Abstract
This study explores the impact of trait anxiety on reactive control, a cognitive process involving the resolution of cognitive conflicts and behavior modification based on task-related information. While prior research has focused on the influence of anxiety on proactive control, which involves preparatory attention to task-related cues, the investigation of trait anxiety's impact on reactive control is relatively novel. Reactive control relies on immediate and flexible access to task-related information. The study employs Event-Related Potentials (ERP) methodology to observe changes in brain electrical activity in response to different tasks or stimuli. By examining how individuals with varying levels of trait anxiety process task-related information, the research aims to shed light on the effects of anxiety on cognitive control processes and overall performance outcomes. This paper's unique contribution lies in the investigation of the impact of trait anxiety on reactive control, an area that has received limited attention in previous studies, using ERP methodology. The findings indicate that individuals with high trait anxiety exhibit impaired reactive control, which has implications for understanding the cognitive characteristics associated with anxiety. These results have relevance for both the field of psychology and a general psychological audience, as they contribute to our understanding of how anxiety influences cognitive processes and highlight potential areas for intervention and support for individuals with high trait anxiety.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Anderson, P., He, X., Buehler, C., Teney, D., Johnson, M., Gould, S., & Zhang, L. (2018). Bottom-up and top-down attention for image captioning and visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 6077–6086). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2018.00636
Anser, M. K., Khan, M. A., Zaman, K., Nassani, A. A., Askar, S. E., Abro, M. M. Q., & Kabbani, A. (2021). Financial development during COVID-19 pandemic: The role of coronavirus testing and functional labs. Financial Innovation, 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00226-4
Aron, A. R. (2007). The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. The Neuroscientist, 13(3), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858407299288
Atalay, N. B., & Misirlisoy, M. (2012). Can contingency learning alone account for item-specific control? Evidence from within-and between-language ISPC effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1578. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028458
Bailey, K., West, R., & Anderson, C. A. (2010). A negative association between video game experience and proactive cognitive control. Psychophysiology, 47(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00925.x
Bélanger, S., Belleville, S., & Gauthier, S. (2010). Inhibition impairments in Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and healthy aging: Effect of congruency proportion in a Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.021
Berggren, N., & Derakshan, N. (2013). Attentional control deficits in trait anxiety: Why you see them and why you don’t. Biological Psychology, 92(3), 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.007
Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(12), 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003
Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402(6758), 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/46035
Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. Variation in Working Memory, 75, 106. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168648.003.0004
Bugg, J. M. (2014). Evidence for the sparing of reactive cognitive control with age. Psychology and Aging, 29(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035270
Bugg, J. M., & Crump, M. J. (2012). In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: A review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367
Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Chanani, S. (2011). Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 844. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019957
Chen, A., Bailey, K., Tiernan, B. N., & West, R. (2011). Neural correlates of stimulus and response interference in a 2–1 mapping stroop task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 80(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.02.012
Chouiter, L., Dieguez, S., Annoni, J. M., & Spierer, L. (2014). High and low stimulus-driven conflict engage segregated brain networks, not quantitatively different resources. Brain Topography, 27, 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0303-0
Coderre, E., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W. J. (2011). Electrophysiological measures of conflict detection and resolution in the Stroop task. Brain Research, 1413, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.07.017
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn755
Deng, L., Ye, Q., Xu, D., Sun, W., & Jiang, G. (2022). A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00345-6
Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance: New developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist, 14(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.168
Derakshan, N., Ansari, T. L., Hansard, M., Shoker, L., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness: An investigation using the antisaccade task. Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.48
Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task. NeuroImage, 24(2), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.007
Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6(6), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
Fales, C. L., Barch, D. M., Burgess, G. C., Schaefer, A., Mennin, D. S., Gray, J. R., & Braver, T. S. (2008). Anxiety and cognitive efficiency: Differential modulation of transient and sustained neural activity during a working memory task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(3), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.8.3.239
Grassi, L., & Fantaccini, S. (2022). An overview of Fintech applications to solve the puzzle of health care funding: State-of-the-art in medical crowdfunding. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00388-9
Hanslmayr, S., Pastötter, B., Bäuml, K. H., Gruber, S., Wimber, M., & Klimesch, W. (2008). The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20020
Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(3), 638–644. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196526
Jiang, H., Huang, C., Li, Z., Wang, Q., Liang, W., & Zhou, A. (2023). Conflict Experience Regulates the Neural Encoding of Cognitive Conflict. Brain Sciences, 13(6), 880.
