Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supervisor negative feedback, subordinate prevention focus and performance: testing a mediation model

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study sought to establish and verify a mediating model to investigate the different effects of supervisor negative feedback on subordinate in-role and extra-role performance, and the mediating role of prevention focus in these relationships. A three-wave survey research design was applied to collect data from 356 Chinese employees and their immediate supervisors working at two manufacturing companies. Structural equation model was used to test the research hypotheses. The results indicated that supervisor negative feedback was positively correlated with subordinate prevention focus and in-role performance, but negatively correlated with extra-role performance. Additionally, prevention focus partially mediated the relationship between supervisor negative feedback and subordinate in-role performance, but did not mediate the relationship between supervisor negative feedback and subordinate extra-role performance. These results demonstrate the importance of supervisor feedback in affecting their subordinate regulatory focus, in-role performance and extra-role performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Alam, M., & Singh, P. (2021). Performance feedback interviews as affective events: An exploration of the impact of emotion regulation of negative performance feedback on supervisor–employee dyads. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 100740

    Google Scholar 

  • Audia, P. G., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Benefiting from negative feedback. Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 631–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. E., & Kernan, M. C. (2003). Matching commitment to supervisors and organizations to in-role and extra-role performance. Human Performance, 16(4), 327–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Beersma, B., Homan, A. C., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2013). Outcome interdependence shapes the effects of prevention focus on team processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(2), 194–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Belschak, F. D., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2009). Consequences of positive and negative feedback: The impact on emotions and extra-role behaviors. Applied Psychology, 58(2), 274–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 35–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2001). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge university press

  • Chen, Z., Lam, W., & Zhong, J. A. (2007). Leader-member exchange and member performance: a new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level empowerment climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 202–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E., Johnson, D. A., Moon, K., & Oah, S. (2018). Effects of positive and negative feedback sequence on work performance and emotional responses. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 38(2–3), 97–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Chughtai, A. A. (2020). Trust propensity and job performance: The mediating role of psychological safety and affective commitment. Current Psychology, 1-11

  • Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahling, J. J., Gabriel, A. S., & MacGowan, R. (2017). Understanding typologies of feedback environment perceptions: A latent profile investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 101, 133–148

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., Van Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers’ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 887–899

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., Schminke, M., De Schutter, L., & Stouten, J. (2018). The trickle-down effects of perceived trustworthiness on subordinate performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1335–1357

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, H., Yu, E., & Li, Y. (2020). Core self-evaluation, perceived organizational support for strengths use and job performance: Testing a mediation model. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01029-z

  • Earley, P. C., Wojnaroski, P., & Prest, W. (1987). Task planning and energy expended: An exploration of how goals influence performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, J. P., & Suh, J. H. (2019). Experience and behavior: How negative feedback in new versus experienced domains affects firm action and subsequent performance. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 309–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010). Leader–member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1085–1103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, N., Meacham, H., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Tham, T. L. (2019). Is coworker feedback more important than supervisor feedback for increasing innovative behavior? Human Resource Management, 58(4), 383–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedor, D. B., Davis, W. D., Maslyn, J. M., & Mathieson, K. (2001). Performance improvement efforts in response to negative feedback: The roles of source power and recipient self-esteem. Journal of Management, 27(1), 79–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedor, D. B., Eder, R. W., & Buckley, M. R. (1989). The contributory effects of supervisor intentions on subordinate feedback responses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44(3), 396–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbach, A., Eyal, T., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2010). How positive and negative feedback motivate goal pursuit. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8), 517–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischmann, G., De Witte, H., Sulea, C., & Iliescu, D. (2018). Qualitative job insecurity and in-role performance: a bidirectional longitudinal relationship? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(5), 603–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. D. (1979). Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinates: A laboratory investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(5), 533–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., Kouchaki, M., & Casciaro, T. (2020). Why connect? Moral consequences of networking with a promotion or prevention focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1221–1238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • González-Cruz, T. F., Botella-Carrubi, D., & Martínez-Fuentes, C. M. (2019). Supervisor leadership style, employee regulatory focus, and leadership performance: A perspectivism approach. Journal of Business Research, 101, 660–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Overstreet, B. L., Apodaca, S., McIntyre, A. L., Park, P., & Godbey, J. N. (2012). A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network: Work-related antecedents and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 160–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.).). Macmillan Publishing Company

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D., & Davis, C. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 550–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., & Pinelli, F. (2020). Regulatory focus and fit effects in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 25–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionescu, A. F., & Iliescu, D. (2021). LMX, organizational justice and performance: curvilinear relationships. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 36(2), 197–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Jason, V., & Geetha, S. N. (2021). Regulatory focus and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement. Current Psychology, 40(6), 2791–2803

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1991). Supervisory feedback: Alternative types and their impact on salespeople’s performance and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), 190–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Kark, R., & Van Dijk, D. (2007). Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 500–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Kark, R., Van Dijk, D., & Vashdi, D. R. (2018). Motivated or demotivated to be creative: The role of self-regulatory focus in transformational and transactional leadership processes. Applied Psychology, 67(1), 186–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. H., Diekmann, K. A., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2003). Flattery may get you somewhere: The strategic implications of providing positive vs. negative feedback about ability vs. ethicality in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(2), 225–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollée, J. A., Giessner, S. R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2013). Leader evaluations after performance feedback: The role of follower mood. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 203–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmann, J., Johnson, R. E., Wang, M., Lanaj, K., Wang, G., & Shi, J. (2018). A self-regulation perspective on how and when regulatory focus differentially relates to citizenship behaviors. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(5), 629–641

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P., Kumar, N., Aggarwal, P., & Yeap, J. A. (2021). Working in lockdown: the relationship between COVID-19 induced work stressors, job performance, distress, and life satisfaction. Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 40(12), 6308–6323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01567-0

  • Lanaj, K., Chang, C. H. D., & Johnson, R. E. (2012). Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: a review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 998–1034

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Liu, H., Shang, Y., & Xi, Y. (2014). Leader feedback and knowledge sharing: A regulatory focus theory perspective. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(6), 749–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 5–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854–864

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Anderson, R. D. (2002). Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 545–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Nease, A. A., Mudgett, B. O., & Quinones, M. A. (1999). Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptance of performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 806–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, M. J., Wu, C., & Roberts, J. A. (2013). The influence of ethical leadership and regulatory focus on employee outcomes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2), 269–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J., Cao, F., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhu, X., & Miao, D. (2021). Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making. Current Psychology, 40(6), 2927–2937

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrou, P., Baas, M., & Roskes, M. (2020). From prevention focus to adaptivity and creativity: the role of unfulfilled goals and work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 36–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrou, P., Van den Heuvel, M., & Schaufeli, W. (2017). The joint effects of promotion and prevention focus on performance, exhaustion and sickness absence among managers and non-managers. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1493–1507

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Farh, J. L. (1989). Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Irocesses, 44(1), 45–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Todor, W. M., & Skov, R. (1982). Effects of leader contingent and noncontingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 810–821

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. A., Kluemper, D. H., & Taylor, S. G. (2021). Too little and too much authority sharing: Differential relationships with psychological empowerment and in-role and extra‐role performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(8), 1099–1119

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparr, J. L., & Sonnentag, S. (2008). Fairness perceptions of supervisor feedback, LMX, and employee well-being at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 198–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Steelman, L. A., & Rutkowski, K. A. (2004). Moderators of employee reactions to negative feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(1), 6–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 165–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, W., Lin, X., & London, M. (2021). The influence of developmental feedback on voice: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 31(1), 19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, W., Lyu, B., & London, M. (2022). Relationships between developmental feedback, intrinsic motivation, and creative personality and performance. Psihologija, 55(1), 25–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, W., & Xiao, F. (2022). Supervisor positive feedback and employee performance: Promotion focus as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 50(2), 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tolli, A. P., & Schmidt, A. M. (2008). The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 692–701

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1084–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldersee, R., & Luthans, F. (1994). The impact of positive and corrective feedback on customer service performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(1), 83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C., & Chen, G. (2006). A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 529–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Zhao, Y., Qiu, L., & Zhu, Y. (2014). Effects of emoticons on the acceptance of negative feedback in computer-mediated communication. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 15(8), 454–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., Chen, M., Qian, J., Teng, X., & Zhang, W. (2021). Workplace ostracism and feedback-seeking behavior: a resource-based perspective. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01531-y

  • Weer, C. H., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2020). Managers’ assessments of employees’ organizational career growth opportunities: The role of extra-role performance, work engagement, and perceived organizational commitment. Journal of Career Development, 47(3), 280–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, L., Sun, J. M., & Jepsen, D. (2021). Feeling shame in the workplace: Examining negative feedback as an antecedent and performance and well-being as consequences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(9), 1244–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap, J. E., Bove, L. L., & Beverland, M. B. (2009). Exploring the effects of different reward programs on in-role and extra-role performance of retail sales associates. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 12(3), 279–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., & Li, J. (2018). The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic goals on work performance: Prospective and empirical studies on goal content theory. Personnel Review, 47(4), 900–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X., Diaz, I., Jing, Y., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2015). Positive and negative supervisor developmental feedback and task-performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(2), 212–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 413–422

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no funding for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Literature, Capital Normal University, 83 Xisanhuan North Road, Beijing, China

    Weilin Su & Yinan Zhang

Authors
  1. Weilin Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yinan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of two authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, W., Zhang, Y. Supervisor negative feedback, subordinate prevention focus and performance: testing a mediation model. Curr Psychol 42, 24613–24622 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03494-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03494-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation