Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“If you keep talking, I’ll leave”: The impact of workplace interpersonal capitalization on contact avoidance

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on interpersonal capitalization has focused mainly on its positive influence, paying little attention to its dark side. Drawing on affective events theory, we developed a moderated mediation model in which coworkers’ workplace interpersonal capitalization affects employees’ contact avoidance via anxiety, with prevention focus as a second-stage moderator. Data were collected in two waves from 289 full-time employees of organizations in China and path analysis was used to test our hypotheses. The results demonstrated that anxiety mediated the relationship between coworkers’ workplace interpersonal capitalization and employees’ contact avoidance. This positive indirect effect was moderated by prevention focus, such that anxiety had a stronger mediating effect when the level of prevention focus was high (vs. low). The findings of this research identified an important factor that can induce anxiety in employees: colleagues’ frequent sharing of their good news at work. This may elicit not only anxiety but also contact avoidance in employees, particularly those with a low level of prevention focus. The implications and limitations of the research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvey, R. D., & Ivancevich, J. M. (1980). Punishment in organizations: A review, propositions, and research suggestions. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S., & Beck-Dudley, C. L. (2005). Designing ethical organizations: Avoiding the long-term negative effects of rewards and punishments. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(4), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beehr, T. A., & McGrath, J. E. (1992). Social support, occupational stress and anxiety. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 5(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of crosscultural psychology (pp. 389–444). Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, P. F., & Campion, M. A. (2018). A role–resource approach–avoidance model of job crafting: A multimethod integration and extension of job crafting theory. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 499–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Sills, L., & Barlow, D. H. (2007). Incorporating emotion regulation into conceptualizations and treatments of anxiety and mood disorders. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 542–559). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D., Kacmar, K. M., Zivnuska, S., Ferguson, M., & Whitten, D. (2011). Work-family enrichment and job performance: A constructive replication of affective events theory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(3), 297–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Geng, Z., & Liu, C. (2020a). How supervisor gossip and regulatory focus interact to impact target's proactive/withdrawal behavior. In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2020, no. 1, p. 19333). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.

  • Chen, Y., Zhang, F., Wang, Y., & Zheng, J. (2020b). Work–family conflict, emotional responses, workplace deviance, and well-being among construction professionals: A sequential mediation model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6883.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau Jr., F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., Van Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers’ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 887.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donato, S., Pagani, A., Parise, M., Bertoni, A., & Iafrate, R. (2014). The capitalization process in stable couple relationships: Intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y., Seo, M. G., & Bartol, K. M. (2014). No pain, no gain: An affect-based model of developmental job experience and the buffering effects of emotional intelligence. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1056–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, D., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2020). Capitalization on positive family events and task performance: A perspective from the work–home resources model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. Advance online publication.

  • Eder, A. B., Elliot, A. J., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2013). Approach and avoidance motivation: Issues and advances. Emotion Review, 5, 227–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eissa, G., & Lester, S. W. (2017). Supervisor role overload and frustration as antecedents of abusive supervision: The moderating role of supervisor personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(3), 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., Eder, A. B., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2013). Approach–avoidance motivation and emotion: Convergence and divergence. Emotion Review, 5, 308–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Sherman, R. (2002). Envy, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 953–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. R. (2000). Work–family conflict and employee psychiatric disorders: The national comorbidity survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 888–895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2010). Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 195–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, S. L., Gonzaga, G. C., & Strachman, A. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 904–917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grandey, A. A., Tam, A. P., & Brauburger, A. L. (2002). Affective states and traits in the workplace: Diary and survey data from young workers. Motivation and Emotion, 26(1), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. M., Fuhrer, R., Stansfeld, S. A., & Marmot, M. (2002). The importance of low control at work and home on depression and anxiety: Do these effects vary by gender and social class? Social Science & Medicine, 54(5), 783–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, L., Chiang, J. T. J., Mao, J. Y., & Chien, C. J. (2020). Abuse as a reaction of perfectionistic leaders: A moderated mediation model of leader perfectionism, perceived control, and subordinate feedback seeking on abusive supervision. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(3), 790–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., & Silberman, I. (1998). Development of regulatory focus: Promotion and prevention as ways of living. In J. Heckhausen & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life span (pp. 78–113). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., Chen, Y., & Ye, M. (2021). Eager to belong: Social cyberloafing as a coping response to workplace ostracism. Current Psychology. Advance online publication.

  • Ilies, R., Keeney, J., & Scott, B. A. (2011). Work–family interpersonal capitalization: Sharing positive work events at home. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(2), 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilies, R., Keeney, J., & Goh, Z. W. (2015). Capitalising on positive work events by sharing them at home. Applied Psychology, 64(3), 578–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E., & Youngstrom, E. A. (1996). The activation and regulation of fear and anxiety. In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Perspectives on anxiety, panic, and fear (pp. 1–59). University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. M., Patel, P. C., & Messersmith, J. G. (2013). High-performance work systems and job control: Consequences for anxiety, role overload, and turnover intentions. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1699–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Djurdjevic, E. (2011). Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 744–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. D., Smith, M. B., Wallace, J. C., Hill, A. D., & Baron, R. A. (2015). A review of multilevel regulatory focus in organizations. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1501–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). On the value of aiming high: The causes and consequences of ambition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 758–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karekla, M., Forsyth, J. P., & Kelly, M. M. (2004). Emotional avoidance and panicogenic responding to a biological challenge procedure. Behavior Therapy, 35(4), 725–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korte, S. M., & De Boer, S. F. (2003). A robust animal model of state anxiety: Fear-potentiated behaviour in the elevated plus-maze. European Journal of Pharmacology, 463(1–3), 163–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kouchaki, M., & Desai, S. D. (2015). Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: How anxiety makes individuals feel threatened and commit unethical acts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 360–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46(8), 819–834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 5–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, N., Dolcos, S., Iordan, A. D., Rudolph, K. D., & Dolcos, F. (2013). Reappraisal and suppression mediate the contribution of regulatory focus to anxiety in healthy adults. Emotion, 13(4), 610–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, G., Kingsbury, R., & Shaw, S. (2005). Adding insult to injury: Social pain theory and response to social exclusion. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 77–90). Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(3), 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A. (1990). Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28(6), 455–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matta, F. K., Erol-Korkmaz, H. T., Johnson, R. E., & Biçaksiz, P. (2014). Significant work events and counterproductive work behavior: The role of fairness, emotions, and emotion regulation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 920–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, C. J., & Blumberg, C. J. (1990). The social comparison choices of elementary and secondary school students: The influence of gender, race, and friendship. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(2), 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2017). Mplus user’s guide, eight edition [Computer software manual]. Los Angeles, CA.

  • Nabi, R. L., & Keblusek, L. (2014). Inspired by hope, motivated by envy: Comparing the effects of discrete emotions in the process of social comparison to media figures. Media Psychology, 17(2), 208–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, M. J., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., Chonko, L. B., & Roberts, J. A. (2008). Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nifadkar, S., Tsui, A. S., & Ashforth, B. E. (2012). The way you make me feel and behave: Supervisor-triggered newcomer affect and approach-avoidance behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1146–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. J., Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2018). Making the good even better: A review and theoretical model of interpersonal capitalization. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(7), e12407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, X., Huang, M., Johnson, R. E., Hu, Q., & Ju, D. (2018). The short-lived benefits of abusive supervisory behavior for actors: An investigation of recovery and work engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1951–1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezvani, A., Chang, A., Wiewiora, A., Ashkanasy, N. M., Jordan, P. J., & Zolin, R. (2016). Manager emotional intelligence and project success: The mediating role of job satisfaction and trust. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1112–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodell, J. B., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1438–1451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, K., Putman, P., Schouten, S., Lange, W. G., Volman, I., & Rinck, M. (2010). Gaze direction differentially affects avoidance tendencies to happy and angry faces in socially anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(4), 290–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). The self-consciousness scale: A revised version for use with general populations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(8), 687–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). An experimental approach to anxiety, escape and avoidance behavior. In Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathological Association, 39th, Jun, 1949, New York City, NY, US. Grune & Stratton.

  • Shah, J. Y., Brazy, P. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Promoting us or preventing them: Regulatory focus and manifestations of intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 433–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro Jr., D. H., Schwartz, C. E., & Astin, J. A. (1996). Controlling ourselves, controlling our world: Psychology's role in understanding positive and negative consequences of seeking and gaining control. American Psychologist, 51(12), 1213–1230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shevlin, M. E., & Lewis, C. A. (1999). The revised social anxiety scale: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(2), 250–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smillie, L. D., Yeo, G. B., Furnham, A. F., & Jackson, C. J. (2006). Benefits of all work and no play: The relationship between neuroticism and performance as a function of resource allocation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 139–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 46–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Emotion and adaptation. In L. A. Parvin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 609–637). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1991). Relations of job characteristics from multiple data sources with employee affect, absence, turnover intentions, and health. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 46–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J., & Lockhart, D. (2005). Abused subordinates’ upward maintenance communication: A coping perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the annual meeting of the southern management association. Charleston, .

  • Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., Lockhart, D. E., & Carr, J. C. (2007). Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates’ psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1169–1180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A. (2000). On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(4), 290–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2009). Leveling up and down: The experiences of benign and malicious envy. Emotion, 9(3), 419–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vidyarthi, P. R., Liden, R. C., Anand, S., Erdogan, B., & Ghosh, S. (2010). Where do I stand? Examining the effects of leader–member exchange social comparison on employee work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 849–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. T., Barnes, C. M., & Scott, B. A. (2014). Driving it home: How workplace emotional labor harms employee home life. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 487–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. C., Johnson, P. D., & Frazier, M. L. (2009). An examination of the factorial, construct, and predictive validity and utility of the regulatory focus at work scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(6), 805–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, T. (2020). Workplace interpersonal capitalization: Employee reactions to coworker positive event disclosures. Academy of Management Journal. Advance online publication.

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 1–74). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. H., & Lin, Y. C. (2005). Development of a Zhong-Yong thinking style scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 24, 247–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagil, D., Ben-Zur, H., & Tamir, I. (2011). Do employees cope effectively with abusive supervision at work? An exploratory study. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, L., & Duffy, M. K. (2021). The whiplash effect: The (moderating) role of attributed motives in emotional and behavioral reactions to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology. Advance online publication.

  • Zhang, Y., Liu, X., & Chen, W. (2020). Fight and flight: A contingency model of third parties’ approach-avoidance reactions to peer abusive supervision. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35, 767–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zvolensky, M. J., & Forsyth, J. P. (2002). Anxiety sensitivity dimensions in the prediction of body vigilance and emotional avoidance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(4), 449–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the grants funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 31970990).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

    Jiamin Li, Yunyang Hu & Maolin Ye

Authors
  1. Jiamin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yunyang Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maolin Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maolin Ye.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for Publication

The participant has consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Hu, Y. & Ye, M. “If you keep talking, I’ll leave”: The impact of workplace interpersonal capitalization on contact avoidance. Curr Psychol 42, 12582–12593 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02440-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02440-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation