Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A multilevel study of authentic leadership, collective efficacy, and team performance and commitment

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent societal and governmental concerns about transparency and corruption-free governance have created a need for a more transparent and fair leadership style. Resultantly, in the last decade, authentic leadership has been a focus of scholarly attention. Authentic leadership is a relatively emerging leadership style characterized by transparency and relational fairness. Taking a different and challenging route, this study focuses on team phenomena rather than individual outcomes. We develop a multilevel model in which we study the impact of authentic leadership on team performance and team commitment. Underlying psychological mechanisms are also uncovered, and we study the intervening role of collective efficacy. We collected data from 60 teams working in the manufacturing sector of Pakistan. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel structural equation modeling were conducted using Mplus. The results largely supported the study hypotheses and confirmed the direct and indirect effects of authentic leadership on team performance and team commitment. Theoretical contributions and practical implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Adil, A., & Kamal, A. (2020). Authentic leadership and psychological capital in job demands-resources model among Pakistani university teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(6), 734–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2019). Warning for excessive positivity: Authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(4), 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2018). SRMR in Mplus. Technical Rep. Mplus.

  • Ausar, K., Kang, H. J. A., & Kim, J. S. (2016). The effects of authentic leadership and organizational commitment on turnover intention. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(2), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Mhatre, K. H. (2012). Advances in theory and research on authentic leadership. In G. M. Spreitzer, & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 773–783). Oxford University Press.

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-self efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, C. T., Kavussanu, M., & Ong, C. W. (2019). Authentic leadership and task cohesion: The mediating role of trust and team sacrifice. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 23(3-4), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000105

  • Baquero, A., Delgado, B., Escortell, R., & Sapena, J. (2019). Authentic leadership and job satisfaction: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Sustainability, 11(8), 2412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG (J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. W., & Scott, K. D. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.1085.1033.1439.

  • Blake, N., Blayney, F., Loera, T., Rowlett, C., & Schmidt, D. (2012). A model of authentic leadership to support a healthy work environment. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 23(4), 358–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, A. M., Mellalieu, S. D., & Shearer, D. A. (2016). Observation as a method to enhance collective efficacy: An integrative review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 24, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, P., Singh, H., Singh, J., & Useem, M. (2010). The India way: How India’s top business leaders are revolutionizing management. Harvard Business Press.

  • Carlson, K. D., & Wu, J. (2012). The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3), 413–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Černe, M., Jaklič, M., & Škerlavaj, M. (2013). Authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation: A multilevel perspective. Leadership, 9(1), 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary, R., & Panda, C. (2018). Authentic leadership and creativity: The intervening role of psychological meaningfulness, safety and work engagement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 2071–2088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., & Bliese, P. D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self-and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., & Tjosvold, D. (2002). Conflict management and team effectiveness in China: The mediating role of justice. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 557–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2018). The servant leadership advantage: When perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. A., Dawkins, S., Martin, A., & Lewis, G. (2020). Putting the leader back into authentic leadership: Reconceptualising and rethinking leaders. Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 114–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., Ma, E., Lin, X., & Wang, Y.-C. (2022). Authentic leadership and engaging employees: A moderated mediation model of leader–member exchange and power distance. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 63(4), 479–489. 

  • Elrehail, H., Emeagwali, O. L., Alsaad, A., & Alzghoul, A. (2018). The impact of transformational and authentic leadership on innovation in higher education: the contingent role of knowledge sharing. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, H., & Bolin, J. (2017). Multilevel modeling using Mplus. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Frömmer, D., Hollnagel, G., Franke-Bartholdt, L., Strobel, A., & Wegge, J. (2021). Linking authentic leadership, moral voice and silence—A serial mediation model comprising follower constructive cognition and moral efficacy. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(4), 436–466.

  • Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. L., Karam, E. P., Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2021). Authentic leadership theory: The case for and against. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), 101495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B. (2003). The efficacy advantage: Factors related to the formation of group efficacy 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(10), 2153–2186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Earley, P. C. (2007). Collective cognition in action: accumulation, interaction, examination, and accommodation in the development and operation of group efficacy beliefs in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 438–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, E. A., Wu, D., & Passerini, K. (2010). Computer-supported team-based learning: The impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 55(1), 378–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, G., Walumbwa, F., Aryee, S., Butarbutar, I., & Chen, C. J. H. (2016). A multi-level investigation of authentic leadership as an antecedent of helping behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 373–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imam, H., Naqvi, M. B., Naqvi, S. A., & Chambel, M. J. (2020). Authentic leadership: unleashing employee creativity through empowerment and commitment to the supervisor. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 847–864.

  • International Labour Organization (2016). Retrieved 15 October 2021 from https://www.ilo.org/islamabad/whatwedo/projects/WCMS_388761/lang--en/index.htm

  • Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2002). Transformational leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research, 33(3), 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khilji, S. E., Keilson, B., Shakir, F. Y., & Shrestha, B. K. (2015). Self, follower, organization and the context–a cross cultural view of authentic leadership. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 4(1), 2–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khilji, S. E., & Rao, P. (2013). Management and culture in South Asia. In S. E. Khilji, & C. Rowley (Eds.), Globalization, change and learning in South Asia (pp. 83–100). Chandos Publishing.

  • Khilji, S. E., Tarique, I., & Schuler, R. S. (2015). Incorporating the macro view in global talent management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(3), 236–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khong, J. Z., Liem, G. A. D., & Klassen, R. M. (2017). Task performance in small group settings: the role of group members’ self-efficacy and collective efficacy and group’s characteristics. Educational Psychology, 37(9), 1082–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., & Mauno, S. (2016). Authentic leadership and team climate: testing cross-lagged relationships. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(2), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozub, S. A., & McDonnell, J. F. (2000). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in rugby teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23(2), 120–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladkin, D., & Taylor, S. S. (2010). Enacting the ‘true self’: Towards a theory of embodied authentic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagan, T. E. (2007). Examining authentic leadership: Development of a four-dimensional scale and identification of a nomological network. State University of New York at Albany.

  • LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852.

  • Lent, R. W., Schmidt, J., & Schmidt, L. (2006). Collective efficacy beliefs in student work teams: Relation to self-efficacy, cohesion, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, Q., Liu, F., & Wu, X. (2017). Servant versus authentic leadership: Assessing effectiveness in China’s hospitality industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Chen, J., & Tao, Y. (2015). Innovation performance in new product development teams in China’s technology ventures: The role of behavioral integration dimensions and collective efficacy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241–261). BarrettKoehler.

  • Lyubovnikova, J., Legood, A., Turner, N., & Mamakouka, A. (2017). How authentic leadership influences team performance: The mediating role of team reflexivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., Long, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., & Lam, C. K. (2017). Why do high-performance human resource practices matter for team creativity? The mediating role of collective efficacy and knowledge sharing. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3), 565–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A. H., Iqbal, M. Z., & Haq, M. I. U. (2021). Supervisees’ reactions to a concatenation of supervisors’ resource drain, ego depletion and abusive supervision. International Journal of Conflict Management, 32(2), 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, E., & Kavussanu, M. (2021). A comparison of authentic and transformational leadership in sport. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(7), 636–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. M. (2010). Servant leadership and follower need satisfaction. Servant Leadership (pp. 147–154). Springer.

  • McDowell, J., Huang, Y.-K., & Caza, A. (2018). Does identity matter? An investigation of the effects of authentic leadership on student-athletes’ psychological capital and engagement. Journal of Sport Management, 32(3), 227–242.

  • Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müceldili, B., Turan, H., & Erdil, O. (2013). The influence of authentic leadership on creativity and innovativeness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 673–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide (Version 7). Muthén & Muthén.

  • Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.

  • Ntontis, E., Drury, J., Amlôt, R., Rubin, G. J., Williams, R., & Saavedra, P. (2021). Collective resilience in the disaster recovery period: Emergent social identity and observed social support are associated with collective efficacy, well-being, and the provision of social support. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(3), 1075–1095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, J., Cho, D., & Lim, D. H. (2018). Authentic leadership and work engagement: the mediating effect of practicing core values. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(2), 276–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. E. (1994). Working together: Perceived self-and collective‐efficacy at the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, S., Alizadeh, A., Dooley, L. M., & Zhang, R. (2019). The effects of authentic leadership on trust in leaders, organizational citizenship behavior, and service quality in the Chinese hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 40, 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raziq, M. M., Borini, F. M., Malik, O. F., Ahmad, M., & Shabaz, M. (2018). Leadership styles, goal clarity, and project success: Evidence from project-based organizations in Pakistan. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(2), 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & e Cunha, M. P. (2012). Authentic leadership promoting employees’ psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 429–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rego, A., Vitória, A., Magalhães, A., Ribeiro, N., & e Cunha, M. P. (2013). Are authentic leaders associated with more virtuous, committed and potent teams? The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, M. L., Warka, J., Babasa, B., Betancourt, R., & Hooker, S. (1994). Development and validation of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 793–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roby, P. P. (2014). Ethical leadership in college athletics. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 7(1), 35–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahraei Beiranvand, M., Beiranvand, S., Beiranvand, S., & Mohammadipour, F. (2021). Explaining the effect of authentic and ethical leadership on psychological empowerment of nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(5), 1081–1090.

  • Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 863.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Xie, J. L. (2000). Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 512–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semedo, A. S. D., Coelho, A. F. M., & Ribeiro, N. M. P. (2017). Authentic leadership and creativity: The mediating role of happiness. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(3), 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si, J. (2020). The role of collective efficacy and co-regulation in medical students’ performance in small group contexts. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 32(2), 143–149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2011). Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stajkovic, A. D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A. J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Johnson, D. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 751–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, C., Mignonac, K., & Manville, C. (2015). When normative commitment leads to lower well-being and reduced performance. Human Relations, 68(5), 843–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Lawler, J. J., & Shi, K. (2004). The role of collective efficacy in the relations between transformational leadership and work outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(4), 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Liu, S. (2018). The interactive effect of authentic leadership and leader competency on followers’ job performance: The mediating role of work engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 763–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wombacher, J. C., & Felfe, J. (2017). Dual commitment in the organization: Effects of the interplay of team and organizational commitment on employee citizenship behavior, efficacy beliefs, and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. A., & Laschinger, H. K. (2013). Authentic leadership, performance, and job satisfaction: the mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(4), 947–959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, H. B., & Fang, P. (2014). Authentic leadership, collective efficacy, and group performance: An empirical study in China. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 42(6), 921–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, B.-D., Zhao, S.-K., Li, C.-R., & Lin, C.-J. (2017). Authentic leadership and employee creativity: Testing the multilevel mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 482–498.

  • Yavuz, M. (2020). Transformational leadership and authentic leadership as practical implications of positive organizational psychology. Handbook of research on positive organizational behavior for improved workplace performance (pp. 122–139). IGI Global.

  • Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., Zhang, M., Xu, S., Liu, X., & Newman, A. (2022). Antecedents and outcomes of authentic leadership across culture: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39, 1399–1435.

  • Zheng, X., Liu, X., Liao, H., Qin, X., & Ni, D. (2022). How and when top manager authentic leadership influences team voice: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Research, 145, 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lyallpur Business School, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Sharjeel Saleem

  2. School of Management, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an Shaanxi, China

    Mariam Ayub

  3. College of Business Administration, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

    Muhammad Mustafa Raziq

  4. NUST Business School, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Muhammad Mustafa Raziq

  5. Department of Management Science, National University of Modern Languages, 4 Khayaban-e-Johar, H 9/4, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Muhammad Zahid Iqbal

Authors
  1. Sharjeel Saleem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mariam Ayub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Mustafa Raziq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad Zahid Iqbal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharjeel Saleem.

Ethics declarations

All responses are anonymized, and respondents were informed about the research prior to data collection. The study was hence deemed low risk and did not require an ethical approval.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interests (financial or non-financial).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saleem, S., Ayub, M., Raziq, M.M. et al. A multilevel study of authentic leadership, collective efficacy, and team performance and commitment. Curr Psychol 42, 18473–18487 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04029-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04029-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation