Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Person–organization fit and helping behavior: How and when this relationship occurs

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Helping behaviors are vital for organizational effectiveness in highly changing and interdependent contexts, such as young, knowledge-intensive SMEs (small and medium enterprises). Therefore, the research on the conditions under which such behavior is promoted is of great importance. In this sense, this paper examined how and when the person–organization fit (PO fit) (i.e., perceived value congruence) influenced the employees’ helping behavior in a sample of 320 employees and their supervisors from 21 knowledge-intensive SMEs in Spain. Results indicated that job engagement was a key mechanism that transmitted the effect of PO fit on employees’ helping behavior. In addition, the level of perceived organizational support (POS) moderated the relationship between person–organization fit and job engagement. Thus, when employees did not feel supported by their organization, their agreement with the values of the organization did not lead them to greater job engagement. Finally, results showed that the indirect relationship between PO fit and helping behavior, through job engagement, was not significant when employees discerned a low level of POS. Important implications are derived from these findings from both a theoretical and practical point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Alfes, K., Shantz, A., & Alahakone, R. (2016). Testing additive versus interactive effects of person-organization fit and organizational trust on engagement and performance. Personnel Review, 45(6), 1323–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2017). The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.

  • Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Columbia University Press.

  • Biswas, S., & Bhatnagar, J. (2013). Mediator analysis of employee engagement: Role of perceived organizational support, P-O fit, organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 38(1), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875–884.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822–834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaburu, D. S., Chakrabarty, S., Wang, J., & Li, N. (2015). Organizational support and citizenship behaviors: A comparative cross-cultural meta-analysis. Management International Review, 55(5), 707–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, E. R., Rich, B. L., Buckman, B., & Bergeron, J. (2014). The antecedents and drivers of employee engagement. In C. Truss, R. Delbridge, K. Alfes, A. Shantz, & E. Soane (Eds.), Employee engagement in theory and practice (pp. 57–81). Routledge.

  • Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, M. G. (2018). Helping in organizations: A review and directions for future research. In Philip M. Podsakoff, S. B. Mackenzie, & N. P. Podsakoff (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Citizenship Behavior (pp. 475–505). Oxford University Press.

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldor, L., & Harpaz, I. (2016). A process model of employee engagement: The learning climate and its relationship with extra-role performance behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2004). Work value congruence and intrinsic career success. Personnel Psychology, 57(2), 305–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, M. L., & Tupper, C. (2018). Supervisor prosocial motivation, employee thriving, and helping behavior: A trickle-down model of psychological safety. Group and Organization Management, 43(4), 561–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165. 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Patil, S. V. (2012). Challenging the norm of self-interest: Minority influence and transitions to helping norms in work units. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 547–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodal, S., Nelson, A. J., & Siino, R. M. (2015). Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 136–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. Y. A., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

  • Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2005). How dentists cope with their job demands and stay engaged: The moderating role of job resources. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 113(6), 479–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harari, M. B., Reaves, A. C., & Viswesvaran, C. (2016). Creative and innovative performance: A meta-analysis of relationships with task, citizenship, and counterproductive job performance dimensions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(4), 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17, 484–500.

  • Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2010). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 389–399.

  • Hofstede. (2019). Country comparison - Hofstede Insights. Retrieved January 29, 2021, from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/spain,the-usa/.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45(4), 321–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kark, R., & Waismel-Manor, R. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: What’s gender got to do with it? Organization, 12(6), 889–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiazad, K., Seibert, S. E., & Kraimer, M. L. (2014). Psychological contract breach and employee innovation: A conservation of resources perspective. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 87(3), 535–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, D. L. (2002). The influence of gender on the performance of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 28(5), 629–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, S.-H., Choi, Y., Rhee, S.-Y., & Moon, T. (2018). Social capital and organizational citizenship behavior: Double-mediation of emotional regulation and job engagement. Sustainability, 10(10), 3600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, T. N., & Scullion, H. (2017). Talent management and dynamic view of talent in small and medium enterprises. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 431–441.

  • Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof-Brown, A. L., Li, C. S., & Schneider, B. (2018). Fitting in and doing good: A review of person-environment fit and organizational citizenship behavior research. In P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. Mackenzie, & N. P. Podsakoff (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational citizenship behavior (pp. 353–370). Oxford University Press.

  • Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, M. P., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Work engagement: Introduction. In A. B. Bakker & M.-P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 1–9). Psychology Press.

