Skip to main content
Log in

How to define a good recruiter: a dual-process model of recruiter effect

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the elaboration likelihood model (ELM), this paper aims to investigate a complete dual process model of the recruiter effect and the initiated role of recruiters’ social skills. Recruiters’ informativeness and affective delivery are two processing cues used separately by applicants in central and peripheral processing mechanisms, and hypothesized as the mechanisms underlying the recruiter effect. Two studies using higher education institutions’ recruitment populations were conducted to test three hypotheses. Outcomes from different recruitment stages were used separately in the two studies – informative usability and applicants’ satisfaction from the early stage (Study 1) and pursuit intention from the later stage (Study 2). Multilevel modeling was used for both studies. The results support three hypotheses. Specifically, recruiters with strong social skills demonstrate greater informativeness and affect, shown as higher recruiters’ informativeness and affective delivery. Applicants thus perceive the information provided to be usable, are satisfied with recruiters (Study 1), and have increased intentions to pursue the applied-for job (Study 2). This paper focuses on recruiters’ informativeness as the central cue and tests the possibility of multi-channel processing, making it the first investigation about ELM in recruitment after multi-channel processing was proposed. By thoroughly testing and extending ELM, the paper highlights the dual process model underlying the recruiter effect and the role of recruiters’ social skills. The investigation elucidates the factors initiating the recruiter effect and the corresponding influencing mechanism. Practical implications for organizations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This Paper was funded by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 31671121, 32171075).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Yao.

Ethics declarations

The authors do not have any interests that might be interpreted as influencing the research. Informed consent was obtained from the participants, and participants’ rights were protected. The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflict of interest

We confirm the presence of shared data for peer review. On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qu, X., Yao, X. & Zhang, W. How to define a good recruiter: a dual-process model of recruiter effect. Curr Psychol 42, 30111–30124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04030-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04030-w

Keywords

Navigation