Abstract
Knowledge sabotage is alarmingly widespread in the workplace, resulting in detrimental consequences for the victim, organization, and other stakeholders. However, there is a dearth of empirical research on this phenomenon’s predisposing and inhibiting factors. Against this backdrop, the current study developed and tested a model in which dispositional greed and cutting corners at work were considered predisposing factors. At the same time, ethical leadership was regarded as an inhibitor. Data were collected in three waves, with a time lag of three weeks intervals, from 322 full-time employees in various organizations spanning different sectors in Nigeria. The measurement and structural models of the study were analyzed with partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results revealed that dispositional greed was positively related to cutting corners at work but not knowledge sabotage. Cutting corners at work and ethical leadership had positive and negative relationships with knowledge sabotage, respectively. Whereas cutting corners at work mediated the positive relationship between dispositional greed and knowledge sabotage, ethical leadership did not moderate the relationship between cutting corners at work and knowledge sabotage. Regarding implications of the findings, management can ensure that unnecessary bureaucratic bottlenecks that drastically slowdown work processes and stringent deadlines that make employees want to take shortcuts to save time are reduced if not completely eradicated. Organizations should also devise specific strategies to ensure that leaders adopt ethical leadership by, for example, making ethical leadership the reference criterion for selecting and evaluating leaders’ performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because permission was not obtained from participants to share their data publicly but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abbas, M., Raja, U., Darr, W., & Bouckenooghe, D. (2014). Combined effects of perceived politics and psychological capital on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance. Journal of Management, 40(7), 1813–1830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455243
Abdullah, M. I., Dechun, H., Ali, M., & Usman, M. (2019). Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: a moderated mediation model of relational social capital, and instrumental thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2403. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02403
Agarwal, U. A., Gupta, M., & Cooke, F. L. (2022). Knowledge hide and seek: role of ethical leadership, self-enhancement and job-involvement. Journal of Business Research, 141, 770–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.074
Anser, M. K., Ali, M., Usman, M., Rana, M. L. T., & Yousaf, Z. (2021). Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: an intervening and interactional analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 41(5–6), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1739657
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Beck, J. W., Scholer, A. A., & Schmidt, A. M. (2017). Workload, risks, and goal framing as antecedents of shortcut behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9450-0
Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: a qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105278021
Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2625-1
Boddy, C. R. (2011). The corporate psychopaths theory of the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0810-4
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: a review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: a social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
Brummer, A. (2014). Bad banks: Greed, incompetence and the next global crisis. Penguin Random House.
Burke, R. J. (2009). Greed. In R. J. Burke, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Research companion to corruption in organizations (pp. 33–59). Edward Elgar.
Casimir, G., Lee, K., & Loon, M. (2012). Knowledge sharing: influences of trust, commitment and cost. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 740–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211262781
Cepeda-Carrion, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Cillo, V. (2019). Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0322
Chennamaneni, A., Teng, J. T. C., & Raja, M. K. (2012). A unified model of knowledge sharing behaviours: theoretical development and empirical test. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(11), 1097–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.624637
Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: a five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1281–1303. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28165855
Crusius, J., Thierhoff, J., & Lange, J. (2021). Dispositional greed predicts benign and malicious envy. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, Article 110361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110361
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., Hill, D., Wenner, C. J., & Jacobs, J. W. (2006). Consilience and Life History Theory: from genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26(2), 243–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.002
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research,18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2),139–151. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hannah, D. R., & Robertson, K. (2015). Why and how do employees break and bend confidential information protection rules? Journal of Management Studies, 52(3), 381–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12120
Haynes, K. T., Josefy, M., & Hitt, M. A. (2015). Tipping point: managers’ self-interest, greed, and altruism. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815585171
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (Advances in International Marketing) (Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). Bingley: Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variancebased structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Jonason, P. K., & O’Connor, P. J. (2017). Cutting corners at work: an individual differences perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.045
Jonason, P. K., Koenig, B. L., & Tost, J. (2010). Living a fast life: the Dark Triad and Life History Theory. Human Nature, 21(4), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-010-9102-4
Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (2016). The greed syndrome. INSEAD working paper series (No. 2016/26/EFE). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2766233
Lambie, G. W., & Haugen, J. S. (2019). Understanding greed as a unified construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.12.011
Li, X., Dang, J., Liu, L., Liang, Y., Wei, C., & Gu, C. (2021, January 29). Are greedy individuals more corrupt? Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01415-1
Marcus, D. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2015). A big tent of dark personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(8), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12185
Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0276
Men, C., Fong, P. S. W., Huo, W., Zhong, J., Jia, R., & Luo, J. (2020). Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: a moderated mediation model of psychological safety and mastery climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(3), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4027-7
Mussel, P., Reiter, A. M. F., Osinsky, R., & Hewig, J. (2015). State- and trait-greed, its impact on risky decisionmaking and underlying neural mechanisms. Social Neuroscience, 10(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.965340
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com
Sekhar, S., Uppal, N., & Shukla, A. (2020). Dispositional greed and its dark allies: an investigation among prospective managers. Personality and Individual Differences, 162, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110005. Article 110005.
Serenko, A. (2019). Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: conceptualization, typology, and empirical demonstration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7), 1260–1288. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2018-0007
Serenko, A. (2020). Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the perspective of the target. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(4), 737–773. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2019-0337
Serenko, A., & Choo, C. W. (2020). Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the role of narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and competitiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2299–2325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2020-0416
Seuntjens, T. G., Zeelenberg, M., Breugelmans, S. M., & van de Ven, N. (2015a). Defining greed. British Journal of Psychology, 106(3), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12100
Seuntjens, T. G., Zeelenberg, M., van de Ven, N., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2015b). Dispositional greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 917–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000031
Seuntjens, T. G., Zeelenberg, M., van de Ven, N., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2019). Greedy bastards: testing the relationship between wanting more and unethical behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.027
Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
Szabó, Z. P., Simon, E., Czibor, A., Restás, P., & Bereczkei, T. (2021). The importance of dark personality traits in predicting workplace outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 183, Article 111112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111112
Tanner, C., Linder, S., & Sohn, M. (2022). Does moral commitment predict resistance to corruption? Experimental evidence from a bribery game. Plos One, 17(1), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262201. Article e0262201.
van der Veen, W., Taxis, K., Wouters, H., Vermeulen, H., Bates, D. W., van den Bemt, P. M. L. A., & BCMA Study Group. (2020).Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(13–14),2239–2250. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15217
Wang, H., & Xie, X. (2021, July 02). The bright side of dispositional greed: Empathy for pain. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02049-z
Yeşiltaş, M., & Tuna, M. (2018). The effect of ethical leadership on service sabotage. The Service Industries Journal, 38(15–16), 1133–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2018.1433164
Yuan, Y., Yang, L., Cheng, X., & Wei, J. (2021). What is bullying hiding? Exploring antecedents and potential dimension of knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 1146–1169. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0256
Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2022). The good, bad and ugly of dispositional greed. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, Article 101323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101323
Zhao, H., & Xia, Q. (2019). Nurses’ negative affective states, moral disengagement, and knowledge hiding: the moderating role of ethical leadership. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(2), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12675
Zhao, H., Xia, Q., He, P., Sheard, G., & Wan, P. (2016). Workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding in service organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 59, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.09.009
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study.
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Enwereuzor, I.K. Dispositional greed and knowledge sabotage: the roles of cutting corners at work and ethical leadership. Curr Psychol 43, 1325–1339 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04361-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04361-2