Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling the factors related to sensibility in cyberbullying of university students

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is crucial to raise awareness against cyberbullying, increase sensibility, and identify effective factors to prevent this behavior. The purpose of this study is to model the factors associated with the cyberbullying sensibility of university students. 131 university students participated in the study. Participants were selected through purposive sampling based on their experience with using digital technologies. Data were collected using a self-description form and four scales. Partial Least Squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to model the variables associated with cyberbullying vulnerability. As a result of the research, while family harmony was associated with social media use intensity, multiscreen addiction, and psychological well-being, it was not associated with academic success. Social media use intensity is associated with multiscreen addiction. Multiscreen addiction is related to academic success and sensibility to cyberbullying. While there is no relationship between psychological well-being and academic success, there is a significant relationship between sensibility in cyberbullying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  • Akturk, A. O. (2015). Analysis of cyberbullying sensitivity levels of high school students and their perceived social support levels. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12(1), 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arifin, Z., Torro, S., & Harifayanti, F. W. (2021). The Relationship of the Level of Family Harmony to the Social Behavior of Students High School. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 603, 582–586.

  • Amholt, T. T., Dammeyer, J., Carter, R., & Niclasen, J. (2020). Psychological well-being and academic achievement among school-aged children: a systematic review. Child Indicators Research, 13(5), 1523–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41(4), 387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atman-Uslu, N., & Yildiz-Durak, H. (2022). Parental awareness and supervision to prevent cyberbullying: Scale adaptation and a review in terms of demographic variables. Children and Youth Services Review, 133, 106329.

  • Balhara, Y. P. S., Bhargava, R., & Chadda, R. K. (2017). Service development for behavioural addictions: AIIMS experience. Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India), 53(03), 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balhara, Y. P. S., Verma, K., & Bhargava, R. (2018). Screen time and screen addiction: Beyond gaming, social media and pornography-A case report. Asian journal of psychiatry, 35, 77–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, C. P., Bennardi, C., Williams, S., & Zlupko, T. (2021). Theoretically Predicting Cyberbullying Perpetration in Youth With the BGCM: Unique Challenges and Promising Research Opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.

  • Barlett, C., Chamberlin, K., & Witkower, Z. (2017). Predicting cyberbullying perpetration in emerging adults: A theoretical test of the Barlett Gentile Cyberbullying Model. Aggressive behavior, 43(2), 147–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, C. P., & Gentile, D. A. (2012). Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boer, M., Stevens, G. W., Finkenauer, C., & van den Eijnden, R. J. (2022). The complex association between social media use intensity and adolescent wellbeing: A longitudinal investigation of five factors that may affect the association. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2002). Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the general aggression model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1679–1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesur, S. E., Koca, B., Sayin, M., N., & Sancak, F. (2017). Emotional Intelligence Levels and Cyberbullying Sensibility among Turkish University Students. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(3).

  • Chang, F. C., Chiu, C. H., Chen, P. H., Miao, N. F., Chiang, J. T., & Chuang, H. Y. (2018). Computer/mobile device screen time of children and their eye care behavior: the roles of risk perception and parenting. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(3), 179–186.

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307–341). Sage Publications.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006

  • Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2009). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifacetednature of happiness. Social Indicators Research Series, 39, 67–100.

  • Duman Kula, M., Ekşi, H., & Demirci, İ. (2018). Aile Uyum Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Formunun Psikometrik Özellikleri. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.457082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durak, A., & Kaygin, H. (2020). Parental mediation of young children’s internet use: Adaptation of parental mediation scale and review of parental mediation based on the demographic variables and digital data security awareness. Education and Information Technologies, 1–22.

  • Ezewulu, P. O., & Ebenebe, R. C. (2022). Influence of Cyber-bullying on academic achievement of In-School adolescents in Anambra State, Nigeria. GPH-International Journal of Educational Research, 5(06), 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gezgin, D.M., & Çuhadar, C. (2012). Examination of cyberbullying sensibility levels of computer and instructional technologies department students’. Journal of Educational Researches, 2(2), 93–104.

  • Giumetti, G. W., & Kowalski, R. M. (2022). Cyberbullying via social media and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 101314.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Prentice-Hall.

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106e121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA.

  • Holt, M. K., Finkelhor, D., & Kantor, G. K. (2007). Hidden forms of victimization in elementary students involved in bullying. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, S. Z., & Kutty, F. M. (2020). The relationship between internet addiction and cyberbullying toward psychological well-being among teenagers. International Journal of Social Science Research, 2(3), 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., Mick, D. G., & Bearden, W. O. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199e218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose, P. E., Kljakovic, M., Scheib, E., & Notter, O. (2012). The joint development of traditional bullying and victimization with cyber bullying and victimization in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(2), 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamal, W., & Bahfiarti, T. (2022, January). The Impact of Smartphone Ussage Towards Family Harmony (A Study on Career Women in Makassar City). In Universitas Lampung International Conference on Social Sciences (ULICoSS 2021) (pp. 497–502). Atlantis Press.

  • Kardaras, N. (2016). Glow kids: How screen addiction is hijacking our kids-and how to break the trance. St. Martin’s Press.

  • Kavikondala, S., Stewart, S. M., Ni, M. Y., Chan, B. H., Lee, P. H., Li, K. K., McDowell, I., Johnston, I., Chan, J. M., Lam, S. S., Lam, T. H., W., Fielding, W. T., R., & Lam, W. W. (2016). Structure and validity of Family Harmony Scale: An instrument for measuring harmony. Psychological Assessment, 28(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Y., Zilanawala, A., Booker, C., & Sacker, A. (2018). Social media use and adolescent mental health: Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. EClinicalMedicine, 6, 59–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khalili-Mahani, N., Smyrnova, A., & Kakinami, L. (2019). To each stress its own screen: a cross-sectional survey of the patterns of stress and various screen uses in relation to self-admitted screen addiction. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(4), e11485.

  • Kırcallıoğlu, M., & Orhon, F. (2022). Relations of Cyber Bullying Sensitivity to Perceived Social Support and to Parent and Peer Attachments in High School Students. Current Research and Reviews in Psychology and Psychiatry, 2(1), 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, U., & Park, Y. S. (2006). Indigenous psychological analysis of academic achievement in Korea: The influence of self-efficacy, parents, and culture. International journal of Psychology, 41(4), 287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjell, O., Daukantaitė, N. E., Hefferon, D., K., & Sikström, S. (2016). The harmony in life scale complements the satisfaction with life scale: Expanding the conceptualization of the cognitive component of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 126(2), 893–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0903-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (2007). Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber victimisation.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4).

  • Lin, T. T., Kononova, A., & Chiang, Y. H. (2020). Screen addiction and media multitasking among American and Taiwanese users. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(6), 583–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Blum-Ross, A., Pavlick, J., & Olafsson, K. (2018). In the digital home, how do parents support their children and who supports them? Parenting for a Digital Future. Technical Report. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/87952/1/Livingstone_Parenting%20Digital%20Survey%20Report%201_Published.pdf

  • Ma, X. (2001). Bullying and being bullied: To what extent are bullies also victims? American educational research journal, 38(2), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mieczkowski, H., Lee, A. Y., & Hancock, J. T. (2020). Priming effects of social media use scales on well-being outcomes: the influence of intensity and addiction scales on self-reported depression. Social Media + Society, 6(4), 2056305120961784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukmina, M., Masrura, S. I., & Mahmud, N. (2021). The Effect of Family Harmony and School Environment on Students’ Learning Outcomes in Mathematics Subject. MaPan, 9(2), 292–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palladino, B. E., Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., Luik, P., Naruskov, K., Ucanok, Z., Dogan, A., SchultzeKrumbholz, A., Hess, M., Scheithauer, H. Perceived severity of cyberbullying: Differences and similarities across four countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1524.

  • Pinar, S. E., Cesur, B., Koca, M., Sayin, N., & Sancak, F. (2017). Emotional Intelligence Levels and Cyberbullying Sensibility among Turkish University Students. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(3).

