Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What really matters? Comparing parents’ and adolescents’ perceptions of parental meta-emotion philosophy as predictors of adolescents’ positive mental health

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined parents’ versus adolescents’ reports of parental meta-emotion philosophy (PMEP) and compared the predictive power of parent-perceived versus adolescent-perceived PMEP on adolescents’ positive mental health (i.e., mental health, life satisfaction, and resilience). Two hundred and nineteen Chinese parent–adolescent dyads responded to our survey. Results indicated a significant parent–adolescent discrepancy in perceptions of emotion coaching (one dimension of PMEP). The parents showed more optimism about their coaching practices than did the adolescents, as seen in the significantly higher mean score in parents’ reports. In addition, adolescent-reported emotion coaching generally explained more variance in their mental health, life satisfaction, and resilience than parent-reported PMEP. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the role of PMEP in affecting adolescent positive mental health and highlight that adolescent-perceived PMEP is a critical factor when examining adolescents’ mental health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets analysed in the current study are available in https://osf.io/jszyt/?view_only=7136dd7a39aa462abe61908bcfe08d7a

References

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingming Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to declare.

Ethical statement

Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee in University of Macau (SSHRE21-APP082-FED). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants and their parents included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Zhou, M. & Zhang, X. What really matters? Comparing parents’ and adolescents’ perceptions of parental meta-emotion philosophy as predictors of adolescents’ positive mental health. Curr Psychol 43, 1190–1205 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04346-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04346-1

Keywords

Navigation