Abstract
Interpersonal relationships and behavioral problems are important aspects of children’s social development. This study investigated the relationships among parental nature orientation, children’s teacher–student relationships, peer relationships, and behavioral problems and examined the mediating role of children’s nature connectedness in these relationships through a longitudinal design. A sample of 398 children (Mage = 9.43 ± 0.87 years old) participated in this study. We acquired parental nature orientation and children’s nature connectedness data at the baseline survey (T1) and received information on children’s teacher–student relationships, peer relationships, and behavioral problems at T1 and at the10-month follow-up (T2). The mediation analyses were performed using bootstrapping. After controlling for children’s gender, age, grade, teacher–student relationships, peer relationships, and behavioral problems at T1, we found that parental nature orientation at T1 was positively related to children’s peer relationships at T2 and negatively correlated with children’s behavioral problems at T2. In addition, children’s nature connectedness at T1 fully mediated the relationship between parental nature orientation at T1 and children’s teacher–student relationships at T2. Our findings indicate that parents should maintain a positive nature orientation and focus on the guidance of children’s nature connectedness to improve children’s teacher–student relationships and peer relationships and reduce behavioral problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Aboagye, M. O., Qin, J., Pekárková, S., Antwi, C. O., Jababu, Y., Asare, K., & Akinyi, N. (2019). Factorial validity of the student–teacher relationship scale-short form, latent means comparison of teacher–student relationships quality and association with child problem and prosocial behaviors. Psychological Studies, 64(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-019-00488-0
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1978). The classification of child psychopathology: A review and analysis of empirical efforts. Psychological Bulletin, 85(6), 1275–1301. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.6.1275
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
Beets, M. W., Vogel, R., Chapman, S., Pitetti, K. H., & Cardinal, B. J. (2007). Parent’s social support for children’s outdoor physical activity: Do weekdays and weekends matter? Sex Roles, 56(1–2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9154-4
Bloemsma, L. D., Gehring, U., Klompmaker, J. O., Hoek, G., Janssen, N. A. H., Smit, H. A., Vonk, J. M., Brunekreef, B., Lebret, E., & Wijga, A. H. (2018). Green space visits among adolescents: Frequency and predictors in the PIAMA birth cohort study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 126(4), Article047016. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp2429
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
Brügger, A., Kaiser, F. G., & Roczen, N. (2011). One for all? Connectedness to nature, inclusion of nature, environmental identity, and implicit association with nature. European Psychologist, 16(4), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000032
Cervinka, R., Röderer, K., & Hefler, E. (2012). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311416873
Cheng, J., & Monroe, M. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510385082
Choe, D. (2021). Longitudinal relationships amongst child neglect, social relationships, and school dropout risk for culturally and linguistically diverse adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 112, Article104891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104891
Clayton, S., Irkhin, B. D., & Nartova-Bochaver, S. K. (2019). Environmental identity in Russia: Validation and relationship to the concern for people and plants. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 16(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2019-1-85-107
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In: M. Lamb & C. Garcia-Coll (Eds.) and R.M Lerner (Vol. Ed). Handbook of child psychology (7th ed., pp. 610–656). Wiley.
Eoh, Y., Lee, E., & Park, S. H. (2022). The relationship between children’s school adaptation, academic achievement, happiness, and problematic smartphone usage: Amultiple informant moderated mediating model. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(6), 3579–3593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10080-w
Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W. (2015). Costs and benefits of children’s physical and relational aggression trajectories on peer rejection, acceptance, and friendships: Variations by aggression subtypes, gender, and age. Developmental Psychology, 51(12), 1756–1770. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000057
Evans, J., & Pellegrini, A. (1997). Surplus energy theory: An enduring but inadequate justification for school break-time. Educational Review, 49(3), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191970490302
Friedman, S., Imrie, S., Fink, E., Gedikoglu, M., & Hughes, C. (2022). Understanding changes to children’s connection to nature during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for child well-being. People and Nature, 4(1), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10270
Fyfe-Johnson, A. L., Saelens, B. E., Christakis, D. A., & Tandon, P. S. (2019). Physical activity and parental attitudes and beliefs of children attending a nature preschool. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 6(3), 3–17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1225656.pdf
Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649
Gu, X., Huang, B. Y., & Wu, J. P. (2022). Family members’ attitudes toward nature-based activities and children’s environmental behaviors: The chain-mediating effect of children’s frequency of contact with nature and connection to nature. China Journal of Health Psychology, 30(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2022.01.017
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Izenstark, D., & Ebata, A. T. (2022). Why families go outside: An exploration of mothers’ and daughters’ family-based nature activities. Leisure Sciences, 44(5), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2019.1625293
Jiang, M. M., Gao, K., Wu, Z. Y., & Guo, P. P. (2022). The influence of academic pressure on adolescents’ problem behavior: Chain mediating effects of self-control, parent–child conflict, and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article954330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954330
Jiménez-Iglesias, A., García-Moya, I., & Moreno, C. (2017). Parent–child relationships and adolescents’ life satisfaction across the first decade of the new millennium. Family Relations, 66, 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12249
Jose, P. E. (2016). The merits of using longitudinal mediation. Educational Psychologist, 51(3–4), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207175
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Kou, J., Du, Y., & Xia, L. (2007). Formulation of children strengths and difficulties questionnaire (the edition for students) for Shanghai norm. China Journal of Health Psychology, 15(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-1252.2007.01.035
