We certify that all our affiliations with or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or material discussed in this manuscript (NIH, Wellcome Trust, HHMI and others).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Sardu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. None of the authors have competing interests to declare.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The procedures performed in our study involved human participants and received formal approval from the local Institutional Research Committee (Prot. N. 0148446–16/07/2020). All participants were informed about the goal, procedures, risks, benefits, and anonymity of data on the first page of the questionnaire. The study was conducted on a voluntary basis, and participants were free to stop filling out the questionnaire at any time and had the opportunity to contact the research team with questions. Participants were informed that voluntary participation in the survey was taken as implied consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Portoghese, I., Sardu, C., Bauer, G. et al. A network perspective to the measurement of sense of coherence (SOC): an exploratory graph analysis approach. Curr Psychol 43, 16624–16636 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05567-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05567-0

Navigation