Abstract
Guilty pleasures are an underexplored concept within psychology, with research typically exploring singular activities instead of the phenomenon itself. The current study expands upon past research through defining guilty pleasures as active dissonance, distinct from regret and resolution, as well as taking a broader scope to explore guilty pleasure across three distinct activities: gambling, shoplifting and consuming pornography. Thematic analysis of online comments explores commenters constructions of activities as guilty pleasures with three themes identified. (a) Consequences, where commenters perceived activities as having adverse outcomes to themselves and/or others, (b) Conflict with values, where commenters assessed the activity as hypocritical to their own actions and values and/or deviant from societal norms or values instilled in them by others, and (c) Justification, which preserves the activity through initial gratification and commenters subsequently rationalising and/or mitigating the impact of their behaviour. Concluding remarks advocate for further research into the concept of guilty pleasures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaya, A., Bach, R., Keusch, F., & Kreuter, F. (2021). New Data sources in Social Science Research: Things to know before Working with Reddit Data. Social Science Computer Review, 39(5), 943–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319893305.
Barnes, N., Penn-Edwards, S., & Sim, C. (2015). A dialogic about using Facebook status updates for education research: A PhD student’s journey. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1024429.
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 243–267.
Bellemare, C., Sebald, A., & Suetens, S. (2019). Guilt aversion in economics and psychology. Journal of Economic Psychology, 73, 52–59.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Brinkmann, S. (2010). Guilt in a Fluid Culture? A View from Positioning Theory. Culture & Psychology, 16(2), 253–266.
Brooksbank, R., & Fullerton, S. (2020). Cognitive dissonance revisited. Asia Pacific journal of marketing and logistics, 32(8), 1759–1782.
Burger, A. M., Schuler, J., & Eberling, E. (2022). Guilty pleasures: Moral licensing in climate-related behavior. Global Environmental Change, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102415.
Cancino-Montecinos, S., Björklund, F., & Lindholm, T. (2018). Dissonance and abstraction: Cognitive conflict leads to higher level of construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2287.
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613.
Cooper-Samonini, E., Delaney, Z., & Bowden-Jones, H. (2021). Gambling disorder and NHS treatment: An overview. Trends in Urology & Men’s Health, 12(6), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/tre.826.
Elder, R. S., & Mohr, G. S. (2020). Guilty displeasures: How imagined guilt dampens consumer enjoyment. Appetite, 150, 104641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104641.
Essig, T. (2012). The addiction concept and technology: Diagnosis, metaphor, or something else? A psychodynamic point of view. Journal of clinical psychology, 68(11), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21917.
Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive dissonance. Scientific American, 207(4), 93–106.
Ghorbani, M., Liao, Y., Çayköylü, S., & Chand, M. (2013). Guilt, shame, and reparative behavior: The Effect of Psychological Proximity. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 311–323.
Goffin, K., & Cova, F. (2019). An empirical investigation of guilty pleasures. Philosophical psychology, 32(7), 1129–1155.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of Spoiled Identity. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Grubbs, J. B., Perry, S. L., Wilt, J. A., & Reid, R. C. (2019). Pornography problems due to Moral Incongruence: An integrative model with a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Archives of sexual behavior, 48(2), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1248-x.
Henderson, M., Johnson, N. F., & Auld, G. (2013). Silences of ethical practice: Dilemmas for researchers using social media. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(6), 546–560.
Hennell, K., Limmer, M., & Piacentini, M. (2020). Ethical dilemmas using social media in qualitative Social Research: A Case Study of Online Participant Observation. Sociological Research Online, 25(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780419888933.
Howell, A. J., Turowski, J. B., & Buro, K. (2012). Guilt, empathy, and apology. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 917–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.021.
Hutchinson, P. (2020). The “placebo” paradox and the emotion paradox: Challenges to psychological explanation. Theory and Psychology, 30(5), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320928139.
Jankowski, K. F., & Takahashi, H. (2014). Cognitive neuroscience of social emotions and implications for psychopathology: Examining embarrassment, guilt, envy, and schadenfreude. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 68(5), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12182.
Korgaonkar, P. K., Gironda, J. T., Petrescu, M., Krishen, A. S., & Mangleburg, T. F. (2020). Preventing shoplifting: Exploring online comments to propose a model. Psychology & Marketing, 37(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21290.
