Abstract
Research on romantic relationships has, among other details, focused on matching effect of attachment between dyadic partners, as matching perspective could reveal the interdependence and interplay between partners. However, how attachment matching relates to relationship quality has yielded inconsistent findings. The present study investigated the links between dyadic attachment matching and relationship quality among 434 dating couples and 929 married couples. We found that, in contrast with discrepancy in anxiety, congruence in anxiety does not always relate to a higher quality of relationship. Notably, the association between congruence in anxiety and relationship quality seems to be represented by a U curve, indicating that dyads with two highly anxious partners could cultivate a satisfying relationship. Furthermore, dyads with a larger discrepancy in avoidance were associated with higher relationship quality than dyads with a smaller discrepancy. The discussion focused on the dyadic regulation effect, especially the buffering and thriving effect for dyads with insecure partners.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Volume II: Separation, Anxiety and Anger. In Attachment and Loss: Volume II: Separation, Anxiety and Anger (pp. 1–429). The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford Press.
Buote, V. M., Wood, E., & Pratt, M. (2009). Exploring similarities and differences between online and offline friendships: The role of attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.022
Callaci, M., Péloquin, K., Barry, R. A., & Tremblay, N. (2020). A dyadic analysis of attachment insecurities and romantic disengagement among couples seeking relationship therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12422
Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020385
Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., Wu, T. F., & Wei, M. (2013). Attachment and the investment model: Predictors of relationship commitment, maintenance, and persistence. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 546–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01423.x
Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015). Thriving through relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.001
Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265007
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132
Friedkin, N. E. (2011). A formal theory of reflected appraisals in the evolution of power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212441349
Gallo, L. C., & Smith, T. W. (2001). Attachment style in marriage: Adjustment and responses to interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(2), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501182006
Guzmán-González, M., Contreras, P., & Casu, G. (2020). Romantic attachment, unforgiveness and relationship satisfaction in couples: A dyadic mediation analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(10–11), 2822–2842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520940399
Girme, Y. U., Overall, N. C., Simpson, J. A., & Fletcher, G. J. (2015). “All or nothing”: Attachment avoidance and the curvilinear effects of partner support. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 108(3), 450. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038866.supp
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
Holmes, B. M., & Johnson, K. R. (2009). Adult attachment and romantic partner preference: A review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(6–7), 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509345653
Humberg, S., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2019). Response surface analysis in personality and social psychology: Checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618757600
Ilmarinen, V.-J., Lönnqvist, J.-E., & Paunonen, S. (2016). Similarity-attraction effects in friendship formation: Honest platoon-mates prefer each other but dishonest do not. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.040
Kazim, S. M., & Rafique, R. (2021). Predictors of marital satisfaction in individualistic and collectivist cultures: A mini review. Journal of Research in Psychology, 3(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.31580/jrp.v3i1.1958
Krasikova, D. V., & LeBreton, J. M. (2012). Just the two of us: Misalignment of theory and methods in examining dyadic phenomena. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 739–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027962
La Valley, A. G., & Guerrero, L. K. (2012). Perceptions of conflict behavior and relational satisfaction in adult parent–child relationships: A dyadic analysis from an attachment perspective. Communication Research, 39(1), 48–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210391655
Lemay, E. P., & Dudley, K. L. (2011). Caution: Fragile! Regulating the interpersonal security of chronically insecure partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 681–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021655
Li, T., & Chan, D. K. S. (2012). How anxious and avoidant attachment affect romantic relationship quality differently: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1842
Iida, M., Seidman, G., & Shrout, P. E. (2018). Models of interdependent individuals versus dyadic processes in relationship research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517725407
Liu, J., Wang, Y., & Jackson, T. (2017). Towards explaining relationship dissatisfaction in Chinese dating couples: Relationship disillusionment, emergent distress, or insecure attachment style? Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.041
Miller, B. C. (1976). A multivariate developmental model of marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family. https://doi.org/10.2307/350684
Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1997). Are emotional and instrumental supportive interactions beneficial in times of stress? The impact of attachment style. Anxiety Stress and Coping, 10(2), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615809708249297
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The Attachment Behavioral System in Adulthood: Activation, Psychodynamics, and Interpersonal Processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35(03), 53–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(03)01002-5
Overall, N. C., & Simpson, J. A. (2015). Attachment and dyadic regulation processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.008
Overall, N. C., Simpson, J. A., & Struthers, H. (2013). Buffering attachment-related avoidance: Softening emotional and behavioral defenses during conflict discussions. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 104(5), 854. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031798
Overall, N. C., Girme, Y. U., Lemay, E. P., Jr., & Hammond, M. D. (2014). Attachment anxiety and reactions to relationship threat: The benefits and costs of inducing guilt in romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(2), 235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034371
Péloquin, K., Lafontaine, M. F., & Brassard, A. (2011). A dyadic approach to the study of romantic attachment, dyadic empathy, and psychological partner aggression. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(7), 915–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075103979
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Barrett, L. F. (1997). Working models of attachment and daily social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1409–1423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1409
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Barrett, L. F. (2000). The internal working models concept: What do we really know about the self in relation to others? Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.155
Roisman, G. I., Holland, A., Fortuna, K., Fraley, R. C., Clausell, E., & Clarke, A. (2007). The Adult Attachment Interview and self-reports of attachment style: An empirical rapprochement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 678. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.678
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101–117.
