Abstract
Although job creation has received considerable attention, an economy’s ability to produce high-quality jobs providing decent work is also crucial. A job with a fair wage, safe working conditions, equal opportunities and treatment, social protection for employees and their families, personal development, social integration opportunities, and the freedom to express opinions and concerns at work are all examples of decent work. Our study examines empirical quantitative decent work studies that used an individual-level lens and identifies the indicators and outcomes of decent work tested in these studies. We used the Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases to identify empirical research articles that included and measured decent work in their research model. A total of 48 studies that had been published till the end of 2021 have been systematically reviewed. Our study provides an integrated framework that displays the antecedents and outcomes of decent work including mediators and moderators that have been tested. Also, we categorize the theories, methods, and contexts of the reviewed studies. We identify the possible gaps and potential research directions. We found marginalization and economic constraints are among the most studied antecedents of decent work. Survival needs satisfaction, and job and life satisfaction are among the important outcomes of decent work. The majority of individual-level decent work studies have relied on the Psychology of Working Theory as their framework. Future studies may expand this framework and discuss decent work from the perspective of other theories such as the Theories of Justice, Job Characteristics Model or the Two Factor Theory. The findings can be helpful to further research in decent work as well as help managers understand this important concept.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study. DOI number of reviewed studies provided in references. Selection criteria are provided in the methodology section.
References
Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., & Alabduljader, N. (2023). Best-practice recommendations for producers, evaluators, and users of methodological literature reviews. Organizational research methods, 26(1), 46–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120943281
Allan, B. A., Tebbe, E. A., Bouchard, L. M., & Duffy, R. D. (2019). Access to decent and meaningful work in a sexual Minority Population. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(3), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072718758064
Allan, B. A., Autin, K. L., Duffy, R. D., & Sterling, H. M. (2020). Decent and meaningful work: A longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(6), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000432
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Atitsogbe, K. A., Kossi, E. Y., Pari, P., & Rossier, J. (2021). Decent work in Sub-Saharan Africa: An application of psychology of working theory in a sample of togolese primary school teachers. Journal of Career Assessment, 29(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072720928255
Autin, K. L., Duffy, R. D., Blustein, D. L., Gensmer, N. P., Douglass, R. P., England, J. W., & Allan, B. A. (2019). The development and initial validation of need satisfaction scales within the psychology of working theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000323.supp
Autin, K. L., Shelton, A. J., Diaz Tapia, W. A., Garcia, R. G., & Cadenas, G. A. (2021). Testing psychology of working theory among spanish-speaking Latinx workers in the U.S. Journal of Career Assessment, 29(3), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072720976620
Autin, K. L., Williams, T. R., Allan, B. A., & Herdt, M. E. (2021b). Decent work among people of color: The moderating role of critical consciousness. Journal of Career Assessment, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727211039811
Blustein, D. L., Olle, C., Connors-kellgren, A., & Diamonti, A. J. (2016). Decent Work: A Psychological Perspective. 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00407
Blustein, D. L., Duffy, R., Ferreira, J. A., Cohen-Scali, V., Cinamon, R. G., & Allan, B. A. (2020). Unemployment in the time of COVID-19: A research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020a.103436
Blustein, D. L., Perera, H. N., Diamonti, A. J., Gutowski, E., Meerkins, T., Davila, A., Erby, W., & Konowitz, L. (2020). The uncertain state of work in the U.S.: Profiles of decent work and precarious work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 122, 103481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020b.103481
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
Buyukgoze-Kavas, A., & Autin, K. L. (2019). Decent work in Turkey: Context, conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.01.006
Chen, S. C., Jiang, W., & Ma, Y. (2020). Decent work in a transition economy: An empirical study of employees in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153(April 2020), 119947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119947
Çolakoğlu, C., & Toygar, A. (2021). The psychological effect of compensation on decent work dimensions: A research on public and private school teachers in Turkey. International Journal of Social Economics, 48(8), 1191–1212. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-04-2020-0236
Deranty, J., & MacMillan, C. (2012). The ILO’s decent work initiative: Suggestions for an extension of the notion of “decent work. Journal of Social Philosophy, 43(4), 386.
