Skip to main content
Log in

The cross-level influence of authoritarian leadership on counterproductive work behavior: A moderated mediation model

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Authoritarian leadership is a stressor that stimulates counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) among employees. Based on affective events theory, this study explored how authoritarian leadership affects employees’ targeted CWB and investigated the mediating role of negative affect. Drawing from social comparison theory, we further explored how relative leader-member exchange (RLMX) plays the role in the model. Through a questionnaire survey of 462 respondents from 93 teams in China, we constructed a cross-level moderated mediation model in Mplus to test our hypothesis. The results showed that (1) authoritarian leadership positively predicted employees’ organizational counterproductive work behaviors (CWB-O) but not interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors (CWB-I). Additionally, (2) RLMX positively moderated the relationship between authoritarian leadership and negative affect, and moderated the mediating effect of negative affect. Specifically, authoritarian leadership had a negative but non-significant influence on negative affect at a high level of RLMX. However, the predictive direction and strength of authoritarian leadership on negative affect turned to significantly positive and stronger under the low level of RLMX, which led to an increase in CWB-I and a decrease in CWB-O. The theoretical implications of these findings for advancing the research, the practical approaches to reduce employees’ CWB, and avenues for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Weimob (2022, April 26). Weimob Annual Report 2021. https://cdn2.weimob.com/saas/@assets/saas-fe-website-web-stc/pdf/ijm20madb3cf2k811m21hi20m0a488.pdf

References

Download references

Funding

This study is supported by Major Innovation & Planning Interdisciplinary Platform for the “Double-First Class” Initiative (19XNLG20), Renmin University of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work. Xinyue Hu conceived the idea of the study and contributed to data analysis, original writing and revision. Mingchao Dong contributed to data analysis. Yingwu Li revised the manuscript. Mengmeng Wang collected the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingwu Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the Ethics Committee of the Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, and written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects. All participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest. The authors are responsible for the content and writing of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 79 kb)

Supplementary file2 (SAV 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, X., Dong, M., Li, Y. et al. The cross-level influence of authoritarian leadership on counterproductive work behavior: A moderated mediation model. Curr Psychol 42, 23580–23593 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03491-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03491-3

Keywords

Navigation