Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An item response theory analysis of Rosenberg Self-Esteem among older Korean adults

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Korean population is aging rapidly. An accurate measure of older adults’ self-esteem, a psychological factor used to diagnose behavior and mental health, is becoming increasingly relevant. Previous studies have used the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) to measure self-esteem, but most have conducted factor analysis based on the classic test theory. This study, in contrast, applied the item response theory to accurately test the validity and reliability of this measure of self-esteem among Korean older adults. The data used for analysis came from the Korean Welfare Panel Survey conducted in 2018, including 5,061 people aged 65 years or older. The analysis showed that item eight was a misfit, and items three, nine, and ten were challenging to answer. It was found that, as the response range, a 4-point Likert scale was appropriate, and most of the items between the old and young adults functioned differently. As a result, RSES is not suitable for use for the older Korean adults because it did not satisfy the construct validity. This analysis provides an academic basis for revising items of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale to measure self-esteem in older Korean adults accurately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data can be downloaded after permission is granted by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (T: +82-44-287-8000, E: master@kihasa.re.kr, H: https://www.koweps.re.kr).

References

  • Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (2016). Rasch rating-scale model. In W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory, volume one (pp. 103–122). Chapman and Hall/CRC.

  • Bae, H. N., Choi, S. W., Yu, J. C., & Lee, J. S. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Korean Version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (K-RSES) in adult. Mood & Emotion, 12(1), 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranik, L. E., Meade, A. W., Lakey, C. E., Lance, C. E., Hu, C., Hua, W., & Michalos, A. (2008). Examining the differential item functioning of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale across eight countries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(7), 1867–1904. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00372.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, R. C. L., Vidacovich, C., & Green, K. E. (2017). Rasch analysis of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale with African Americans. Psychological Assessment, 29(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B. G., & Jeon, G. Y. (1993). A study on the development of [the self-esteem inventory]. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 31(2), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen, S., Velozo, C. A., & Mann, W. C. (2007). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale as a measure of self-esteem for the noninstitutionalized elderly. Clinical Gerontologist, 31(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1300/J018v31n01_06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. Princeton.

  • Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, M. B., Ackerman, R. A., & Brecheen, C. (2016). Extending structural analyses of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale to consider criterion-related validity: Can composite self-esteem scores be good enough? Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1058268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Multivariate applications books series. Item response theory for psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • Farruggia, S. P., Chen, C., Greenberger, E., Dmitrieva, J., & Macek, P. (2004). Adolescent self-esteem in cross-cultural perspective: Testing measurement equivalence and a mediation model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(6), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022104270114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. M., & Jones, J. A. (1998). Uses of Rasch modeling in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.1.30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray-Little, B., Williams, V. S. L., & Hancock, T. D. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(5), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297235001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, E., Chen, C., Dmitrieva, J., & Farruggia, S. P. (2003). Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Do they matter? Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1241–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00331-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, S. M. (1995). An IRT investigation of the validity of non-patient analogue research using the Beck Depression Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.11.1.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, G., & Shin, S. J. (1999). A cultural profile of Korean society: From vertical collectivism to horizontal individualism. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 13(2), 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y. H., & Chung, J. K. (2007). Two-factor self-esteem scale: Individualistic and collectivistic factors. Korean Journal of Psychology, 21, 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S. H. (2000). The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, B. J. (1974). Self-esteem: A test of its measurability. Yonsei Nonchong, 11(1), 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, M., Kim, H., & Kang, M. (2020). Rasch calibration and optimal categorization of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale with Korean elite young soccer players. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 31(4), 662–671. https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2020.31.4.662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohout, F. J., Berkman, L. F., Evans, D. A., & Cornoni-Huntley, J. (1993). Two shorter forms of the CES-D depression symptoms index. Journal of Aging and Health, 5(2), 179–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KOSTAT (2019). Statistics Korea. https://sgis.kostat.go.kr/publicsmodel. Accessed 10 Oct 2021.

  • Lee, J. Y., Nam, S. K., Lee, M. K., Lee, J. H., & Lee, S. M. (2009). Rosenberg’ self-esteem scale: Analysis of item-level validity. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 21(1), 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. W. (2021). Validation of the social support scale for the middle and the elderly: An application of item response theory. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 52(1), 219–249. https://doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2021.52.1.219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. R. (2005). Relationships of self-esteem with family-, friend-, school-, leisure-, and job-related variables in early adolescence: Focusing on positive and negative self-evaluations. Studies on Korean Youth, 16(2), 263–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. R., Kim, S. H., & Bae, E. S. (2016). The study of multicultural acceptability of individualism-collectivism of elderly people according to values. Diaspora Studies, 10(1), 155–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2004). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. In E. V. Smith Jr., & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement: Theory, models and application (pp. 258–278). JAM Press.

  • Linacre, J. M. (2019). A user’s guide to winsteps-ministep: Rasch-Model computer programs. Program Manual 4.4.7. Chicago.

  • Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2006). Limited information goodness-of-fit testing in multidimensional contingency tables. Psychometrika, 71(4), 713–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, M. T., Boduszek, D., & Harvey, S. A. (2014). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A bifactor answer to a two-factor question? Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(6), 654–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, T., & Resnick, B. (2013). Self-esteem among nursing assistants: Reliability and validity of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 21(2), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.21.2.335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MOHW. (2019). Suicide prevention national action plan. Ministry of Health and Welfare.

  • Narimani, M., & Samadifard, H. (2017). Social health in the elderly: The role of self-esteem, self-efficiency and happiness. Aging Psychology, 3(3), 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2019). Pensions at a glance: Income and poverty of older people. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=69414. Accessed 10 Oct 2021.

  • Oh, Y. J., & Kim, H. D. (2018). A study on predictive factors of elderly suicidal ideation. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.2.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U., & Robins, R. W. (2019). Development of self-esteem across the lifespan. In D. P. McAdams, R. L. Shiner, & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 328–344). The Guilford Press.

  • Park, H. S. (2013). Development and validation of multicultural receptivity scale based on Rasch measurement model. The Korean Society of Educational Psychology, 27(2), 453–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. H., Min, S., Eoh, Y., & Park, S. H. (2021). The elderly living in single-person households in South Korea: A latent profile analysis of self-esteem, life satisfaction, and depression. Quality of Life Research, 30(4), 1083–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02693-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. Y., & Park, E. Y. (2019). The Rasch analysis of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1992. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01992

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Nielsen & Lydiche.

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). In J. Ciarrochi, & L. Bilich (Eds.), Acceptance and commitment therapy. Measures package (pp. 61–62). University of Wollongong.

  • Roth, M., Decker, O., Herzberg, P. Y., & Brähler, E. (2008). Dimensionality and norms of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in a German general population sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.3.190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., & Stuits, D. M. (1985). Factors defined by negatively keyed items: The result of careless respondents? Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(4), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seol, H. (2007). A psychometric investigation of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale using Rasch measurement. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 40(3), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2007.11909812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sick, J. (2010). Assumptions and requirements of Rasch measurement. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 14(2), 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook, S. C., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1989). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: A Monte Carlo study. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, R. F., & Chapman, E. S. (2005). An analysis of dimensionality using factor analysis (true-score theory) and Rasch measurement: What is the difference? Which method is better? Journal of Applied Measurement, 6(1), 80–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weijters, B., & Baumgartner, H. (2012). Misresponse to reversed and negated items in surveys: A review. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V. (2007). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II–Validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(2), 204–234.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H. K. (2016). Validation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale for people with physical disabilities: An application of the Rasch model. Korean Journal of Physical Multiple and Health Disabilities, 59(4), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.20971/kcpmd.2016.59.4.159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, S., Chen, J., Yu, X., & Sang, J. (2017). Mediator roles of interpersonal forgiveness and self-forgiveness between self-esteem and subjective well-being. Current Psychology, 36(3), 585–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Halla University, 28 Halla university-gil, 26404, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea

    Kyeongwon Lee

Authors
  1. Kyeongwon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

I am the sole author of this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyeongwon Lee.

Ethics declarations

Research materials availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Pre-registration statement

None.

Permission to reproduce material from other sources

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (IRB No. 18-014-00). 

Consent to participate

Informed consent was not required due to the retrospective nature of the study. 

Conflict of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K. An item response theory analysis of Rosenberg Self-Esteem among older Korean adults. Curr Psychol 42, 28984–28993 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03946-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03946-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation