Abstract
Family has been widely considered as one of the most important resources for released prisoners in their reentry process. The current study examined the relationships between returning offenders and their spouses in terms of anger expressions, dysfunctional communication patterns, family cohesion, and adaptability. 243 released Korean prisoners and their spouses, who received housing assistance from the Korean Rehabilitation Agency (KRA), participated in the study. The dyadic data was analyzed using APIMeM (the actor-partner interdependence mediation model). Released prisoners’ displays of anger were associated with their own and spouses’ reduced family cohesion and adaptability through their own and spouses’ dysfunctional communication patterns. Spouses’ suppression of anger was associated with their own and offenders’ reduced family cohesion and adaptability through spouses’ dysfunctional communication, while offenders’ suppression of anger was only associated with their own dysfunctional communication. The findings suggest that relationships between offenders and their family members should be better understood and considered an important factor in the context of prisoner reentry. The limitations and implications of this study are also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, S. A. (1986). Cohesion, adaptability and communication: A test of an Olson Circumplex Model hypothesis. Family Relations, 35(2), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/583637
Bahr, S. J., Harris, L., Fisher, J. K., & Armstrong, A. H. (2009). Successful reentry: What differentiates successful and unsuccessful parolees?. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(5), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x09342435
Barnes, H. L., & Olson, D. H. (1985). Parent-adolescent communication and the Circumplex Model. Child Development, 56(2), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129732
Berg, M. T., & Huebner, B. M. (2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 382–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.498383
Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., Bradbury, T. N., Gmelch, S., & Ledermann, T. (2010). Stress, anger, and verbal aggression in intimate relationships: Moderating effects of individual and dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510361616
Brauer, K., & Proyer, R. T. (2020). Dyadic effects. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1222–1226). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_656-1
Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.73
Christensen, A., & Sullaway, M. (1984). Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Unpublished questionnaire.
Cobbina, J. E., Huebner, B. M., & Berg, M. T. (2012). Men, women, and postrelease offending: An examination of the nature of the link between relational ties and recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 58(3), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128710382348
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Connell, A. M., Dishion, T. J., Yasui, M., & Kavanagh, K. (2007). An adaptive approach to family intervention: Linking engagement in family-centered intervention to reductions in adolescent problem behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(4), 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.75.4.568
Davis, C., Bahr, S. J., & Ward, C. (2012). The process of offender reintegration: Perceptions of what helps prisoners reenter society. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 13(4), 446–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895812454748
Fosco, G. M., & Lydon-Staley, D. M. (2020). Implications of family cohesion and conflict for adolescent mood and well-being: Examining within- and between-family processes on a daily timescale. Family Process, 59(4), 1672–1689. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12515
Hahn, D. W., Chon, K. K., Lee, C. H., & Spielberger, C. D. (1997). Korean adaptation of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory: Anger and blood pressure. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 2(1), 60–78.
Hairston, C. F. (2004). Prisoners and their families: parenting issues during incarceration. In M. Waul & J. Travis (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities (pp. 259–282). Urban Institute Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-1257
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
Howells, K., Day, A., Williamson, P., Bubner, S., Jauncey, S., Parker, A., & Heseltine, K. (2005). Brief anger management programs with offenders: Outcomes and predictors of change. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 16(2), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940500096099
Huebner, B. M., DeJong, C., & Cobbina, J. (2010). Women coming home: Long-term patterns of recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 225–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902870486
Huffman, A. H., Matthews, R. A., & Irving, L. H. (2016). Family fairness and cohesion in marital dyads: Mediating processes between work-family conflict and couple psychological distress. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12165
Jenkins, J. M. (2000). Marital conflict and children’s emotions: The development of an anger organization. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 723–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00723.x
Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6(4), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00202.x
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., Cook, W. L., & Simpson, J. A. (2006). Dyadic Data Analysis (Methodology in the Social Sciences). The Guilford Press.
Ko, E. M. (2009). A study on an influence of family cohesion, family adaptability and parent-child communication of adolescents with hearing impairment on self-esteem. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Sungkyunkwan University.
Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 15(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2002.15.1.58
La Vigne, N. G., Visher, C., & Castro, J. (2004). Chicago prisoners’ experiences returning home. Urban Institute.
Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099
Lim, J.-W., & Shon, E.-J. (2018). The dyadic effects of family cohesion and communication on health-related quality of life: The moderating role of sex. Cancer Nursing, 41(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1097/ncc.0000000000000468
Liu, L., & Visher, C. A. (2019). The crossover of negative emotions between former prisoners and their family members during reunion: A test of general strain theory. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 58(7), 567–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2019.1635243
Luo, S. (2017). Assortative mating and couple similarity: Patterns, mechanisms, and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(8), e12337. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12337
Maynard, P. E., & Olson, D. H. (1987). Circumplex model of family systems: A treatment tool in family counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 65(9), 502–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1987.tb00766.x
Mills, A., & Codd, H. (2008). Prisoners’ families and offender management: Mobilizing social capital. Probation Journal, 55(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550507085675
Ministry of Justice. (2020) Statistical yearbook. Republic of Korea Ministry of Justice https://www.moj.go.kr/moj/422/subview.do
Mitchell, D. B., Szczerepa, A., & Hauser-Cram, P. (2016). Spilling over: Partner parenting stress as a predictor of family cohesion in parents of adolescents with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 49–50, 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.12.007
Mowen, T. J., & Visher, C. A. (2015). Drug use and crime after incarceration: The role of family support and family conflict. Justice Quarterly, 32(2), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.771207
Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., Sekol, I., & Olsen, R. F. (2009). Effects of parental imprisonment on child antisocial behaviour and mental health: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 1–105. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2009.4
Naser, R. L., & La Vigne, N. G. (2006). Family Support in the prisoner reentry process. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1300/j076v43n01_05
Naser, R. L., & Visher, C. A. (2006). Family members’ experiences with incarceration and reentry. Western Criminology Review, 7(2), 20–31.
Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex Model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00144
Olson, D. H., Portner, J., & Lavee, Y. (1985). Faces III: Family social science, University of Minnesota.
Papp, L. M., Kouros, C. D., & Cummings, E. M. (2010). Emotions in marital conflict interactions: Empathic accuracy, assumed similarity, and the moderating context of depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509348810
Petersilia, J. (2001). Prisoner reentry: Public safety and reintegration challenges. The Prison Journal, 81(3), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885501081003004
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879
Salazar, L. R. (2015). The negative reciprocity process in marital relationships: A literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.008
Raphael, S. (2011). Incarceration and Prisoner Reentry in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 635(1), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716210393321
Rose, D. R., & Clear, T. R. (2003). Incarceration, reentry, and social capital: Social networks in the balance. In M. Waul & J. Travis (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities (pp. 313–341). Urban Institute Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-1257
Spielberger C.D., Krasner S.S., Solomon E.P. (1988) The Experience, expression, and control of anger. In M. P. Janisse (Ed.), Individual Differences, Stress, and Health Psychology (pp. 89–108). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3824-9_5
Taylor, C. J. (2015). Gendered pathways to recidivism: Differential effects of family support by gender. Women & Criminal Justice, 25(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2014.989305
Uruk, A. Ç., Sayger, T. V., & Cogdal, P. A. (2007). Examining the influence of family cohesion and adaptability on trauma symptoms and psychological well-being. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 22(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1300/J035v22n02_05
Yeon, W.-S., & Chae, P. K. (2014). The effects of couple and sexual communication training programs on the marital and sexual satisfaction. Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Korea, 14(1), 1–19.
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A3A2A02089682)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, H., Lim, H., Kim, H. et al. The association between offenders’ and spouses’ anger, dysfunctional communication, and family cohesion and adaptability in prisoner reentry: An actor-partner interdependence mediation model. Curr Psychol 42, 13733–13743 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02711-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02711-0