Abstract
This study explored the relationship between the Big Five personality traits (BFPTs) and the self-regulation strategy of spontaneous mental contrasting (S.MC) among Chinese university students. Study 1 employed a cross-sectional correlational design. We hypothesized that positive relationships exist for conscientiousness, extraversion, and low neuroticism with spontaneous mental contrasting, whereas agreeableness and openness are unrelated to spontaneous mental contrasting regarding the Chinese context. The results did not support the hypotheses. However, Study 1 indicated that two sub-traits (compassion and responsibility) correlated positively with spontaneous mental contrasting. An experimental study (Study 2) was conducted to confirm these results. The results revealed that the two prosocial traits (compassion and responsibility) significantly predict spontaneous mental contrasting compared to neutral condition. These findings support the results of a prior study, which found that those who experienced more social responsibility toward others typically used spontaneous mental contrasting to achieve their social responsibility goals. These findings extended these results, as the participants in this study exhibited increased spontaneous mental contrasting with their academic goals when induced by responsibility and compassion. The results of this study imply that the prosocial traits increased the use of spontaneous mental contrasting and future interventional designs should integrate these traits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All dataset may be found via:
Study 1: https://osf.io/pv5xk/?view_only=9b8930a1927d4e20b745059ed0081206.
Study 2: https://osf.io/6pqgw/?view_only=02d7eea3af34445ca4868da94aaef96f.
References
Achtziger, A., Fehr, T., Oettingen, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Rockstroh, B. (2009). Strategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activity. Social Neuroscience, 4, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910801925350
Anwar, M. M., & Clauss, T. (2021). Personality traits and bricolage as drivers of sustainable social responsibility in family SMEs: A COVID‐19 perspective. Business and Society Review, 126, 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12222
Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352
Chen, B. (2016). Conscientiousness and everyday creativity among Chinese undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.061
Chen, Y., Wang, S., Liu, S., Hong, X., Zheng, J., Jiao, L., & Zhang, L. (2022). Belief in a just world and bullying defending behavior among adolescents: Roles of self-efficacy and responsibility. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03198-5
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R. M., Song, W., Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (1996). Development of the Chinese personality assessment inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022196272003
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zhang, J.-X., Sun, H.-F., Gan, Y.-Q., Song, W.-Z., & Xie, D. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the five-factor model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(4), 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032004003
Cheung, F. M., Fan, W., & To, C. W. (2008). The Chinese personality assessment inventory as a culturally relevant personality measure in applied settings. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00045.x
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J., & Leong, F. T. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. The American Psychologist, 66(7), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022389
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources
De la Fuente, J., Paoloni, P., Kauffman, D., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Sander, P., & Zapata, L. (2020). Big five, Self-regulation, and coping strategies as predictors of achievement emotions in undergraduate students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103602
Devos, T., Huynh, Q. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2012). Implicit self and identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 155–179). Guilford.
Dijksterhuis, A., Spears, R., Postmes, T., Stapel, D., Koomen, W., van Knippenberg, A., & Scheepers, D. (1998). Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 862–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.862
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025007614869
Ho, I. T. (2001). Are Chinese teachers authoritarian? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 99–115). Australian Council for Educational Research.
Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397103259443
Hu, X., Chen, S. X., Zhang, L., Yu, F., Peng, K., & Liu, L. (2018). Do Chinese traditional and modern cultures affect young adults’ moral priorities? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01799
Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.797
Kajonius, P. J. (2017). Cross-cultural personality differences between East Asia and Northern Europe in IPIP-NEO. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 3, 1–17. https://ijpp.rug.nl/article/view/25634.
Kappes, H. B., Oettingen, G., Mayer, D., & Maglio, S. (2011). Sad mood promotes self-initiated mental contrasting of future and reality. Emotion (Washington DC), 11(5), 1206–1222. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023983
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The big five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.019
Kumar, V., Dudani, R., & Latha, K. (2021). The big five personality traits and psychological biases: An exploratory study. Current Psychology, 42, 6587–6597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01999-8
Lan, X. (2023). Perceived parenting styles, cognitive flexibility, and prosocial behavior in Chinese Youth with an immigrant background: A three-group comparison. Current Psychology, 42, 20718–20736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03140-9
Lan, X., & Wang, W. (2022). Is early left-behind experience harmful to prosocial behavior of emerging adult? The role of parental autonomy support and mindfulness. Current Psychology, 41, 1842–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00706-3
Lievens, F., Coetsier, P., De Fruyt, F., & De Maeseneer, J. (2002). Medical students’ personality characteristics and academic performance: A five-factor model perspective. Medical Education, 36(11), 1050–1056. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01328.x
Lounsbury, J. W., Smith, R. M., Levy, J. J., Leong, F. T., & Gibson, L. W. (2009). Personality characteristics of business majors as defined by the big five and narrow personality traits. Journal of Education for Business, 84(4), 200–205. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.4.200-205
Mammadov, S. (2022). Big five personality traits and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality, 90(2), 222–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12663
Matthews, G., Schwean, V. L., Campbell, S. E., Saklofske, D. H., & Mohamed, A. A. R. (2000). Personality, self-regulation, and adaptation: A cognitive-social framework. In M. Boekarts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 171–207). Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50035-4
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). Guilford.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
McCrae, R. R., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2010). Self-regulation and the five-factor model of personality traits. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 145–168). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318111.ch7
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Pilar, D., Rolland, G. H., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(1), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198291009
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
Minkov, M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Schachner, M. (2019). A test of a new short big-five tool in large probabilistic samples from 19 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109519
Mok, S. Y., Bakaç, C., & Froehlich, L. (2021). My family’s goals are also my goals: The relationship between collectivism, distal utility value, and learning and career goals of international university students in Germany. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 21(2), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-020-09447-y
Oettingen G, Sevincer T, & Gollwitzer PM. (2008). Goal pursuit in the context of culture. In Sorrentino R. M., & Yamaguchi S. (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures. (pp. 191–211). San Diego: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2008
Oettingen, G. (2013). Foreseeing obstacles: Mental contrasting and intention formation. In G. Seebaß, P. Gollwitzer, & M. Schmitz (Eds.), Acting intentionally and its limits: Individuals, groups, institutions: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 163–192). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110284461.163
Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2010). Strategies of setting and implementing goals: Mental contrasting and implementation intentions. In J. E. Maddux & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of clinical psychology (pp. 114–135). Guilford Press.
Oettingen, G., Pak, H., & Schnetter, K. (2001). Self-regulation of goal setting: Turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 736–753. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.736
Oettingen, G., Mayer, D., & Brinkmann, B. (2010). Mental contrasting of future and reality: Managing the demands of everyday life in health care professionals. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(3), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000018
Oettingen, G., Marquardt, M. K., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012). Mental contrasting turns positive feedback on creative potential into successful performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 990–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.008
Oettingen, G., Schrage, J., & Gollwitze, P. M. (2016). Volition. In L. Corno, & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 104–117). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688244
Oiknine, A. H., Pollard, K. A., Khooshabeh, P., & Files, B. T. (2021). Need for cognition is positively related to promotion focus and negatively related to prevention focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 606847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.606847
Orghian, D., Smith, A., Garcia-Marques, L., & Heinke, D. (2017). Capturing spontaneous trait inference with the modified Free Association paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.004
Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434
Rowe, A. C., Shepstone, L., Carnelley, K. B., Cavanagh, K., & Millings, A. (2016). Attachment security and self-compassion priming increase the likelihood that first-time engagers in mindfulness meditation will continue with mindfulness training. Mindfulness, 7, 642–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0499-7
Russo, D., Masegosa, A. R., & Stol, K. J. (2022). From anecdote to evidence: The relationship between personality and need for cognition of developers. Empirical Software Engineer, 27, 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10106-1
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology volume 10 (pp. 221–279). Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
Sevincer, A. T., & Oettingen, G. (2013). Spontaneous mental contrasting and selective goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(9), 1240–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213492428
Sevincer, A. T., & Oettingen, G. (2021). Regulatory focus and thinking about the future versus reality. Motivation Science, 7(3), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000240
Sevincer, A. T., Kluge, L., & Oettingen, G. (2014). Implicit theories and motivational focus: Desired future versus present reality. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9359-0
Sevincer, A. T., Mehl, P. J., & Oettingen, G. (2017). Well self-regulated people use mental contrasting. Social Psychology, 48(6), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000322