Krug, M. K., & Carter, C. S. (2012). Proactive and reactive control during emotional interference and its relationship to trait anxiety. Brain Research, 1481, 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.08.045
Larson, M. J., Kaufman, D. A., & Perlstein, W. M. (2009). Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 663–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.013
Li, G., Wang, S., Duan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2013). Perceptual conflict-induced late positive complex in a modified Stroop task. Neuroscience Letters, 542, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.056
Li, Y., Kou, G., Li, G., & Peng, Y. (2022). Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network. European Journal of Operational Research, 303(2), 790–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.040
Liotti, M., Woldorff, M. G., Perez, R., III., & Mayberg, H. S. (2000). An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia, 38(5), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00106-2
Lowe, D. G., & Mitterer, J. O. (1982). Selective and divided Attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology/revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 36(4), 684. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080661
Minnick, M. R., Pérez-Edgar, K. E., & Soto, J. A. (2020). A disruption in the balance of attentional systems plays a role in trait anxiety. Brain Sciences, 10(10), 761. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10100761
Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., Acosta, A., Callejas, A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Attention and anxiety: Different attentional functioning under state and trait anxiety. Psychological Science, 21(2), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609359624
Qiu, J., Luo, Y., Wang, Q., Zhang, F., & Zhang, Q. (2006). Brain mechanism of Stroop interference effect in Chinese characters. Brain Research, 1072(1), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.029
Richmond, L. L., Redick, T. S., & Braver, T. S. (2015). Remembering to prepare: The benefits (and costs) of high working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1764. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000122
Schmid, P. C., Kleiman, T., & Amodio, D. M. (2015). Neural mechanisms of proactive and reactive cognitive control in social anxiety. Cortex, 70, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.030
Soutschek, A., & Schubert, T. (2013). Domain-specific control mechanisms for emotional and nonemotional conflict processing. Cognition, 126(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.004
Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the state trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06496-000
Stock, A. K., Steenbergen, L., Colzato, L., & Beste, C. (2016). The system neurophysiological basis of non-adaptive cognitive control: Inhibition of implicit learning mediated by right prefrontal regions. Human Brain Mapping, 37(12), 4511–4522. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23325
Stroop, J. R. (1992). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.1.15
Sun, J., Sun, B., Zhang, L., Luo, Q., & Gong, H. (2013). Correlation between hemodynamic and electrophysiological signals dissociates neural correlates of conflict detection and resolution in a Stroop task: A simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy and event-related potential study. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 18(9), 096014–096014. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.9.096014
Szűcs, D., & Soltész, F. (2008). The interaction of task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features in the number/size congruency paradigm: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1190, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.010
Van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002). The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: FMRI and ERP studies. Physiology & Behavior, 77(4–5), 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00930-7
Van Veen, V., Cohen, J. D., Botvinick, M. M., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2001). Anterior cingulate cortex, conflict monitoring, and levels of processing. NeuroImage, 14(6), 1302–1308. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0923
West, R., Bowry, R., & McConville, C. (2004). Sensitivity of medial frontal cortex to response and nonresponse conflict. Psychophysiology, 41(5), 739–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00205.x
Zhu, J., Li, J., Li, X., Rao, J., Hao, Y., Ding, Z., & Wang, G. (2018). Neural basis of the emotional conflict processing in major depression: ERPs and source localization analysis on the N450 and P300 components. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00214
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, B., Xiang, L. Reactive control and trait anxiety: A novel investigation using event-related potential methodology. Curr Psychol 43, 7655–7666 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05147-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05147-2