Abstract
Whether multiple representations in visual working memory (VWM) can simultaneously guide attention is controversial. The multiple-item-template (MIT) hypothesis holds that multiple VWM representations can be active to guide visual attention simultaneously, whereas the single-item-template (SIT) hypothesis argues that only one VWM representation can interact with attention at a time. Recent study form (Fan et al., Acta Psychologica 192:126–137, 2019) provided strong evidence on MIT through the method of comparing the patterns of guidance effects in different experimental conditions. In the present study, we aimed to reexamine SIT and MIT by sharing a new condition wherein two search distractors match the single memory representation, using the original Fan et al. tilted-line search task. The guidance effect when two colored-shapes were held in VWM and both were present as distractors in the search array were observed and equal to that when the single colored-shape in VWM matched two of the distractors, which is consistent with the hypothesis of MIT. Moreover, the comparison on the degree of linear fitting between the actual data and two hypothesized models according to SIT and MIT showed that the Model of MIT fits the data best with a higher R2 of 0.125.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data statement
The datasets generated or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Akaike, H. (1974). A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723
Bahle, B., Thayer, D. D., Mordkoff, J. T., & Hollingworth, A. (2020). The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(5), 967–983. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000694
Beck, V. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2017). Competition in saccade target selection reveals attentional guidance by simultaneously active working memory representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(2), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000306
Beck, V. M., Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2012). Simultaneous control of attention by multiple working memory representations. Psychological Science, 23(8), 887–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612439068
Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations. Acta Psychologica (Amst), 137(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.012
Chen, Y., & Du, F. (2017). Two visual working memory representations simultaneously control attention. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 6107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05865-1
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03400.x
Downing, P. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11(6), 467. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00290
Downing, P., & Dodds, C. (2004). Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition, 11(6), 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280344000446
Dube, B., Basciano, A., Emrich, S. M., & Al-Aidroos, N. (2016). Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 78(5), 1232–1244. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1105-8
Emrich, S. M., Lockhart, H. A., & Al-Aidroos, N. (2017). Attention mediates the flexible allocation of visual working memory resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 43(7), 1454–1465. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000398
Fan, L., Xu, M., Najam, U. H., Sun, M., & Zhang, X. (2018). Attentional guidance from two representations of the same or different dimensions in visual working memory. Current Psychology, 8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9949-9
Fan, L., Sun, M., Xu, M., Li, Z., Diao, L., & Zhang, X. (2019). Multiple objects in visual working memory guide attention simultaneously: The type of memory-matching objects matters. Acta Psychologica, 192, 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.005
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Foerster, R. M., & Schneider, W. X. (2018). Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner. Cognition, 172, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.002
Gunseli, E., Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2016). Task-irrelevant memories rapidly gain attentional control with learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(3), 354–362.
Hollingworth, A., & Beck, V. M. (2016). Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 911–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000230
Hollingworth, A., & Hwang, S. (2013). The relationship between visual working memory and attention: Retention of precise colour information in the absence of effects on perceptual selection. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 368(1628), 20130061. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0061
Huynh Cong, S., & Kerzel, D. (2021). Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 1093–1111. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01881-5
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of The American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2)
Olivers, C. N. L. (2009). What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1275–1291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013896
Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1243–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243
Olivers, C. N., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15(7), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.004
Peters, J. C., Goebel, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2009). Remembered but unused: The accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(6), 1081–1091. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21083
Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 730–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.730
Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 31(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.248
Soto, D., Hodsoll, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12(9), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.007
Schwarz, G. E. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464
van Moorselaar, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. (2014). In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 40(4), 1450–1464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036229
Zhang, B., Zhang, J. X., Huang, S., Kong, L., & Wang, S. (2011). Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory. Vision Research, 51(23–24), 2356–2361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.008
Zhou, C., Lorist, M. M., & Mathôt, S. (2020). Concurrent guidance of attention by multiple working memory items: behavioral and computational evidence. Attention Perception & Psychophysics(5890). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02048-5
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences youth program of Ministry of Education of China (20YJC190003), Scientific and Technological Innovation 2030 (No. 2021ZD0204300), General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271083) (to XZ), and the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61632014) (to XZ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
Neither author has any conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, L., Diao, L., Xu, M. et al. Multiple representations in visual working memory can simultaneously guide attention. Curr Psychol 42, 22320–22327 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03332-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03332-3