Sevincer, A. T., Tessmann, P., & Oettingen, G. (2018). Demand to act and use of mental contrasting. Social Psychology, 49(6), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000353
Sevincer, A. T., Musik, T., Degener, A., Greinert, A., & Oettingen, G. (2020). Taking responsibility for others and use of mental contrasting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1219–1233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219898569
Song, Y., & Shi, M. (2017). Associations between empathy and big five personality traits among Chinese undergraduate medical students. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0171665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171665
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next big five inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
Tamim, M., Gai, X., Wang, G., & Ma, Y. (2022). The relationship between predominant promotion focus and spontaneous mental contrasting. Social Psychology, 53(6), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000507
Tett, R. P., Toich, M. J., & Ozkum, S. B. (2021). Trait activation theory: A review of the literature and applications to five lines of personality dynamics research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 199–233. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-062228
Tuten, T. L., & Bosnjak, M. (2001). Understanding differences in web usage: The role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29(4), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2001.29.4.391
Van Kleef, G. A., & Lelieveld, G. J. (2022). Moving the self and others to do good: The emotional underpinnings of prosocial behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.029
Vaughn, L. A., Baumann, J., & Klemann, C. (2008). Openness to experience and regulatory focus: Evidence of motivation from fit. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 886–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.008
Vedel, A., & Poropat, A. E. (2017). Personality and academic performance. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_989-1
Wallace, C., & Chen, G. (2006). A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation and performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 529–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00046.x
Wang, Y., Ang, C., Jiang, Z., & Wu, C. H. (2019). The role of trait extraversion in shaping proactive behavior: A multilevel examination of the impact of high-activated positive affect. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.035
Wang, G., Wang, Y., & Gai, X. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effects of mental contrasting with implementation intentions on goal attainment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 565202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.565202
Wang, L., Wang, Z., Liu, Q., Li, T., Shi, Y., & Luo, Z. (2022). Regulatory focus mediates the association between parenting behaviors and creativity among Chinese adolescents. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04071-1
Wen, X., Zhao, Y., Yang, Y. T., Wang, S., & Cao, X. (2021). Do students with different majors have different personality traits? Evidence from two Chinese agricultural universities. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 641333. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641333
Zhang, J. W., & Howell, R. T. (2011). Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits? Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.021
Zhang, G., Chen, X., Xiao, L., Li, Y., Li, B., Yan, Z., Guo, L., & Rost, D. H. (2019). The relationship between big five and self-control in boxers: A mediating model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1690. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01690
Zhang, X., Huang, P. F., Li, B. Q., Xu, W. J., Li, W. P., & Zhou, B. (2021). The influence of interpersonal relationships on school adaptation among Chinese university students during COVID-19 control period: Multiple mediating roles of social support and resilience. Journal of Affective Disorders, 285, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.040
Zhang, Y., Kohnstamm, G., Slotboom, A. M., Elphick, E., & Cheung, P. C. (2002). Chinese and Dutch parents’ perceptions of their children’s personality. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320209598675
Zhang, B., Li, Y. M., Li, J., Luo, J., Ye, Y., Yin, L., Chen, Z., Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2022). The big five inventory–2 in China: A comprehensive psychometric evaluation in four diverse samples. Assessment, 29(6), 1262–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211008245
Zhou, N., Lam, S. F., & Chan, K. C. (2012). The Chinese classroom paradox: A cross-cultural comparison of teacher controlling behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1162–1174. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027609
Zhou, Z., Qu, Y., & Li, X. (2022). Parental collectivism goals and Chinese adolescents’ prosocial behaviors: The mediating role of authoritative parenting. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(4), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01579-4
Acknowledgements
The help of Ying Wang with collecting data, and Dannuo Lv and Lin Wang with coding the data is gratefully acknowledged.
Funding
The study was supported by a grant from the Research Program Funds of the Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality at Beijing Normal University (2021-03-002-BZPK01) and Teacher Education Research Program Funds of Northeast Normal University (JSJY20180302).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MT developed the study concept, and design. Data analyses and interpretation were performed by MT under the mentorship of XG and GW. Data collection was performed under the mentorship of YM, and all of them approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The present research included human participants and the materials were designed in accordance with the ethical and academic regulations of Northeast Normal University, Number, 2021020.
The informed consent was as follows:
Dear classmates, this survey is carried out by the Academic Objectives Research Group of the School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University.
The purpose of this study is to understand the learning status and academic achievements of graduate students.
All materials in this study were designed in accordance with the ethical and academic regulations of Northeast Normal University. In addition, this study guarantees that all your information will remain anonymous and confidential.
Your answers will be helpful for the subsequent development of this study. After completing the task, each participant will receive a gift.
Please tick “√” on the following question.
I’d like to participate in this study:
o YES. o NO.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tamim, M., Wang, G., Gai, X. et al. Big five personality traits and spontaneous mental contrasting among Chinese students. Curr Psychol 43, 15459–15470 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05487-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05487-z