Lynch, M., Knezevic, I., & Ryan, K. L. (2021). Opportunities for qualitative analysis of Social Media Platforms in Dietetic Research and Practice. Canadian journal of dietetic practice and research: a publication of Dietitians of Canada = Revue canadienne de la pratique et de la recherche en dietetique : une publication des Dietetistes du Canada, 82(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2020-035.
Markides, B. R., Laws, R., Hesketh, K., Maddison, R., Denney-Wilson, E., & Campbell, K. J. (2022). A thematic cluster analysis of parents’ online discussions about fussy eating. Maternal & child nutrition, 18(2), e13316. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13316.
Maxwell, D., Robinson, S. R., Williams, J. R., & Keaton, C. (2020). A short story of a lonely Guy”: A qualitative thematic analysis of Involuntary Celibacy using reddit. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(6), 1852–1874.
Miao, L. (2011). Guilty pleasure or pleasurable guilt? Affective experience of impulse buying in hedonic-driven consumption. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 35(1), 79–101.
Mossière, A. M., Olver, M., & Marche, T. (2020). Psychopathy, emotionality, and offending. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 31(4), 520–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2020.1772341.
Ozuem, W., Willis, M., & Howell, K. (2022). Thematic analysis without paradox: Sensemaking and context. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 25(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-07-2021-0092.
Pinkus, E., Moore, S. A., Taplin, R., & Pearce, J. (2016). Re-thinking visitor loyalty at ‘once in a lifetime’ nature-based tourism destinations: Empirical evidence from Purnululu National Park, Australia. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 16, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2016.08.002.
Rivera, M. A., & Croes, R. (2010). Ecotourists’ loyalty: Will they tell about the destination or will they return? Journal of Ecotourism, 9(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724040902795964.
Ross, I. (2019). A guilty pleasure? The indian museum as a popular backdrop for selfies. Museum Management and Curatorship, 34(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2019.1596827.
Rustichini, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2014). Moral hypocrisy, power and social preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization: Part A, 107(Part A), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.08.002.
Sezer, O., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2015). Ethical blind spots: Explaining unintentional unethical behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.030.
Shields, A. N., Taylor, E., & Welch, J. R. (2022). Understanding the conversation around COVID-19 and eating disorders: A thematic analysis of reddit. Journal of eating disorders, 10(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00530-z.
Stevens, G., O’Donnell, V. L., & Williams, L. (2015). Public domain or private data? Developing an ethical approach to social media research in an inter-disciplinary project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1024010.
Tignor, S. M., & Colvin, C. R. (2017). The interpersonal adaptiveness of dispositional guilt and shame: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Journal of personality, 85(3), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12244.
Tignor, S. M., & Colvin, C. R. (2019). The meaning of guilt: Reconciling the past to inform the future. Journal of personality and social psychology, 116(6), 989–1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000216.
Vinski, E. J., & Tryon, G. S. (2009). Study of a cognitive dissonance intervention to address High School Students’ cheating attitudes and behaviors. Ethics & Behavior, 19(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420902886692.
Xiao, W., Wu, Q., Yang, Q., Zhou, L., Jiang, Y., Zhang, J., Miao, D., & Peng, J. (2015). Moral hypocrisy on the basis of construal level: To be a utilitarian personal decision maker or to be a moral advisor? PloS one, 10(2), e0117540. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117540.
Zhao, M. (2020). Guilt without Perceived Wrongdoing.(Report). Philosophy & Public Affairs, 48(3), 285.
Ziegler, J. A., Silberg, J. N., Araujo, G., Labaja, J., Ponzo, A., Rollins, R., & Dearden, P. (2018). A guilty pleasure: Tourist perspectives on the ethics of feeding whale sharks in Oslob, Philippines. Tourism Management, 68, 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.04.001.
World Health Organization (2022). ICD-11: International classification of diseases (11th revision). https://icd.who.int/
Acknowledgements
The researcher would like to thank Dr Phil Hutchinson for their guidance as dissertation supervisor throughout the research process.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Declarations
No funds, grants, or other support was received for conducting this study, additionally the authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Ethical approval was granted by Manchester Metropolitan University’s review board and the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sealey, J. What consistent themes inform individual’s constructions of activities as guilty pleasures? A thematic analysis of gambling, shoplifting and consuming pornography. Curr Psychol 43, 5975–5986 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04794-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04794-9