Abstract
Viewpoint dependency in dynamic events is still an open question. Movies present a unique case of complex visual stimuli where consecutive shots are filmed from multiple viewpoints. In the present study, we have examined whether people remember viewpoint-specific information in movie-like visual scenes. We have used naturalistic activities which involved two actors where a) the sequence is presented from one or both actors’ viewpoints and b) the individual actions were in a natural order or they were scrambled. The results indicated that memory for individual shots decreased when the sequence was presented from both actors’ perspectives. Also, people were mostly unaware of the order manipulation, and reordering the individual actions did not lead to a decrease in memory performance. The results favor the film-form model, which suggests that the spatial relations in movie scenes are represented by taking the first shot of a scene as the basis and incorporating the views in subsequent shots accordingly. This argues for an economical encoding in visual events, which favors narrative continuity over spatial relations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data and analyses scripts have been made publicly available via the Open Science Framework and can be accessed at http://osf.io/qx5hd
References
Allen, G. L., Siegel, A. W., & Rosinski, R. R. (1978). The role of perceptual context in structuring spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.617
Angelone, B. L., Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (2003). The Relationship between change detection and recognition of centrally attended objects in motion pictures. Perception, 32(8), 947–962. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5079
Baker, L. J., & Levin, D. T. (2015). The role of relational triggers in event perception. Cognition, 136, 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.030
Bientzle, M., Eggeling, M., Kanzleiter, M., Thieme, K., & Kimmerle, J. (2021). The impact of narrative writing on empathy, perspective-taking, and attitude: Two randomized controlled experiments on violations of Covid-19 protection regulations. PLoS One, 16(7), e0254501.
Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. Routledge.
Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (1986). Film art: An introduction (2nd ed.). Knopf.
Brich, I. R., Bause, I. M., Hesse, F. W., & Wesslein, A.-K. (2021). How spatial information structuring in an interactive technological environment affects decision performance under working memory load. Computers in Human Behavior, 123, 106860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106860
Cavallo, A., Ansuini, C., Capozzi, F., Tversky, B., & Becchio, C. (2017). When far becomes near: Perspective taking induces social remapping of spatial relations. Psychological Science, 28(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616672464
Claus, B., & Kelter, S. (2006). Comprehending narratives containing flashbacks: Evidence for temporally organized representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1031–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1031
Cohn-Sheehy, B. I., Delarazan, A. I., Crivelli-Decker, J. E., Reagh, Z. M., Mundada, N. S., Yonelinas, A. P., Zacks, J. M., & Ranganath, C. (2022). Narratives bridge the divide between distant events in episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 50(3), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01178-x
Cutting, J. E. (2021). Movies on our minds: The evolution of cinematic engagement. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197567777.001.0001
Cutting, J. E., Brunick, K. L., & Candan, A. (2012). Perceiving Event Dynamics and parsing Hollywood films. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1476–1490. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027737
David, N., Bewernick, B., Cohen, M., Newen, A., Lux, S., Fink, G., ... Vogeley, K. (2006). Neural representations of self versus other: Visual-spatial perspective taking and agency in a virtual ball-tossing game. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(6), 898–910
Del Sette, P., Bindemann, M., & Ferguson, H. J. (2022). Visual perspective-taking in complex natural scenes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2016), 75(8), 1541–1551. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211054474
Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8(4), 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00442.x
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: The role of load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 73–83.
Franklin, N., Tversky, B., & Coon, V. (1992). Switching points of view in spatial mental models. Memory & Cognition, 20(5), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199583
Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94(4), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.427
Garsoffky, B., Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2007). Changing viewpoints during dynamic events. Perception, 36(3), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5645
Garsoffky, B., Schwan, S., & Hesse, F. W. (2002). Viewpoint dependency in the recognition of dynamic scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1035–1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1035
Hitch, G., Allen, R. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2019). Attention and binding in visual working memory: Two forms of attention and two kinds of buffer storage. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 82, 280–293.
Huff, M., Jahn, G., & Schwan, S. (2009). Tracking multiple objects across abrupt viewpoint changes. Visual Cognition, 17(3), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280802061838
Huff, M., Schwan, S., & Garsoffky, B. (2011). When movement patterns turn into events: Implications for the recognition of spatial configurations from different viewpoints. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.541152
Hutson, J. P., Smith, Tim J., Magliano, J. P., & Loschky, L. C. (2017). What is the role of the film viewer? The effects of narrative comprehension and viewing task on gaze control in film. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1).
Hutson, J. P., Chandran, P., Magliano, J. P., Smith, T. J., & Loschky, L. C. (2022). Narrative comprehension guides eye movements in the absence of motion. Cognitive Science, 46(5), e13131. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13131
Hymel, A., Levin, D. T., & Baker, L. J. (2016). Default processing of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000082
Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., & Capistrano, C. G. (2013). Visual search and location probability learning from variable perspectives. Journal of Vision, 13(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.6.13
Lawrence, M. A. (2016). ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. Retrieved June 13, 2022 from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ez
Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 501–506. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214339
Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (2000). Fragmentation and continuity in motion pictures and the real world. Media Psychology, 2(4), 357–380.
Levin, D. T., & Wang, C. (2009). Spatial Representation in Cognitive Science and Film Projections, 3, 24–52. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2009.030103
Loschky, L. C., Larson, A. M., Smith, T. J., & Magliano, J. P. (2020). The scene perception & event comprehension theory (SPECT) applied to visual narratives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 311–351.
Magliano, J. P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544973
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 43–71). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2010). Event perception. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2(6), 608–620.
Raisig, S., Welke, T., Hagendorf, H., & van der Meer, E. (2010). I spy with my little eye: Detection of temporal violations in event sequences and the pupillary response. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 76, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.01.006
R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Retrieved June 13, 2022 from http://www.R-project.or
Rey, G. D. (2014). Seductive details and attention distraction – An eye tracker experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.017
Ruby, P., Sirigu, A., & Decety, J. (2002). Distinct areas in parietal cortex involved in long-term and short-term action planning: A PET investigation. Cortex, 38, 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70663-4
Sargent, J. Q., Zacks, J. M., Hambrick, D. Z., & Lin, N. (2019). Event memory uniquely predicts memory for large-scale space. Memory & Cognition, 47(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0860-2
Schwan, S., & Ildirar, S. (2010). Watching film for the first time: How adult viewers interpret perceptual discontinuities in film. Psychological Science, 21(7), 970–976. https://doi.org/10.1777/0956797610372632
Shelton, A. L., & Mcnamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(1), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03210780
Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2004). Spatial memory and perspective taking. Memory & Cognition, 32(3), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195835
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science (New York, N.Y.), 171(3972), 701–703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 644–649. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208840
Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9(4), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00062
Smith, T. J. (2012). The attentional theory of cinematic continuity. Projections, 6(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2012.060102
Smith, T. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Edit Blindness: The relationship between attention and global change blindness in dynamic scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.2.2.6
Smith, T. J., Levin, D., & Cutting, J. E. (2012). A window on reality: Perceiving edited moving images. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412437407
Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
Tversky, B. (2004). Narratives of Space, Time, and Life. Mind and Language, 19(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00264.x
Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110(1), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.008
Wickham, H., (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. ISBN 978–3–319–24277–4. Retrieved June 13, 2022 from https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
Wolbers, T., & Hegarty, M. (2010). What determines our navigational abilities? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001
Yu, A. B., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Transformations and representations supporting spatial perspective taking. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 17(4), 304–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2017.1322596
Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273
Acknowledgements
We thank Melissa Elston, Steven Armstrong, Kacie Armstrong and Erin İşbilir for their help in stimulus creation and James Eric Cutting for their shared comments and ideas.
Funding
This work was supported within the scope of the scientific research project which was accepted by the Project Evaluation Commission of Yaşar University under the project number and title of “BAP107_ Spatial Perspective Taking in Dynamic Visual Scenes”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ACŞ developed the study concept and the study design. TA and ZGO programmed the experiment. Data collection, data analysis, drafting the manuscript, and providing critical revisions for drafts were combined work of three authors. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Ethics approval was granted by the University Ethics Committee of the corresponding author.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Şimşek, A.C., Aydın, T. & Ozkan, Z.G. One perspective or two? Viewpoint dependency in visual events. Curr Psychol 43, 8624–8635 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04997-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04997-0