Abstract
Visual face pareidolia is the experience of perceiving illusory faces in inanimate objects (e.g., rocks, buildings, appliances); however, the individual differences that relate to these pareidolia experiences remain unclear. The present set of studies assessed individual differences in face pareidolia, with a particular emphasis on personality factors previously associated with changes in perceptual experiences (openness and absorption). Study 1 measured face pareidolia in two novel ways: an implicit, speeded visual categorization task, and a self-report measure. Study 2 measured face pareidolia using more explicit categorization tasks and a slightly modified version of the self-report measure from Study 1. Across both studies, we also measured the Big Five personality dimensions, absorption, and a performance-based measure of divergent association formation, a proxy for creativity. We found that absorption was positively associated with individual differences in face pareidolia. The association between absorption and face pareidolia remained significant when controlling for factors that also positively correlated with absorption (openness, extraversion, and positive mood). Taken together, these results suggest that individual differences in face pareidolia experiences are consistently associated with absorption, which represents an especially promising construct to investigate in future pareidolia research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data and materials associated with this manuscript are available on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/akh7g/).
References
Abo Hamza, E. G., Kéri, S., Csigó, K., Bedewy, D., & Moustafa, A. A. (2021). Pareidolia in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 746734. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.746734
Aleman, A., Böcker, K. B. E., Hijman, R., de Haan, E. H. F., & Kahn, R. S. (2003). Cognitive basis of hallucinations in schizophrenia: Role of top-down information processing. Schizophrenia Research, 64(2–3), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00060-4
Algom, D., & Fitousi, D. (2016). Half a century of research on Garner interference and the separability–integrality distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 142(12), 1352–1383. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000072
Antinori, A., Carter, O. L., & Smillie, L. D. (2017). Seeing it both ways: Openness to experience and binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.03.005
Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Shiffman, S., Lerner, N., & Salovey, P. (2006). Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: A comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 780–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.780
Bridges, D., Pitiot, A., MacAskill, M. R., & Peirce, J. W. (2020). The timing mega-study: Comparing a range of experiment generators, both lab-based and online. PeerJ, 8, e9414. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9414
Brown, R. J. (2004). Psychological mechanisms of medically unexplained symptoms: An integrative conceptual model. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.793
Crawford, H. J. (1982). Hypnotizability, daydreaming styles, imagery vividness, and absorption: A multidimensional study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(5), 915–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.5.915
Crump, M. J. C., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s mechanical Turk as a Tool for experimental behavioral research. Plos One, 8(3), e57410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410
Curby, K. M., & Gauthier, I. (2007). A visual short-term memory advantage for faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 620–628. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196811
de Boer, J. N., Linszen, M. M. J., de Vries, J., Schutte, M. J. L., Begemann, M. J. H., Heringa, S. M., Bohlken, M. M., Hugdahl, K., Aleman, A., Wijnen, F. N. K., & Sommer, I. E. C. (2019). Auditory hallucinations, top-down processing and language perception: A general population study. Psychological Medicine, 49(16), 2772–2780. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171800380X
de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
Diana, L., Frei, M., Chesham, A., de Jong, D., Chiffi, K., Nyffeler, T., Bassetti, C. L., Goebel, N., Eberhard-Moscicka, A. K., & Müri, R. M. (2021). A divergent approach to pareidolias—exploring creativity in a novel way. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 15(2), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000293
Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2007). Attentional capture by task-irrelevant fearful faces is revealed by the N2pc component. Biological Psychology, 74(1), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.008
Epihova, G., Cook, R., & Andrews, T. J. (2022). Recognition of pareidolic objects in developmental prosopagnosic and neurotypical individuals. Cortex; A Journal Devoted To The Study Of The Nervous System And Behavior, 153, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.04.011
Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is “special” about face perception? Psychological Review, 105(3), 482–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.482
Frassle, S., Sommer, J., Jansen, A., Naber, M., & Einhauser, W. (2014). Binocular rivalry: Frontal activity relates to Introspection and Action but not to Perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(5), 1738–1747. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4403-13.2014
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform “face area” increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(6), 568–573. https://doi.org/10.1038/9224
Glisky, M. L., Tataryn, D. J., Tobias, B. A., Kihlstrom, J. F., & McConkey, K. M. (1991). Absorption, openness to experience, and hypnotizability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.263
Gluckman, M., & Johnson, S. P. (2013). Attentional capture by social stimuli in young infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00527
Göbel, N., Möller, J. C., Hollenstein, N., Binder, A., Oechsner, M., Ide, J., Urwyler, P., Cazzoli, D., & Müri, R. M. (2021). Face Perception and Pareidolia production in patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 669691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.669691
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
Grill-Spector, K., Weiner, K. S., Kay, K., & Gomez, J. (2017). The functional neuroanatomy of Human Face Perception. Annual Review of Vision Science, 3(1), 167–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061214
Hall, J. M., O’Callaghan, C., Muller, A. J., Ehgoetz Martens, K. A., Phillips, J. R., Moustafa, A. A., Lewis, S. J. G., & Shine, J. M. (2019). Changes in structural network topology correlate with severity of hallucinatory behavior in Parkinson’s disease. Network Neuroscience, 3(2), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00078
Hauser, D., Moss, A. J., Rosenzweig, C., Jaffe, S. N., Robinson, J., & Litman, L. (2021). Evaluating CloudResearch’s Approved Group as a Solution for Problematic Data Quality on MTurk [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/48yxj
Hee Kim, K. (2006). Is Creativity Unidimensional or Multidimensional? Analyses of the Torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_2
Horowitz, E. J. (2018). Facial Information as a Minimal Cue of Animacy [Dissertation, University of California Santa Barbara]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31d7g4x2
Hugdahl, K. (2009). Hearing voices”: Auditory hallucinations as failure of top-down control of bottom-up perceptual processes. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(6), 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00775.x
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302–4311. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997
Kato, M., & Mugitani, R. (2015). Pareidolia in infants. PLOS ONE, 10(2), e0118539. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118539
Kaufman, J. C., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2019). A review of Creativity Theories: What questions are we trying to answer? In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed., pp. 27–43). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.004
Kihlstrom, J. F., Register, P. A., Hoyt, I. P., Albright, J. S., Grigorian, E. M., Heindel, W. C., & Morrison, C. R. (1989). Dispositional correlates of hypnosis: A phenomenological approach. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37(3), 249–263.