  • Lemmon, G., & Wayne, S. J. (2015). Underlying motives of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing egoistic and altruistic motivations. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 22(2), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Koopman, J., & Conlon, D. E. (2015). Does seeing “eye to eye” affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on lmx agreement. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1686–1708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, A., Brattström, A., & Wennberg, K. (2017). How young firms achieve growth: Reconciling the roles of growth motivation and innovative activities. Small Business Economics, 49(2), 273–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messersmith, J. G., & Guthrie, J. P. (2010). High performance work systems in emergent organizations: Implications for firm performance. Human Resource Management, 49(2), 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messersmith, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance in young firms: The role of human resource management. International Small Business Journal, 31(2), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the Employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543–1567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, D. W., & LePine, J. A. (2018). Organizational citizenship behavior and job engagement: “You gotta keep ‘em separated!”. In P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. Mackenzie, & N. P. Podsakoff (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational citizenship behavior (pp. 43–54). Oxford University Press.

  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. Y., & Van Dyne, L. (2005). Antecedents and performance consequences of helping behavior in work groups: A multilevel analysis. Group & Organization Management, 30(5), 514–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oo, E., Jung, H., & Park, I.-J. (2018). Psychological factors linking perceived CSR to OCB: The role of organizational pride, collectivism, and person–organization fit. Sustainability, 10(7), 2481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Vonortas, N. S. (2017). Determinants of young firms’ innovative performance: Empirical evidence from Europe. Research Policy, 46(7), 1312–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psychogios, A., Nyfoudi, M., Theodorakopoulos, N., Szamosi, L. T., & Prouska, R. (2019). Many hands lighter work? Deciphering the relationship between adverse working conditions and organization citizenship Behaviours in small and medium-sized enterprises during a severe economic crisis. British Journal of Management, 30(3), 519–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raja, U., Bouckenooghe, D., Syed, F., & Naseer, S. (2018). Interplay between P-O fit, transformational leadership and organizational social capital. Personnel Review, 47(4), 913–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., & Hatak, I. (2016). A meta-analysis of different HR-enhancing practices and performance of small and medium sized firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), 485–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2011). Getting newcomers engaged: The role of socialization tactics. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(5), 383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Goldstiein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 747–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior. Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. P., Leuty, M. E., Rayburn, R., & Wu, B. H. (2019). Person–environment fit at work: Relationships with workplace behaviours. Australian Journal of Career Development, 28(3), 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straatmann, T., Königschulte, S., Hattrup, K., & Hamborg, K. C. (2020). Analysing mediating effects underlying the relationships between P–O fit, P–J fit, and organisational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1533–1559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, T. D., & Deosthali, K. (2014). Analysis of self-reported motives for task-related helping: Implications for an integrated theory of helping. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(3), 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teh, P. L., & Yong, C. C. (2011). Knowledge sharing in is personnel: Organizational behavior’s perspective. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(4), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2015). Job crafting and job performance: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 914–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, H. H. M., To, M. L., & Chiu, W. C. K. (2018). When and why does transformational leadership influence employee creativity? The roles of personal control and creative personality. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uçanok, B., & Karabatı, S. (2013). The effects of values, work centrality, and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behaviors: Evidence from Turkish SMEs. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 24(1), 89–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, R. M., & Feldman, D. C. (2009). Integrating the levels of person-environment fit: The roles of vocational fit and group fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(1), 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. C. (2013). Person-organization fit and organizational citizenship behavior: Time perspective. Journal of Management and Organization, 19, pp. 101–114. Cambridge University Press.

  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xerri, M. J., & Brunetto, Y. (2013). Fostering innovative behaviour: The importance of employee commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(16), 3163–3177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L. D. (2012). How to promote innovative behavior at work? The role of justice and support within organizations. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 220–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D., & Vormann, C. (2009). Personnel selection criteria in IT ventures: A policy-capturing analysis. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 79(2), 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics and Business Studies, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Avda. do Burgo, s/n, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    Guadalupe Vila-Vázquez, Carmen Castro-Casal & Dolores Álvarez-Pérez

Authors
  1. Guadalupe Vila-Vázquez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carmen Castro-Casal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dolores Álvarez-Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guadalupe Vila-Vázquez or Carmen Castro-Casal.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

The procedures involving human participation were developed with rigor and integrity.

Informed Consent

Participation in the study was voluntary. By responding to the online questionnaire, participants gave consent to the use of the data for academic purposes.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vila-Vázquez, G., Castro-Casal, C. & Álvarez-Pérez, D. Person–organization fit and helping behavior: How and when this relationship occurs. Curr Psychol 42, 3701–3712 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01708-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01708-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation