Abstract
Discipline-focused and dominance-focused authoritarian leadership are two different types of authoritarian leadership. While the detrimental effects of authoritarian leadership on employees’ organizational-focused voice have been established in the literature, we have yet to understand the relationships between different types of authoritarian leadership and employees’ self-interested voice. Drawing on uncertainty management theory, this research argues that discipline-focused authoritarian leadership will be negatively related to employees’ self-interested voice via decreased work alienation, whereas dominance-focused authoritarian leadership will be positively related to employees’ self-interested voice via increased work alienation. We also predict that employees’ perceived overqualification will moderate the relations between different types of authoritarian leadership and work alienation. We collected two-wave data from 495 employees and their direct supervisors. Our findings suggest that work alienation mediated the negative relationship between discipline-focused authoritarian leadership and self-interested voice. In contrast, work alienation mediated the positive relationship between dominance-focused authoritarian leadership and self-interested voice. Additionally, the positive relationship between dominance-focused authoritarian leadership and work alienation was enhanced for employees high in perceived overqualification. Our findings suggest managers display more discipline-focused authoritarian leadership than dominance-focused authoritarian leadership to reduce employees’ work deviation and self-interested voice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Due to the terms of the permission at the institute, we are not permitted to make the data available to the public. However, the data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Andel, S., Pindek, S., & Arvan, M. L. (2021). Bored, angry, and overqualified? The high-and low-intensity pathways linking perceived overqualification to behavioural outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1919624
Babakus, E., & Mangold, W. G. (1992). Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation. Health Services Research, 26(6), 767–786.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
Bashshur, M. R., & Oc, B. (2015). When voice matters: A multilevel review of the impact of voice in organizations. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1530–1554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314558302
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner, & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Sage Publications.
Chan, S. C. (2014). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice: Does information sharing matter? Human Relations, 67(6), 667–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713503022
Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 796–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410604
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Farh, J. L. (2000). A triad model of paternalistic leadership: Constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14, 3–64. (in Chinese).
Cheng, B. S., & Chou, L. F. (2005). Triad model of paternalistic leadership: Modern transformations and the influence mechanism (1/4) -- Triad model of paternalistic leadership: Constructs modification and retesting (Rep. NO. NSC 93-2413-H-002-003-PAE). Taipei: National Science Council. (In Chinese).
Chou, W. J., Chou, L. F., Cheng, B. S., & Jen, C. K. (2010). Juan-chiuan and shang-yan: The components of authoritarian leadership. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 34, 223–284. (in Chinese).
Chou, W. J., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Opening the black box: A two-dimensional model of authoritarian leadership and task performance. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 56(4), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.20140619
Conway, E., Monks, K., Fu, N., Alfes, K., & Bailey, K. (2020). Reimagining alienation within a relational framework: evidence from the public sector in Ireland and the UK. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(21), 2673–2694. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1460859
Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deng, H., Guan, Y., Wu, C. H., Erdogan, B., Bauer, T., & Yao, X. (2018). A relational model of perceived overqualification: The moderating role of interpersonal influence on social acceptance. Journal of Management, 44(8), 3288–3310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316668237
Dennerlein, T., & Kirkman, B. L. (2022). The hidden dark side of empowering leadership: The moderating role of hindrance stressors in explaining when empowering employees can promote moral disengagement and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of applied psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001013
Duan, J., Xu, Y., Wang, X., Wu, C. H., & Wang, Y. (2021). Voice for oneself: Self-interested voice and its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12334
Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Perceived overqualification and its outcomes: The moderating role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013528
Farh, J. L., Liang, J., Chou, L. F., & Cheng, B. S. (2008). Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In C. C. Chen, & Y. T. Lee (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories and practices (pp. 171–205). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Gu, J., Wang, G., Liu, H., Song, D., & He, C. (2018). Linking authoritarian leadership to employee creativity: The influences of leader-member exchange, team identification and power distance. Chinese Management Studies, 12(2), 384–406. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-10-2017-0294
Guo, L., Cheng, K., Luo, J., & Zhao, H. (2021). Trapped in a loss spiral: How and when work alienation relates to knowledge hiding. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1937672
Harari, M. B., Manapragada, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2017). Who thinks they’re a big fish in a small pond and why does it matter? A meta-analysis of perceived overqualification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.06.002
Hirschfeld, R. R., & Feild, H. S. (2000). Work centrality and work alienation: Distinct aspects of a general commitment to work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(7), 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1379(200011)21:7<789::AID-JOB59>3.0.CO;2-W
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Jermier, J. (1988). Sabotage at work: The rational view. In S. B. Bachrach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (6th ed., pp. 101–134). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Johnson, G. J., & Johnson, W. R. (2000). Perceived overqualification, positive and negative affect, and satisfaction with work. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(2), 167–184.
Kouchaki, M., & Desai, S. D. (2015). Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: How anxiety makes individuals feel threatened and commit unethical acts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037796
Lam, L. W., & Xu, A. J. (2019). Power imbalance and employee silence: The role of abusive leadership, power distance orientation, and perceived organisational politics. Applied Psychology, 68(3), 513–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12170
Lanaj, K., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2015). Leadership over-emergence in self-managing teams: The role of gender and countervailing biases. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1476–1494. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0303
Li, S., & Chen, Y. (2018). The relationship between psychological contract breach and employees’ counterproductive work behaviors: the mediating effect of organizational cynicism and work alienation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01273
Li, Y., & Sun, J. M. (2015). Traditional Chinese leadership and employee voice behavior: A cross-level examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.08.001
Li, R., Chen, Z., Zhang, H., & Luo, J. (2021). How do authoritarian leadership and abusive supervision jointly thwart follower proactivity? A social control perspective. Journal of Management, 47(4), 930–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319878261
Lind, E. A., & Van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. In B. M. Staw, & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (24 vol., pp. 181–223). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological methods, 18(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
Liu, S., & Wang, M. (2012). Perceived overqualification: A review and recommendations for research and practice. In P. Perrewé, J. Halbesleben, & C. Rosen (Eds.), The role of the economic crisis on occupational stress and well-being (10 vol., pp. 1–42). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. (Research in occupational stress and well-being.
Maden-Eyiusta, C. (2019). Role conflict, role ambiguity, and proactive behaviors: does flexible role orientation moderate the mediating impact of engagement? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(13), 2829–2855. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1616590
Mayer, D. M., Thau, S., Workman, K. M., Van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2012). Leader mistreatment, employee hostility, and deviant behaviors: Integrating self-uncertainty and thwarted needs perspectives on deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003
Maynard, D. C., Joseph, T. A., & Maynard, A. M. (2006). Underemployment, job attitudes, and turnover intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 509–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.389
Mitchell, R. G. (1984). Alienation and deviance: Strain theory reconsidered. Sociological Inquiry, 54(3), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1984.tb00063.x
Mitchell, M. S., Baer, M. D., Ambrose, M. L., Folger, R., & Palmer, N. F. (2018). Cheating under pressure: A self-protection model of workplace cheating behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000254
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506
Mottaz, C. J. (1981). Some determinants of work alienation. Sociological Quarterly, 22(4), 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1981.tb00678.x
Nair, N., & Vohra, N. (2009). Developing a new measure of work alienation. Journal of Workplace Rights, 14(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.2190/WR.14.3.c
Nair, N., & Vohra, N. (2010). An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Management Decision, 48(4), 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011041373
Pizzolitto, E., Verna, I., & Venditti, M. (2022). Authoritarian leadership styles and performance: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00263-y
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Qin, X., Chen, C., Yam, K. C., Huang, M., & Ju, D. (2020). The double-edged sword of leader humility: Investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(7), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000456
Revilla, M. A., Saris, W. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (2014). Choosing the number of categories in agree–disagree scales. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113509605
Schmidt, S., Roesler, U., Kusserow, T., & Rau, R. (2014). Uncertainty in the workplace: examining role ambiguity and role conflict, and their link to depression—a meta-analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.711523
Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software].
Shantz, A., Alfes, K., & Truss, C. (2014). Alienation from work: Marxist ideologies and twenty-first-century practice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(18), 2529–2550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.667431
Shantz, A., Alfes, K., Bailey, C., & Soane, E. (2015). Drivers and outcomes of work alienation: Reviving a concept. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492615573325
Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2008). Psychological threat and extrinsic goal striving. Motivation and Emotion, 32(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9081-5
Tang, W. G., & Vandenberghe, C. (2020). The reciprocal relationship between affective organizational commitment and role overload: When autonomy need satisfaction meets the individual self-concept. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(2), 353–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12295
Tangirala, S., Kamdar, D., Venkataramani, V., & Parke, M. R. (2013). Doing right versus getting ahead: The effects of duty and achievement orientations on employees’ voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1040–1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033855
Thau, S., Aquino, K., & Wittek, R. (2007). An extension of uncertainty management theory to the self: The relationship between justice, social comparison orientation, and antisocial work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.250
Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.003
Usman, M., Ali, M., Yousaf, Z., Anwar, F., Waqas, M., & Khan, M. A. S. (2020). The relationship between laissez-faire leadership and burnout: Mediation through work alienation and the moderating role of political skill. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 37(4), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1568
Van den Bos, K., & Miedema, J. (2000). Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.355
Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 931–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.931
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.5465/256902
Wang, L., & Xing, Z. (2019). A perspective of sense of power on dual authoritarian leadership and employee innovative behavior. Chinese Journal of Management, 16(7), 987–996. (in Chinese).
Wang, H. J., Le Blanc, P., Demerouti, E., Lu, C. Q., & Jiang, L. (2019). A social identity perspective on the association between leader-member exchange and job insecurity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6), 800–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1653853
Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.462
Wu, T. Y., Liu, Y. F., Hua, C. Y., Lo, H. C., & Yeh, Y. J. (2020). Too unsafe to voice? Authoritarian leadership and employee voice in Chinese organizations. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(4), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12247
Yao, L., Chen, X. P., & Wei, H. (2022). How do authoritarian and benevolent leadership affect employee work-family conflict? An emotional regulation perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09824-x\
Zhang, Y., Huai, M. Y., & Xie, Y. H. (2015). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.01.002
Zheng, Y., Graham, L., Farh, J. L., & Huang, X. (2019). The impact of authoritarian leadership on ethical voice: A moderated mediation model of felt uncertainty and leader benevolence. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04261-1
Zhu, Y., Chen, T., Wang, M., Jin, Y., & Wang, Y. (2019). Rivals or allies: How performance-prove goal orientation influences knowledge hiding. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 849–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2372
Zhou, X., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). The symbolic power of money: Reminders of money alter social distress and physical pain. Psychological Science, 20(6), 700–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02353.x
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 71772052).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Statement
This study informed the participants that their anonymity would be protected and their participation would be voluntary.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lou, M., Zhao, H., Ma, C. et al. Discipline vs. dominance: The relationships between different types of authoritarian leadership and employee self-interested voice. Curr Psychol 42, 27927–27941 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03812-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03812-6