Kirmayer, L. J., Robbins, J. M., & Paris, J. (1994). Somatoform disorders: Personality and the social matrix of somatic distress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.125
Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391
Leadner, K., Arabian, S., & Gabay, S. (2021). The involvement of monocular channels in the face pareidolia effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02027-3
Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection Theory (0 ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611147
Manmiller, J. L., Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (2005). Hypnotizability, Creative Capacity, Creativity Styles, absorption, and phenomenological experience during hypnosis. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_2
Mavrogiorgou, P., Peitzmeier, N., Enzi, B., Flasbeck, V., & Juckel, G. (2021). Pareidolias and Creativity in patients with Mental Disorders. Psychopathology, 54(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1159/000512129
McCrae, R. R. (1993). Openness to experience as a basic dimension of personality. Imagination Cognition and Personality, 13(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.2190/H8H6-QYKR-KEU8-GAQ0
Milling, L. S., Kirsch, I., & Burgess, C. (2000). Hypnotic suggestibility and absorption: Revisiting the context effect. Contemporary Hypnosis, 17(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.190
Olson, J. A., Nahas, J., Chmoulevitch, D., Cropper, S. J., & Webb, M. E. (2021). Naming unrelated words predicts creativity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(25), e2022340118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022340118
Pekala, R. J., Wenger, C. F., & Levine, R. L. (1985). Individual differences in phenomenological experience: States of consciousness as a function of absorption. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.125
Pretz, J. E., & McCollum, V. A. (2014). Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 8(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035597
Proverbio, A. M., & Galli, J. (2016). Women are better at seeing faces where there are none: An ERP study of face pareidolia. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(9), 1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw064
Robertson, D. J., Jenkins, R., & Burton, A. M. (2017). Face detection dissociates from face identification. Visual Cognition, 25(7–8), 740–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2017.1327465
Robinson, J., Rosenzweig, C., Moss, A. J., & Litman, L. (2019). Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the mechanical Turk participant pool. PLOS ONE, 14(12), e0226394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226394
Sato, S., & Kawahara, J. I. (2015). Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79(4), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0599-8
Tan, C., Lau, X., Kung, Y., & Kailsan, R. A. (2019). Openness to experience enhances Creativity: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation and the creative process Engagement. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.170
Taubert, J., Wardle, S. G., Flessert, M., Leopold, D. A., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2017). Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey. Current Biology, 27(16), 2505–2509e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.075
Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the multidimensional personality questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 8, 1031–1010.
Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036681
Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L., & Imai, K. (2014). Mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5), https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i05
Uchiyama, M., Nishio, Y., Yokoi, K., Hosokai, Y., Takeda, A., & Mori, E. (2015). Pareidolia in Parkinson’s disease without dementia: A positron emission tomography study. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 21(6), 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.03.020
Vickers, A. J. (2004). Statistical considerations for use of composite health-related quality-of-life scores in randomized trials. Quality of Life Research, 13(4), 717–723. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000021686.47079.0d
Wardle, S. G., Taubert, J., Teichmann, L., & Baker, C. I. (2020). Rapid and dynamic processing of face pareidolia in the human brain. Nature Communications, 11(1), 4518. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18325-8
Wardle, S. G., Paranjape, S., Taubert, J., & Baker, C. I. (2022). Illusory faces are more likely to be perceived as male than female. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(5), e2117413119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117413119
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Witthöft, M., Rist, F., & Bailer, J. (2008). Evidence for a specific link between the personality trait of absorption and Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part A, 71(11–12), 795–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390801985687
Yokoi, K., Nishio, Y., Uchiyama, M., Shimomura, T., Iizuka, O., & Mori, E. (2014). Hallucinators find meaning in noises: Pareidolic illusions in dementia with Lewy bodies. Neuropsychologia, 56, 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.017
Zhou, L. F., & Meng, M. (2020). Do you see the “face”? Individual differences in face pareidolia. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 14, e2. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.27
Funding
This project was funded by an internal grant to SVH from Huron University College at Western.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This study was designed by Stephen Van Hedger and Kathryne Van Hedger. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Katherine Hull, data analyses were performed by Stephen Van Hedger. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Katherine Hull and all authors contributed to editing and revising the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at Huron University College at Western.
Consent to Participate
All participants provided informed consent and were treated in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hull, K., Van Hedger, K. & Van Hedger, S.C. Absorption relates to individual differences in visual face pareidolia. Curr Psychol 43, 4458–4474 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04670-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04670-6