Abstract
High-functioning autism, informally known as Asperger’s, involves diminished social skills considered important for university instruction. In an experiment, 370 freshmen and sophomores mostly Caucasian students from a western U. S. university responded to a survey to investigate whether male or female instructors might equally benefit from higher initial student impressions of their teaching ability. Role Congruity Theory suggests that individuals will be supported when their characteristics align with their group’s social roles. The theory implies that women should follow female stereotypes involving more empathy and social skills and less systemization. Examples of social skills include smooth back-and-forth conversations, appropriate eye contact, and interest in students. An example of systemization includes having a specific order in how things are done in a classroom. In contrast, men should follow male stereotypes involving more systemization and less empathy and social skills. As autism is more associated with male characteristics, female university instructors who reveal their male-oriented high-functioning autism might receive lower initial impressions. In contrast, men who reveal their high-functioning autism would receive higher impressions. Results showed that student impressions of female instructors were not significantly different when autism was revealed (p < .26). In contrast, the results show that male instructors had higher student impressions if they reveal their autistic characteristics (p < .01). This research is unique in its focus on the relationship between instructor gender, autism revelations, and student impressions of the instructors. Implications for future research and practice are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abel, M. H. & Meltzer, A. L. (2007). Student ratings of a male and female professors’ lecture on sex discrimination in the workforce. Sex Roles, 57(3), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9245-x
Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114547952
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Association.
Bargiela, S., Steward, R., & Mandy, W. (2016). The experiences of late-diagnosed women with autism spectrum conditions: An investigation of the female autism phenotype. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(10), 3281–3294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2872-8
Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). Testing the extreme male brain (EMB) theory of autism: Let the data speak for themselves. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 10(1), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546800344000336
Baron-Cohen, S. (2020). The Pattern Seekers: How Autism Drives Human Invention. Basic Books.
Baron-Cohen S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 248–254. http://cogsci.bme.hu/~ivady/bscs/read/bc.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2021.
Barreto, M. (2014). Experiencing and coping with social stigma. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Dovidio, J. F., Simpson, J. A. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 2: Group Processes (pp. 473–506). American Psychological Association.
Barros, F., Figueiredo, C., Costa, A., & Soares, S. C. (2021). Sensory Processing in the Autism Spectrum: The Role of Attention to Detail and Somatic Trait Anxiety in the Olfactory Perception of the General Population. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 51, 2338–2353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04711-0
Basow, S. A., & Silberg, N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 308–314.
Bennett, S. K. (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 170.
Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.006
Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., & Stark, P. (2016). Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. Science Open Research. https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.v1. Accessed 2 Jan 2022.
Brosnan, M., & Gavin, J. (2021). The Impact of Stigma, Autism Label, and Wording on the Perceived Desirability of the Online Dating Profiles of Men on the Autism Spectrum. Journal of Autism Development Disorders, 51(11), 4077–4085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04830-8
Brosnan, M., & Mills, E. (2016). The effect of diagnostic labels on the affective responses of college students towards peers with ‘Asperger’s Syndrome’ and ‘Autism Spectrum Disorder.’ Autism, 20(4), 388–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315586721
Burns-Glover, A. L., & Veith, D. J. (1995). Revisiting gender and teaching evaluations: Sex still makes a difference. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(4), 69.
Carney, D., Colvin, R., & Hall, J. (2007). A thin-slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(5), 1054–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.01.004
Cassidy, S., Bradley, L., Shaw, R., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2018). Risk markers for suicidality in autistic adults. Molecular Autism, 9(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-018-0226-4
Cavanagh, G., & Fritzche, D. (1985). Using Vignettes in Business Ethics Research. In J. Post, L. Preston, & D. Collins (Eds.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 7 (pp. 279–293). JAI Press.
Clayson, D. E. (2013). Initial Impressions of the Student Evaluation of Teaching. The Journal of Education for Business, 88(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2011.633580
Colby, G., & Fowler, C. (2020). Data snapshot looks at full-time women faculty and faculty of color. Academe Blog. https://academeblog.org/2020/12/09/data-snapshot-looks-at-ful-time-women-faculty-and-faculty-of-color/. Accessed 2 Jan 2022.
Devine, J. G. (2003). Psychological autism, institutional autism, and economics. In E. Fullbrook (Ed.), The Crisis in Economics: The Post-Autistic Economics Movement: The First 600 Days. Rutledge.
Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In J. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19–35). Blackwell Publishing.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
Feldman, S., Ammar, W., Lo, K., Trepman, E., Zuylen, M. V., & Etzioni, O. (2019). Quantifying Sex Bias in Clinical Studies at Scale With Automated Data Extraction. JAMA Network Open, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6700
Freeman, H. R. (1994). Student evaluations of college instructors: Effects of type of course taught, instructor gender and gender role, and student gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 627–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.4.627
Freeman, D., Waite, F., Rosebrock, L., Petit, A., Causier, C., East, A., &. Lambe, S. (2020). We should beware of ignoring uncomfortable possible truths (a reply to McManus et al.). Psychological Medicine, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720002196
Fry, R., Kennedy, B., & Funk, C. (2021). STEM Jobs See Uneven progress in increasing gender, racial and ethnic diversity. Pew Research Center Report. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2021/03/PS_2021.04.01_diversity-in-STEM_REPORT.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2022.
Gourdine, R., Baffour, T., & Teasley, M. (2011). Autism and the African American Community. Social Work in Public Health, 26(4), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2011.579499
Greenberg, D. M., Warrier, V., Allison, C., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2018). Testing the empathizing-systemizing theory of sex differences and the Extreme Male Brain theory of autism in half a million people. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America., 115(48), 12152–12157. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811032115
Head, A. M., McGillivray, J. A. & Stokes, M. A. (2014). Gender differences in emotionality and sociability in children with autism spectrum disorders. Molecular Autism, 5(1). 19. https://molecularautism.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/. Accessed 15 Dec 2021.
Kaupins, G., Chenoweth, T., & Klein, F. (2020). Should college instructors reveal their high-functioning autism in the classroom? Journal of Education for Business, 95(8), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1716204
Lindsay, S., Osten, V., Rezai, M., & Bui, S. (2021). Disclosure and workplace accommodations for people with autism: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(5), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1635656
Loomes, R., Hull, L., Polmear, W., & Mandy, W. (2017). What is the male-to-female ratio in autism spectrum disorder? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry., 56(6), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.03.013
Mengel, F., Sauermann, J., & Zolitz, U. (2018). Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of the European Economics Association, 17(2), 535–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx057
Miller, S. R. (2010). Attitudes toward individuals with disabilities: Does empathy explain the difference in scores between men and women? Annals of Behavioral Science and Medical Education, 16(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355110
Miller, J., & Seldin, P. (2014). Changing Practices in Faculty Evaluations: Can Better Evaluation Make a Difference? Academe, 100(3), 35–38. https://www.aaup.org/article/changing-practices-faculty-evaluation#.YkIgUi3MJaQ. Accessed 15 Dec 2021
Morrison, K. E., DeBrabander, K. M., Faso, D. J., & Sasson, N. J. (2019). Variability in first impressions of autistic adults made by neurotypical raters is driven more by characteristics of the rater than by characteristics of autistic adults. Autism: the International Journal of Research and Practice, 23(7), 1817–1829. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318824104
Nettle, D. (2010). Empathizing and systemizing: What are they, and what do they contribute to our understanding of psychological sex differences? British Journal of Psychology, 98(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712606X117612
Pelleboer-Gunnink, H. A., van Oorsouw, W., van Weeghel, J., & Embregts, P. (2021). Familiarity with people with intellectual disabilities, stigma, and the mediating role of emotions among the Dutch general public. Stigma and Health, 6(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000228
Raufelder, D., Nitsche, L. Breitmeyer, S. Keßler, S. Herrmann, E., & Regner, N. (2016). Students’ perception of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ teachers: Results of a qualitative thematic analysis with German adolescents. International Journal of Educational Research 75, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.004
Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press.
Rutledge, R. B., Skandali, N., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). A computational and neural model of momentary subjective well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Sciences, 111(33), 12252–12257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407535
Sasson, N. J., & Morrison, K. E. (2019). First impressions of adults with autism improve with diagnostic disclosure and increased autism knowledge of peers. Autism, 23(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361317729526
Schmidt, A. F., & Finan, C. (2018). Linear regression and the normality assumption. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 98, 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.006
Seers, K., & Hogg, R. (2021). ‘You don't look autistic’: A qualitative exploration of women’s experiences of being the ‘autistic other’. Autism, 25(6), 1553–1564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361321993722
Thompson-Hodgetts, S., Labonte, C., Mazunder, R. & Phelan, S. (2020). Helpful or harmful? A scoping review of perceptions and outcomes of autism diagnostic disclosure to others. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101598
U. S. Department of Labor (2022). Details Report for: 25–1011.00 – Business Teachers, Postsecondary. https://www.onetonline.org/link/details/25-1011.00. Accessed 1 Nov 2022.
White, R., Barreto, M., Harrington, J., Kapp, S. K., Hayes, J., & Russell, G. (2019). Is disclosing an autism spectrum disorder in school associated with reduced stigmatization? Autism, 24(3), 744–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319887625
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approvals
Boise State University Institutional Review Board SB-IRB Notification of Exemption—076-SB21-035.
Disclosure
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare. The authors received no financial support for the research authorship and publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kaupins, G., Chenoweth, T. Impact of female and male university instructors revealing their high-functioning autism to their students. Curr Psychol 43, 214–222 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04268-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04268-y