Krishnakumar, A., & Black, M. M. (2002). Longitudinal predictors of competence among African American children: The role of distal and proximal risk factors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23(3), 237–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(02)00106-5
Laaksoharju, T., Rappe, E., & Kaivola, T. (2012). Garden affordances for social learning, play, and for building nature-child relationship. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.01.003
Magro, S. W., Fraley, R. C., & Roisman, G. I. (2020). Early maternal sensitivity and teacher–student relationships quality across grade school: Enduring or transient associations? Child Development, 91(4), 883–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13322
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
Montalva-Valenzuela, F., Andrades-Ramírez, O., & Castillo-Paredes, A. (2022). Effects of physical activity, exercise and sport on executive function in young people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 12(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe12010006
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
Mygind, L., Kjeldsted, E., Hartmeyer, R., Mygind, E., Bølling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2019). Mental, physical and social health benefits of immersive nature-experience for children and adolescents: A systematic review and quality assessment of the evidence. Health & Place, 58, Article102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.05.01
Ogg, J. A., Anthony, C. J., Malecki, C. K., Demaray, M. K., Kelly, K. M., Menter, K., Rodriguez-Harris, D., & Riffle, L. N. (2021). Bidirectional associations between biased language exposure and school-based relationships across gender. Journal of School Psychology, 89, 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.09.005
Pianta, R. C. (1994). Patterns of relationships between children and kindergarten teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 32(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(94)90026-4
Pickren, S. E., Harriott, E. M., Huerta, N. B., & Cutting, L. E. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on children’s attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptomology, daily life, and problem behavior during virtual learning. Mind, Brain and Education, 16(4), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12337
Plutchik, R. (1997). The circumplex as a general model of the structure of emotions and personality. In R. Plutchik & H. R. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotions (pp. 17–45). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10261-001
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879
Price, E., Maguire, S., Firth, C., Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Young, R. (2022). Factors associated with nature connectedness in school-aged children. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRESP.2022.100037
Putra, I. G. N. E., Astell-Burt, T., Cliff, D. P., Vella, S. A., & Feng, X. (2021). Association between green space quality and prosocial behaviour: A 10-year multilevel longitudinal analysis of Australian children. Environmental Research, 196, Article110334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110334
Roberts, A., Hinds, J., & Camic, P. (2019). Nature activities and well-being in children and young people: A systematic review. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 20(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2019.1660195
Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
Simsar, A. (2021). Young children’s ecological footprint awareness and environmental attitudes in Turkey. Child Indicators Research, 14(4), 1387–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09810-7
Sobko, T., & Brown, G. T. L. (2021). The Influence of connectedness to nature on psychological well-being: Evidence from the randomized controlled trial Play & Grow. Challenges, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe12010012
Sobko, T., Jia, Z., & Brown, G. (2018). Measuring connectedness to nature in preschool children in an urban setting and its relation to psychological functioning. Plos one, 13(11), Article0207057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207057
Soga, M., Yamanoi, T., Tsuchiya, K., Koyanagi, T. F., & Kanai, T. (2018). What are the drivers of and barriers to children’s direct experiences of nature? Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.01
Ulrich, R.S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altman, I., Wohlwill, J.F. (eds), Behavior and the Natural Environment: vol 6 : Human Behavior and Environment (pp. 85–125). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4
United Nations Children’s Fund (Ed.) (2018). Shaping urbanization for children: A handbook on child-responsive urban planning. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://www.unicef.cn/media/9196/file/ShapingUrbanizationforChildrenHandbook.pdf
Wang, H. (2013). The relationship of parent rearing patterns, peer relationships and pathological internet use of left-behind secondary school students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Center China Normal University.
Wang, Y., Long, J., Liu, Y., Liu, T., & Billieux, J. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Chinese SUPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale: Factor structure and measurement invariance across gender and age. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, Article529949. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYT.2020.529949
Zhou, H., & Long, L. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6), 942–950. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2004.06.018
Zhu, Q., Cheong, Y., Wang, C., & Sun, C. (2022). The roles of resilience, peer relationships, teacher–student relationships on student mental health difficulties during COVID-19. School Psychology (washington, d.c.), 37(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/SPQ0000492
Zou, H., Qu, Z. Y., & Ye, Y. (2007). The characteristics of teacher–student relationships and its relationship with school adjustment of students. Psychological Deve Lopment and Education, 23(4), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4918.2007.04.014
Funding
This research was supported by the Beijing Education Science Planning Project (BJAA22064) to Zhihui Yang, the Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (22YJC190025) to Xiao Yu and the Fund of Key Laboratory of Modern Teaching Technology, Ministry of Education, P. R. China to Xiao Yu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Xiaoyan Chen & Xiao Yu contributed to conceptualization, design, data analysis, and manuscript drafting and editing. Lifei Lu and Tianci Zhang contributed to acquisition and collation of data. Zhihui Yang contributed to interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
We received approval from the Beijing Forestry University’s Research Ethics Committee.
Consent
We obtained informed consent from the children and their parents. Each participant received a gift at the end of the survey as compensation for their time.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Xiaoyan Chen and Xiao Yu are co-first authors.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Yu, X., Lu, L. et al. Parental nature orientation and children’s interpersonal relationships and behavioral problems: The mediating role of children’s nature connectedness. Curr Psychol 43, 13598–13607 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05316-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05316-3