Skip to main content
Log in

Protean career orientation, supervisor perceptions and organizational career growth: a moderated mediation model

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protean career orientation is important for people to achieve career development in the unstable career environment, but less is known about how this orientation affects one’s career development within the organizational context. Based on trait activation theory and leader-member exchange theory, this study explored the mediating roles of supervisor perceptions (i.e., supervisor-perceived employee-organization fit and supervisor-perceived proactive employee behavior) and the moderating role of job autonomy in the relationship between employee’s protean career orientation and organizational career growth. Using a leader-member dyad data from 760 questionnaires, we found support for the mediating effects of supervisor-perceived employee-organization fit and proactive employee behavior. Our findings also showed that job autonomy weakened the mediating effect of supervisor-perceived proactive employee behaviors on the relationship between protean career orientation and organizational career growth. By taking an interactionist perspective, this study contributes to the literatures on protean career orientation and organizational career growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.

References

  • Abessolo, M., Hirschi, A., & Rossier, J. (2017). Work values underlying protean and boundaryless career orientations. Career Development International, 22(3), 241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.

  • Alcover, C. M., Rico, R., Turnley, W. H., & Bolino, M. C. (2017). Understanding the changing nature of psychological contracts in 21st century organizations: A multiple-foci exchange relationships approach and proposed framework. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(1), 4–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (2001). Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and applications. SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10-country comparison. Applied Psychology, 49(1), 192–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagdadli, S., & Gianecchini, M. (2019). Organizational career management practices and objective career success: A systematic review and framework. Human Resource Management Review, 29(3), 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human performance, 18(4), 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, Y. (2014). The development and validation of a measure for protean career orientation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(19), 2702–2723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, Y., Szűcs, N., & Gunz, H. (2015). Career studies in search of theory: The rise and rise of concepts. Career Development International, 20(1), 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, Y., & Vardi, Y. (2016). A fresh look at the dark side of contemporary careers: Toward a realistic discourse. British Journal of Management, 27(2), 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, Y., Wordsworth, R., Mills, C., & Wright, S. (2016). Career and work attitudes of blue-collar workers, and the impact of a natural disaster chance event on the relationships between intention to quit and actual quit behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 459–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2015). The Oxford handbook of leader-member exchange. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belschak, F. D., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2011). Pro-self, prosocial, and pro‐organizational foci of proactive behaviour: Differential antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 475–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, J. P., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2009). The “new career” and organizational commitment: Do boundaryless and protean attitudes make a difference? Career Development International, 14(3), 242–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, J. P., & Hall, D. T. (2006). The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers: Combinations and implications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D. T., & DeMuth, R. L. F. (2006). Protean and boundaryless careers: An empirical exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 30–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D. T., & Mayrhofer, W. (2012). Careers around the world: Individual and contextual perspectives. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology And Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 349–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerdin, J. L., & Le Pargneux, M. (2014). The impact of expatriates’ career characteristics on career and job satisfaction, and intention to leave: An objective and subjective fit approach. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(14), 2033–2049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Chow, I. H. S. (1999). Subcultures in greater China: A comparison of managerial values in the people’s Republic of China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 16(3), 369–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chui, H., Li, H., & Ngo, H. Y. (2022). Linking protean career orientation with career optimism: Career adaptability and career decision self-efficacy as mediators. Journal of Career Development, 49(1), 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogliser, C. C., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2000). Exploring work unit context and leader – member exchange: A multi-level perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 487–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortellazzo, L., Bonesso, S., Gerli, F., & Batista-Foguet, J. M. (2020). Protean career orientation: Behavioral antecedents and employability outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116,

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawshaw, J. R., Van Dick, R., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2012). Opportunity, fair process, and relationship value: Career development as a driver of proactive work behaviour. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(1), 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, P., Macpherson, J., & Hood, M. (2011). Predictors of “new economy” career orientation in an australian sample of late adolescents. Journal of Career Development, 38(5), 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., Wolff, H. G., Forret, M. L., & Sullivan, S. E. (2020). Networking via LinkedIn: An examination of usage and career benefits. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118,

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, A., & Soens, N. (2008). Protean attitude and career success: The mediating role of self-management. Journal of Vocational behavior, 73(3), 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, J., Qiao, P., Wang, J., & Huang, H. (2022). Impact of food safety supervision efficiency on preventing and controlling mass public crisis. Frontiers in Public Health, 10,

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A Meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epitropaki, O., Marstand, A. F., Van der Heijden, B., Bozionelos, N., Mylonopoulos, N., Van der Heijde, C., Indicator Group. (2021). What are the career implications of “seeing eye to eye”? Examining the role of leader–member exchange (LMX) agreement on employability and career outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 74(4), 799–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatima, T., Jameel, I., & Mushtaq, R. (2022). How careerists use LMX as a strategy to achieve power and career success? A moderated mediation model. Eurasian Business Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-022-00216-1

  • Fay, D., & Sonnentag, S. (2012). Within-person fluctuations of proactive behavior: How affect and experienced competence regulate work behavior. Human Performance, 25(1), 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. M. (1986). A note on the statistical correction of halo error. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 173–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, F. D. (1981). Evaluating Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational behavior, 65(1), 14–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B., Jr., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, K. A., Dust, S. B., & Ziegert, J. C. (2018). Supervisor-employee power distance incompatibility, gender similarity, and relationship conflict: A test of interpersonal interaction theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 334–346.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). 7 redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubler, M., Arnold, J., & Coombs, C. (2014). Reassessing the protean career concept: Empirical findings, conceptual components, and measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S23–S40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulyani, G., & Bhatnagar, J. (2017). Mediator analysis of passion for work in indian millennials: Relationship between protean career attitude and proactive work behavior. Career Development International, 22(1), 50–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. T. (2002). Careers in and out organizations. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. T. (2004). The protean career: A quarter-century journey. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. T., Yip, J., & Doiron, K. (2018). Protean careers at work: Self-direction and values orientation in psychological success. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 129–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamstra, M. R., Van Vianen, A. E., & Koen, J. (2019). Does employee perceived person-organization fit promote performance? The moderating role of supervisor perceived person-organization fit. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(5), 594–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, A. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution: Issues and implications for career research and practice. The Career Development Quarterly, 66(3), 192–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, A., Jaensch, V. K., & Herrmann, A. (2016). Protean career orientation, vocational identity, and self-efficacy: An empirical clarification of their relationship. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(2), 208–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, A., & Koen, J. (2021). Contemporary career orientations and career self-management: A review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103505

  • Hofstetter, H., & Rosenblatt, Z. (2017). Predicting protean and physical boundaryless career attitudes by work importance and work alternatives: Regulatory focus mediation effects. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(15), 2136–2158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtschlag, C., Masuda, A., Reiche, B. S., & Morales, C. (2019). Why do millennials stay in their jobs? The roles of protean career orientation, goal progress and organizational career management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 103366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103366

  • Hornung, S. (2018). Idiosyncratic deals at work: A conceptual and empirical review. Eurasian Business Perspectives.

  • Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Weigl, M., Mueller, A., & Glaser, J. (2014). Redesigning work through idiosyncratic deals. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(4), 608–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L., Krasikova, D. V., & Harms, P. D. (2020). Avoiding or embracing social relationships? A conservation of resources perspective of leader narcissism, leader–member exchange differentiation, and follower voice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(1), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johlke, M. C., & Iyer, R. (2013). A model of retail job characteristics, employee role ambiguity, external customer mind-set, and sales performance. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(1), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joo, B. K., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2014). Employee creativity: The effects of perceived learning culture, leader–member exchange quality, job autonomy, and proactivity. Human Resource Development International, 17(3), 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2017). The role of unemployment in the rise in alternative work arrangements. American Economic Review, 107(5), 388–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatri, N. (2009). Consequences of power distance orientation in organisations. Vision, 13(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B., Rhee, E., Ha, G., Jung, S. H., Cho, D., Lee, H. K., & Lee, S. M. (2016). Cross-cultural validation of the career growth scale for korean employees. Journal of Career Development, 43(1), 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2017). Directing our own careers, but getting help from empowering leaders. Career Development International, 22(3), 300–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Bravo, J. (2011). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational support for development: The critical role of career opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 485–500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubicek, B., Paskvan, M., & Bunner, J. (2017). The bright and dark sides of job autonomy. Job demands in a changing world of work (pp. 45–63). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. W., Burch, T. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (2014). The story of why we stay: A review of job embeddedness. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behvaior, 1(1), 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. S., Goering, D. D., Montanye, M. R., & Su, R. (2022). Understanding the career and job outcomes of contemporary career attitudes within the context of career environments: An integrative meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(2), 286–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2018). Linking protean career orientation to well-being: The role of psychological capital. Career Development International, 23(2), 178–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 15, 47–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lips-Wiersma, M., & Hall, D. T. (2007). Organizational career development is not dead: A case study on managing the new career during organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(6), 771–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochab, A., & Nath, V. (2019). Proactive personality, goal orientation and meta-skills as predictors of protean and boundaryless career attitudes. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 9(1), 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J. G., Brockner, J., Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2017). The dark side of experiencing job autonomy: Unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, S. T., Schweitzer, L., & Ng, E. S. (2015). Resilience in the modern career. Career Development International, 20(4), 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage.

  • Mendonca, M., & Kanungo, R. N. (1994). Managing human resources. Journal of Management Inquiry, 3(2), 189–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36(1), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., Delaney-Klinger, K., & Hemingway, M. A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 399–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nahrgang, J. D., & Seo, J. J. (2015). How and why high leader–member exchange (LMX) relationshipsdevelop: Examining the antecedents of LMX. In T. N. Bauer & B. Erdogan (Eds.), The Oxfordhandbook of leader-member exchange (pp. 87–118). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 447–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piasentin, K. A., & Chapman, D. S. (2007). Perceived similarity and complementarity as predictors of subjective person-organization fit. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redondo, R., Sparrow, P., & Hernández-Lechuga, G. (2021). The effect of protean careers on talent retention: Examining the relationship between protean career orientation, organizational commitment, job satisfaction and intention to quit for talented workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(9), 2046–2069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resick, C. J., Baltes, B. B., & Shantz, C. W. (2007). Person-organization fit and work-related attitudes and decisions: Examining interactive effects with job fit and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, R., Guest, D., & Budjanovcanin, A. (2016). Bounded or boundaryless? An empirical investigation of career boundaries and boundary crossing. Work Employment and Society, 30(4), 669–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 395–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Supeli, A., & Creed, P. A. (2016). The longitudinal relationship between protean career orientation and job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intention-to-quit. Journal of Career Development, 43(1), 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., Simonet, D. V., Walser, B., & Brown, C. (2013). Trait activation theory: Applications, further developments, and implications for workplace fit. Hand Book of personality at work (pp. 71–100). Book Now Ltd.

  • Tett, R. P., Toich, M. J., & Ozkum, S. B. (2021). Trait activation theory: A review of the literature and applications to five lines of personality dynamics research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 199–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (1998). International Management in China: Cross-cultural issues. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng, Q., & McElroy, J. C. (2012). Organizational career growth, affective occupational commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 256–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng, Q., & Xi, Y. (2011). Career growth study: Scale development and validity test. Management Review, 22(10), 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng, Q., & Zhu, L. (2020). Individuals’ career growth within and across organizations: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Career Development, 47(3), 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiernik, B. M., & Kostal, J. W. (2019). Protean and boundaryless career orientations: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(3), 280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. H., Luksyte, A., & Parker, S. K. (2015). Overqualification and subjective well-being at work: The moderating role of job autonomy and culture. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), 917–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L., Flores, L. Y., Weng, Q., & Li, J. (2021). Testing a moderated mediation model of turnover intentions with chinese employees. Journal of Career Development, 48(6), 893–909.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72201138).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in our study was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Questionnaire for supervisor

figure a

Appendix 2: Questionnaire for subordinate

figure b

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Gao, Y. Protean career orientation, supervisor perceptions and organizational career growth: a moderated mediation model. Curr Psychol 43, 8913–8930 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05021-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05021-1

Keywords

Navigation