Abstract
Defending behavior represents any prosocial behavior taken to assist an individual being bullied, which has received increased attention in developmental science and is an important component of anti-bullying interventions. This study aims to explore the relationship between belief in a just world (BJW) and bullying defending behavior among adolescents in the Chinese cultural context, the role of self-efficacy, responsibility, and gender. This study recruited 837 students (50.29% boys, Mage = 13.6 years, SD = 0.79 years) from three junior middle schools in Zhejiang, China, using a convenience sampling method. The results show that: (1) BJW, self-efficacy, responsibility, and defending behavior are all significantly correlated; (2) BJW indirectly predicts defending behavior through the mediation of self-efficacy and responsibility, and serial mediation of self-efficacy and responsibility. (3) There are gender differences in the relationship between self-efficacy and responsibility. Compared with girls, boys’ self-efficacy has a stronger predictive effect on responsibility, and they display more defending behavior. The research reveals that defending behavior can be effectively promoted by enhancing students’ BJW, self-efficacy, and responsibility, providing theoretical reference and practical advice for intervention in bystander behavior in school bullying.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Authors can confirm that all relevant data are included in the article and/or its supplementary information files and data can be made available upon request from the authors.
References
Armitage, R. (2021). Bullying in children: Impact on child health. BMJ Paediatrics Open, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000939
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Berman, S. (1997). Children’s social consciousness and the development of social responsibility. SUNY Press
Bierhoff, H. W., Klein, R., & Kramp, P. (1991). Evidence for the altruistic personality from data on accident research. Journal of Personality, 59, 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00776.x
Casey, E. A., Lindhorst, T., & Storer, H. L. (2017). The situational-cognitive model of adolescent bystander behavior: Modeling bystander decision-making in the context of bullying and teen dating violence. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000033
Correia, I., & Dalbert, C. (2007). Belief in a just world, justice concerns, and well-being at Portuguese schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173464
Correia, I., & Dalbert, C. (2008). School bullying: Belief in a personal just world of bullies, victims, and defenders. European Psychologist, 13(4), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.248
Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12(2), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022091609047
Demaray, M. K., Summers, K. H., Jenkins, L. N., & Becker, L. D. (2016). Bullying participant behaviors questionnaire (BPBQ): Establishing a reliable and valid measure. Journal of School Violence, 15(2), 158–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.964801
Fox, C. L., Elder, T., Gater, J., & Johnson, E. (2010). The association between adolescents’ beliefs in a just world and their attitudes to victims of bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479105
Gao, X. Y., Chen, H. Y., Wu, J., & Huang, Z. J. (2021). Task performance: Report on the study on social and emotional skills of Chinese adolescence(I). Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 39(9), 33–46 [In Chinese]
Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050
Hu, J. S., Wang, H. X., Ye, C., & Fu, Y. L. (2014). Integrated theory of moral conviction in justice research. Advances in Psychology, 4(4), 585–593 [In Chinese]
Huang, S. L., Han, M. Y., & Zhang, M. (2016). The impact of interpersonal relationship on social responsibility. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(5), 578–587 [In Chinese]
Hymel, S., McClure, R., Miller, M., Shumka, E., & Trach, J. (2015). Addressing school bullying: Insights from theories of group processes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.008
Lynn Hawkins, D., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10(4), 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00178
Igou, E. R., Blake, A. A., & Bless, H. (2021). Just-world beliefs increase helping intentions via meaning and affect. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(5), 2235–2253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.008
Jenkins, L. N., & Nickerson, A. B. (2017). Bullying participant roles and gender as predictors of bystander intervention. Aggressive Behavior, 43(3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21688
Lam, C. B., Solmeyer, A. R., & McHale, S. M. (2012). Sibling relationships and empathy across the transition to adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(12), 1657–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9781-8
Lambe, L. J., Della Cioppa, V., Hong, I. K., & Craig, W. M. (2019). Standing up to bullying: A social-ecological review of peer defending in offline and online contexts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.007
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026570
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum
Li, S., Ran, G. M., Zhang, Q., & Hu, T. Q. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relationship between self-efficacy and mental health with Chinese Samples. Psychological Development and Education, 35(6), 759–768 [In Chinese]
Liu, W., Qiu, G., Zhang, S. X., & Fan, Q. (2021). Corporal punishment, self-control, parenting style, and school bullying among Chinese adolescents: A Conditional Process analysis. Journal of School Violence, 15, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2021.1985323
Locke, E. A. (1987). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306538
Ma, T. L., & Chen, W. T. (2017). The benefits of being defended: Perceived bystander participant roles and victims’ emotional and psycho social adjustment. Journal of School Violence, 16(4), 1–38 [In Chinese]
Midgett, A., & Doumas, D. M. (2019). Witnessing bullying at school: The association between being a bystander and anxiety and depressive symptoms. School Mental Health, 11(3), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-019-09312-6
Nickerson, A. B., Aloe, A. M., Livingston, J. A., & Feeley, T. H. (2014). Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment. Journal of Adolescence, 37(4), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.003
Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Thornberg, R. (2016). Bullying and defending behavior: The role of explicit and implicit moral cognition. Journal of School Psychology, 59, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.09.005
Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Thornberg, R. (2017). Getting angry matters: Going beyond perspective taking and empathic concern to understand bystanders’ behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 61, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.09.011
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Qiu, X. Y., Yang, Y. C., Liu, X. Q., & Wang, X. F. (2020). Reliability and validity of Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire in Chinese college student. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 311–315 [In Chinese]
Saarento, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). The role of classroom peer ecology and bystanders’ responses in bullying. Child Development Perspectives, 9(4), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12140
Schwarzer, R., Mueller, J., & Greenglass, E. (1999). Assessment of perceived general self-efficacy on the internet: Data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety Stress and Coping, 12(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615809908248327
Singg, S., & Ader, J. A. (2001). Development of the student personal responsibility scale-10. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29(4), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2001.29.4.331
Strelan, P., Di Fiore, C., & Prooijen, J. W. V. (2017). The empowering effect of punishment on forgiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 472–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2254
Su, Z. Q., Zhang, D. J., & Wang, X. Q. (2012). Revising of belief in a just world scale and its reliability and validity in college students. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science, 21(6), 561–563 [In Chinese]
Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Elmelid, R., Johansson, A., & Mellander, E. (2020). Standing up for the victim or supporting the bully? Bystander responses and their associations with moral disengagement, defender self-efficacy, and collective efficacy. Social Psychology of Education, 23(3), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09549-z
Wang, C. K., Hu, Z. F., & Liu, Y. (2001). Evidences for reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of General Self-Efficacy Scale. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 7(1), 37–40 [In Chinese]
Yi, M., Tian, Y., Ming, H., Huang, S. L., & Xin, Z. Q. (2019). Relationship between belief in a just world and social responsibility among undergraduate students: The mediating role of interpersonal trust and the gender difference. Psychological Development and Education, 35(3), 282–287 [In Chinese]
Zhang, J. J., & Ma, L. J. (2011). On ultimate duty and its social psychological mechanism. Journal of South China Normal University(Social Science Edition), 40(6), 110–119 [In Chinese]
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank students in the lab for assistance with the experiments. This research was supported by the National Education Science Planning project “Mechanism and Intervention Countermeasures of bullying behaviour in primary and secondary schools” (BHA190150).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Lin Zhang and Lan Jiao conceived and designed the study. The two authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-corresponding author.Yanling Chen and Siyao Wang performed the study and wrote the paper. The two authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors. Shen Liu, Xinwei Hong, and Junmeng Zheng reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The study uses data from teenagers who participated in the research voluntarily. The whole data collection was done anonymously. All respondents had been informed that they could skip any question that made them feel uncomfortable or abandon the study at any time. Written informed consent was obtained from their parents.
Informed Consent
Participants provided informed consent before completing the demographic measures and each of the study measures.
Conflict of Interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Wang, S., Liu, S. et al. Belief in a just world and bullying defending behavior among adolescents: Roles of self-efficacy and responsibility. Curr Psychol 42, 21532–21540 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03198-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03198-5