Skip to main content
Log in

Belief in a just world and bullying defending behavior among adolescents: Roles of self-efficacy and responsibility

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Defending behavior represents any prosocial behavior taken to assist an individual being bullied, which has received increased attention in developmental science and is an important component of anti-bullying interventions. This study aims to explore the relationship between belief in a just world (BJW) and bullying defending behavior among adolescents in the Chinese cultural context, the role of self-efficacy, responsibility, and gender. This study recruited 837 students (50.29% boys, Mage = 13.6 years, SD = 0.79 years) from three junior middle schools in Zhejiang, China, using a convenience sampling method. The results show that: (1) BJW, self-efficacy, responsibility, and defending behavior are all significantly correlated; (2) BJW indirectly predicts defending behavior through the mediation of self-efficacy and responsibility, and serial mediation of self-efficacy and responsibility. (3) There are gender differences in the relationship between self-efficacy and responsibility. Compared with girls, boys’ self-efficacy has a stronger predictive effect on responsibility, and they display more defending behavior. The research reveals that defending behavior can be effectively promoted by enhancing students’ BJW, self-efficacy, and responsibility, providing theoretical reference and practical advice for intervention in bystander behavior in school bullying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Authors can confirm that all relevant data are included in the article and/or its supplementary information files and data can be made available upon request from the authors.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank students in the lab for assistance with the experiments. This research was supported by the National Education Science Planning project “Mechanism and Intervention Countermeasures of bullying behaviour in primary and secondary schools” (BHA190150).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Lin Zhang and Lan Jiao conceived and designed the study. The two authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-corresponding author.Yanling Chen and Siyao Wang performed the study and wrote the paper. The two authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors. Shen Liu, Xinwei Hong, and Junmeng Zheng reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lan Jiao or Lin Zhang.

Ethics declarations

The study uses data from teenagers who participated in the research voluntarily. The whole data collection was done anonymously. All respondents had been informed that they could skip any question that made them feel uncomfortable or abandon the study at any time. Written informed consent was obtained from their parents.

Informed Consent

Participants provided informed consent before completing the demographic measures and each of the study measures. 

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Wang, S., Liu, S. et al. Belief in a just world and bullying defending behavior among adolescents: Roles of self-efficacy and responsibility. Curr Psychol 42, 21532–21540 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03198-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03198-5

Keywords

Navigation