  • Pinchot, J. L., & Paullet, K. L. (2013). Social networking: Friend or foe? A study of cyberbullying at a university campus. Issues in Information Systems, 14(2), 174–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przybylski, A. K., & Bowes, L. (2017). Cyberbullying and adolescent well-being in England: a population-based cross-sectional study. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 1(1), 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radovic, A., Gmelin, T., Stein, B. D., & Miller, E. (2017). Depressed adolescents’ positive and negative use of social media. Journal of adolescence, 55, 5–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raffone, A., Tagini, A., & Srinivasan, N. (2010). Mindfulness and the cognitive neuroscience of attention and awareness. Zygon®, 45(3), 627–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safaria, T. (2015). Are daily spiritual experiences, self-esteem, and family harmony predictors of cyberbullying among high school student. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 4(3), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarıtepeci, M. (2021). Multiple screen addiction scale: Validity and reliability study. Öğretim Teknolojisi ve Hayat Boyu Öğrenme Dergisi, 2(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. K., O’donnell, L., Stueve, A., & Coulter, R. W. (2012). Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. American journal of public health, 102(1), 171–177.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Seaward, B. L. (2020). Digital Screen Time: The New Social Addiction. Alternative and Complementary Therapies, 26(2), 64–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewall, C. J., Bear, T. M., Merranko, J., & Rosen, D. (2020). How psychosocial well-being and usage amount predict inaccuracies in retrospective estimates of digital technology use. Mobile Media & Communication, 8, 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920902830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, S., & Hoff, D. L. (2007). Cyber bullying: Clarifying legal boundaries for school supervision in cyberspace. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 1(1), 76–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simovska, V., Nordin, L. L., & Madsen, K. D. (2016). Health promotion in Danish schools: Local priorities, policies and practices. Health Promotion International, 31(2), 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippet, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spears, B. A. (2009). Cyber relationships: the new challenge for educators. Educational Technology Solutions, 31(1), 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthar, S. A., & Arts, U. (2020). Increasing screen time and gaming impact on children’s mental health during the covid-19 lockdown. Res Rev Int Multidisciplin J, 6, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanrıkulu, T., Kınay, H., & Arıcak, O. T. (2013). Cyberbullying Sensibility Scale: Validity and reliability study. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanrıkulu, T., Kınay, H., & Arıcak, O. T. (2015). Sensibility development program against cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 17(5), 708–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telef, B. B. (2013). The adaptation of psychological well-being into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education) 28(3), 374–384.

  • Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., & Martin, G. N. (2018). Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among US adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uysal, İ., Duman, G., Yazıcı, E., & Şahin, M. (2014). Öğretmen adaylarının siber zorbalık duyarlılıkları ve siber zorbalık duyarlılık ölçeğinin bazı psikometrik özellikleri. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2011). Cyberbullying: Predicting victimisation and perpetration. Children & Society, 25(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1994). Family functioning and academic achievement in middle school A social-emotional perspective. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 268–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2014). Mental health: a state of well-being. World Health Organization. Retrieved 03 April 2022, from http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/mental_health/en/

  • Wiguna, T., Minayati, K., Kaligis, F., Ismail, R. I., Wijaya, E., Murtani, B. J., & Pradana, K. (2021). The effect of cyberbullying, abuse, and screen time on non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents during the pandemic: a perspective from the mediating role of stress. Frontiers in psychiatry, 12, 743329.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Willard, N. (2005). Educator’s Guide to Cyberbullying Addressing the Harm Caused by Outline Social Cruelty. https://www.chino.k12.ca.us/site/handlers/filedownload.ashx?moduleinstanceid=24949&dataid=41040&FileName=EducatorsGuidetoCyberbullying.pdf

  • Yang, S. J., Stewart, R., Kim, J. M., Kim, S. W., Shin, I. S., Dewey, M. E., Maskey, S., & Yoon, J. S. (2013). Differences in predictors of traditional and cyber-bullying: a 2-year longitudinal study in Korean school children. European Child Adolescence Psychiatry, 22, 309–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz Durak, H. (2019). Investigation of nomophobia and smartphone addiction predictors among adolescents in Turkey: Demographic variables and academic performance. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 492–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz Durak, H. (2020). Modeling of variables related to problematic internet usage and problematic social media usage in adolescents. Current Psychology, 39(4), 1375–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz Durak, H., & Saritepeci, M. (2020). Examination of the relationship between cyberbullying and cyber victimization. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(10), 2905–2915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz Durak, H., Kidiman Demirhan, E., & Çitil, M. (2022). Examining the risk factors as the predictors of gifted and non-gifted high school students’ online game addiction: Personal variables, Academic variables, Contingencies of self-worth, Academic self-efficacy, and Metacognitive awareness levels. Computers and Education, 177, 104378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz-Durak, H. (2018). What would you do without your smartphone? adolescents’ social media usage, locus of control, and loneliness as a predictor of nomophobia. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 5(2), 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., Tang, H., Tian, Y., Wei, H., Zhang, F., & Morrison, C. M. (2013). Cyberbullying and its risk factors among Chinese high school students. School psychology international, 34(6), 630–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zink, J., Belcher, B. R., Kechter, A., Stone, M. D., & Leventhal, A. M. (2019). Reciprocal associations between screen time and emotional disorder symptoms during adolescence. Preventive Medicine Reports, 13, 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.01.014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded by any funding agencies or academic organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hatice YILDIZ DURAK.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

In addition, informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

YILDIZ DURAK, H., AVCI, Ü. Modeling the factors related to sensibility in cyberbullying of university students. Curr Psychol 42, 28356–28367 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03832-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03832-2

Keywords

Navigation