Di Fabio, A., & Kenny, M. E. (2019). Decent work in Italy: Context, conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110(Part A, February 2019), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.014
Di Fabio, A., Svicher, A., & Gori, A. (2021). Occupational fatigue: Relationship with personality traits and decent work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742809
Dodd, V., Hooley, T., & Burke, C. (2019). Decent work in the UK: Context, conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.04.002
Douglass, R. P., Velez, B. L., Conlin, S. E., Duffy, R. D., & England, J. W. (2017). Examining the psychology of working theory: Decent work among sexual minorities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(5), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000212
Douglass, R. P., Autin, K. L., Buyukgoze-Kavas, A., & Gensmer, N. P. (2020). Proactive personality and decent work among racially and ethnically diverse working adults. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(3), 512–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719894571
Duffy, R. D., Blustein, D. L., Diemer, M. A., & Autin, K. L. (2016). The psychology of working theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000140
Duffy, R. D., Allan, B. A., England, J. W., Blustein, D. L., Autin, K. L., Douglass, R. P., Ferreira, J., & Santos, E. J. R. (2017). The development and initial validation of the decent work scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000191
Duffy, R. D., Velez, B. L., England, J. W., Autin, K. L., Douglass, R. P., Allan, B. A., & Blustein, D. L. (2018). An examination of the psychology of working theory with racially and ethnically diverse employed adults. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(3), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000247
Duffy, R. D., Gensmer, N., Allan, B. A., Kim, H. J., Douglass, R. P., England, J. W., Autin, K. L., & Blustein, D. L. (2019). Developing, validating, and testing improved measures within the psychology of working theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019a.02.012
Duffy, R. D., Kim, H. J., Gensmer, N. P., Raque-Bogdan, T. L., Douglass, R. P., England, J. W., & Buyukgoze-Kavas, A. (2019). Linking decent work with physical and mental health: A psychology of working perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019b.05.002
Duffy, R. D., Kim, H. J., Allan, B. A., & Prieto, C. G. (2020). Predictors of decent work across time: Testing propositions from psychology of working theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 123, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103507
Duffy, R. D., Prieto, C. G., Kim, H. J., Raque-Bogdan, T. L., & Duffy, N. O. (2021). Decent work and physical health: A multi-wave investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127, 103544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103544
Duffy, R. D., Kim, H. J., Perez, G., Prieto, C., Torgal, C., & Kenny, M. (2022). Decent education as a precursor to decent work: An overview and construct conceptualization. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 138, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103771
England, J. W., Duffy, R. D., Gensmer, N. P., Kim, H. J., Buyukgoze-Kavas, A., & Larson-Konar, D. M. (2020). Women attaining decent work: The important role of workplace climate in psychology of Working Theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000411
Ferraro, T., Pais, L., Rebelo Dos Santos, N., & Moreira, J. M. (2018). The decent work questionnaire: Development and validation in two samples of knowledge workers. International Labour Review, 157(2), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12039
Ferraro, T., dos Santos, N. R., Pais, L., Zappalà, S., & Moreira, J. M. (2021). The decent work questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the italian version. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 29(2), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12328
Ferreira, J. A., Haase, R. F., Santos, E. R., Rabaça, J. A., Figueiredo, L., Hemami, H. G., & Almeida, L. M. (2019). Decent work in Portugal: Context, conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.01.009
García-Rodríguez, F. J., Armas-Cruz, Y., & González-de-la-Rosa, M. (2021). Decent work in hospitality: Scale development and validation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(10), 1674–1693. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1865386
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees (65 vol.). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review.
Hiebl, M. R. W. (2023). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of Management Research. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120986851
Hosoda, M., Nguyen, L. T., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (2012). The effect of hispanic accents on employment decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(4), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941211220162
Huang, W., Shen, J., & Yuan, C. (2021). How decent work affects affective commitment among chinese employees: The roles of psychological safety and labor relations climate. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(1), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727211029673
Huang, W., Shen, J., Yuan, C., & Li, M. (2021). Roles of gender and basic need satisfaction in decent work perception and voice behavior. Employee Relations, 43(1), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2020-0107
Huston, A. C., & Bentley, A. C. (2010). Human development in societal context. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100442
ILO. (1999). Decent work. Report of the Director-General, International Labour Conference, 87th Session. Geneva. https://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc87/rep-i.htm
Işık, E., Kozan, S., & Işık, A. N. (2019). Cross-cultural validation of the turkish version of the decent work scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(3), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072718763636
Jobbehdar Nourafkan, N., Tanova, C., & Gokmenoglu, K. K. (2022). Can Mindfulness improve Organizational Citizenship and innovative behaviors through its impact on Well-Being among Academics? Psychological Reports, 0(0), 003329412110695. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211069517
Kashyap, V., & Arora, R. (2020). Decent work and work–family enrichment: Role of meaning at work and work engagement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(1), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2020-0133
Kashyap, V., Nakra, N., & Arora, R. (2021). Do “decent work” dimensions lead to work engagement? Empirical evidence from higher education institutions in India. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1/2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-08-2020-0127
Khatri, P., & Duggal, H. K. (2022). Well-being of higher education consumers: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(5), 1564–1593. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12783
Khaw, K. W., Alnoor, A., Al-Abrrow, H., Tiberius, V., Ganesan, Y., & Atshan, N. A. (2022). Reactions towards organizational change: A systematic literature review. Current Psychology, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03070-6
Khilji, S. E., & Wang, X. (2006). Intended’and ‘implemented’HRM: The missing linchpin in strategic human resource management research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(7), 1171–1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190600756384
Kim, H. J., Duffy, R. D., Lee, S., Lee, J., & Lee, K. H. (2019). Application of the psychology of working theory with korean emerging adults. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(6), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000368
Kim, H. J., Kim, S. Y., Duffy, R. D., Nguyen, N. P., & Wang, D. (2020). A cross-cultural comparison of psychology of working theory among U.S. and Korean college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(5), 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000408
Kim, N., Kim, H. J., & Lee, K. H. (2020). Social status and decent work: Test of a moderated mediation model. Career Development Quarterly, 68(3), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12232
Kim, H. J., Duffy, R. D., & Allan, B. A. (2021). Profiles of decent work: General trends and group differences. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000434
Kozan, S., Işik, E., & Blustein, D. L. (2019). Decent work and well-being among low-income turkish employees: Testing the psychology of working theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(3), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000342
Lee, Y., Song, J. H., & Kim, S. J. (2021). Validation study of the Korean version of decent work scale. European Journal of Training and Development, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-03-2021-0040
Li, J. (2020). Join the fight against poverty: Utilizing HRD practices to support pathways to sustainable employment and decent work. Human Resource Development International, 23(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1701222
Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., Verma, S., & Chaturvedi, R. (2022). Alexa, what do we know about conversational commerce? Insights from a systematic literature review. Psychology & Marketing, 39(6), 1129–1155. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21654
Ma, Y., Huang, G., & Autin, K. L. (2021). Linking decent work with academic engagement and satisfaction among first-generation college students: A psychology of working perspective. Journal of Career Assessment, 29(1), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072720943153
Masdonati, J., Schreiber, M., Marcionetti, J., & Rossier, J. (2019). Decent work in Switzerland: Context, conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.004
McIlveen, P., Hoare, P. N., Perera, H. N., Kossen, C., Mason, L., Munday, S., Alchin, C., Creed, A., & McDonald, N. (2021). Decent work’s association with job satisfaction, work engagement, and withdrawal intentions in australian working adults. Journal of Career Assessment, 29(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072720922959
Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150303
Paul, J., & Benito, G. R. (2018). A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: What do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? Asia Pacific Business Review, 24(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2017.1357316
Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
Paul, J., Parthasarathy, S., & Gupta, P. (2017). Exporting challenges of SMEs: A review and future research agenda. Journal of World Business, 52(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.01.003
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4‐SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1–O16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695
Pereira, S., Dos Santos, N., & Pais, L. (2019). Empirical research on decent work: A Literature Review. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53
Rehman, Z. U., Baharun, R., & Salleh, N. Z. M. (2020). Antecedents, consequences, and reducers of perceived risk in social media: A systematic literature review and directions for further research. Psychology & Marketing, 37(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21281
Ribeiro, M. A., Teixeira, M. A. P., & Ambiel, R. A. M. (2019). Decent work in Brazil: Context, conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.03.006
Rossier, J., & Ouedraogo, A. (2021). Work volition, decent work, and work fulfilment, in the formal and informal economy in Burkina Faso. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 49(2), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1879991
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
Ryan, R. M., Donald, J. N., & Bradshaw, E. L. (2021). Mindfulness and motivation: A process view using self-determination theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 300–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211009511
Sehnbruch, K., Burchell, B., Agloni, N., & Piasna, A. (2015). Human development and decent work: Why some concepts succeed and others fail to make an impact. Development and Change, 46(2), 197–224.
Sheng, X., & Zhou, H. (2021). The effect of decent work on voice behavior: The mediating role of thriving at work and the moderating role of proactive personality. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01173-6
Smith, R. W., Baranik, L. E., & Duffy, R. D. (2020). Psychological ownership within psychology of working theory: A three-wave study of gender and sexual minority employees. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103374
Tokar, D. M., & Kaut, K. P. (2018). Predictors of decent work among workers with Chiari malformation: An empirical test of the psychology of working theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106(2018), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.01.002
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
United Nations (2021). The sustainable development goals report. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/
Vignoli, E., Prudhomme, N., Terriot, K., Cohen-Scali, V., Arnoux-Nicolas, C., Bernaud, J. L., & Lallemand, N. (2020). Decent work in France: Context, conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103345
Vilhjálmsdóttir, G. (2021). Young workers without formal qualifications: Experience of work and connections to career adaptability and decent work. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 49(2), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1885011
Wan, W., & Duffy, R. D. (2022). Decent work and turnover intention among New Generation Employees: The mediating role of job satisfaction and the moderating role of Job Autonomy. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221094591
Wang, D., Jia, Y., Hou, Z., Xu, H., Zhang, H., & Guo, X. (2019). A test of psychology of working theory among chinese urban workers: Examining predictors and outcomes of decent work ☆. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115(15), 103325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103325
Wei, J., Chan, S. H. J., & Autin, K. (2021). Assessing perceived future decent work securement among chinese impoverished college students. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727211005653
Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2007). Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. CAHRS Working Paper #07–03, 1–24. Retrieved from https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/77351
Zacher, H. (2016). Within-person relationships between daily individual and job characteristics and daily manifestations of career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with ethical standards
This systematic literature review study reviews the findings of published articles accessible from “Science Direct”, “Scopus” and “Web of Science” and does not involve new human and/or animal participants.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nourafkan, N.J., Tanova, C. Employee perceptions of decent work: a systematic literature review of quantitative studies. Curr Psychol 42, 29772–29800 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04837-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04837-1