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., ... & ZupanÈiÈ, A. (2004). Patterns and universals of adult romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions: Are models of self and of other pancultural constructs?. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(4), 367-402.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022104266105
Schönbrodt, F. D., Humberg, S., & Nestler, S. (2018). Testing similarity effects with dyadic response surface analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32(6), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2169
Segal, N., & Fraley, R. C. (2016). Broadening the investment model: An intensive longitudinal study on attachment and perceived partner responsiveness in commitment dynamics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(5), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515584493
Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
Shiota, M. N., & Levenson, R. W. (2007). Birds of a feather don’t always fly farthest: Similarity in Big Five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in long-term marriages. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.666
Simpson, J. (2007). 25. Foundations of interpersonal trust. Paper presented at the Social psychology: handbook of basic principles.
Simpson, J. A., & Overall, N. C. (2014). Partner buffering of attachment insecurity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413510933
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Nelligan, J. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 62(3), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.434
Simpson, J. A., Overall, N. C., Farrell, A. K., & Girme, Y. U. (2016). Regulation Processes in Romantic Relationships. In K. D. Vohs, & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (3rd edition). New York: Guilford (pp. 283–304).
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 71(5), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.899
Sprecher, S., Schmeeckle, M., & Felmlee, D. (2006). The principle of least interest: Inequality in emotional involvement in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 27(9), 1255–1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x06289215
Strauss, C., Morry, M. M., & Kito, M. (2012). Attachment styles and relationship quality: Actual, perceived, and ideal partner matching. Personal Relationships, 19(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01333.x
Tan, R., Overall, N. C., & Taylor, J. K. (2012). Let’s talk about us: Attachment, relationship-focused disclosure, and relationship quality. Personal Relationships, 19(3), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01383.x
Tran, S., & Simpson, J. A. (2009). Prorelationship maintenance behaviors: The joint roles of attachment and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016418
Vandenberg, S. G. (1972). Assortative mating, or who marries whom? Behavior Genetics, 2(2), 127–157.
Wang, K., Frison, E., Eggermont, S., & Vandenbosch, L. (2018). Active public Facebook use and adolescents’ feelings of loneliness: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship. Journal of Adolescence, 67, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.05.008
Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701268041
Weidmann, R., Schönbrodt, F. D., Ledermann, T., & Grob, A. (2017). Concurrent and longitudinal dyadic polynomial regression analyses of Big Five traits and relationship satisfaction: Does similarity matter? Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.04.003
Wu, Y. Y., Stillwell, D., Schwartz, H. A., & Kosinski, M. (2017). Birds of a feather do flock together: Behavior-based personality-assessment method reveals personality similarity among couples and friends. Psychological Science, 28(3), 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616678187
Zhou, Y., Wang, K., Chen, S., Zhang, J., & Zhou, M. (2017). An Exploratory Investigation of the Role of Openness in Relationship Quality among Emerging Adult Chinese Couples. Frontiers in psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00382
Funding
This study is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant NO. 72004198).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, K., Li, F., Xu, J. et al. Insecure attachment may not hamper relationships: a dyadic fit perspective. Curr Psychol 42, 29215–29229 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04005-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04005-x