This study examined whether the teacher-student relationship (TSR) served as a protective factor for students from families of lower socioeconomic status (SES). It was based on data from a standard mathematics assessment and survey using student and teacher questionnaires that were developed by the Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality (CICA-BEQ) in China in 2016, which included 8707 fourth-grade Chinese students nested within 164 classes. We used multilevel structural equation models (MSEM) to investigate the mediating role of self-efficacy in mathematics in the relationship between SES and mathematics achievement and the moderating role of TSR in the direct and indirect relationship between SES and mathematics achievement at both the student-level and the class-level. The results suggested that the effect of SES on mathematics achievement was mediated by academic self-efficacy in mathematics both at the student-level and the class-level. The results also demonstrated a significant interaction between TSR and SES for self-efficacy both at the student-level and the class-level. Additionally, statistics indicated that TSR moderated the indirect relationship between SES and achievement via academic self-efficacy in mathematics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality.
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1982). Attachment: Retrospect and prospect. In C. M. Parker & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), The place of attachment in human behavior (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.
Baker, J. A. (1999). Teacher-student interaction in urban at-risk classrooms: Differential behavior, relationship quality, and student satisfaction with school. Elementary School Journal, 100(1), 57–70.
Baker, J. A. (2006). Contributions of teacher-child relationships to positive school adjustment during elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 44(3), 211–229.
Baker, J. A., Grant, S., & Morlock, L. (2008). The teacher-student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 3–15.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewoods Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729–735.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
Bandura, A. (2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management (pp. 9–35). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38, 9–44.
Barile, J. P., Donohue, D. K., Anthony, E. R., Baker, A. M., Weaver, S. R., & Henrich, C. C. (2012). Teacher–student relationship climate and school outcomes: Implications for educational policy initiatives. Journal of Youth & Adolescence,41(3), 256-267.
Berk, L.E. (2000). Child Development (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children's early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 61–79.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects. American Psychologist, 34(10), 844–850.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 1643–1647). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U.(2009). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard university press. Retrieved from: http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~siegler/35bronfebrenner94.pdf
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993–1028). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc..
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473–490.
Carew, J. V., & Lightfoot, S. L. (1979). Beyond bias: Perspectives on classrooms. Mass: Harvard University Press.
Chang, D., & Chien, W. C. (2015). Determining the relationship between academic self-efficacy and student engagement by meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 2015 international conference on education reform and modern management, Hong Kong.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Erlbaum.
Coleman, P. K., & Karraker, K. H. (1998). Self-efficacy and parenting quality: Findings and future applications. Developmental Review, 18(1), 47–85.
Cooke, A., Cavanagh, R., Hurst, C., & Sparrow, L. (2011). Situational effects of mathematics anxiety in pre-service teacher education. In AARE 2011 Conference proceedings. Australian Association for Research in Education.
Doerschuk, P., Bahrim, C., Daniel, J., Kruger, J., Mann, J., & Martin, C. (2016). Closing the gaps and filling the STEM pipeline: A multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 682–695.
Ernest, P. (2013). Philosophy mathematics Educ. Routledge.
Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). The effect of household wealth on educational attainment: Evidence from 35 countries. Population and Development Review, 25(1), 85–120.
Gecas, V. (1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 291–316.
Gecas, V., & Schwalbe, M. L. (1983). Beyond the looking-glass self: Social structure and efficacy-based self-esteem. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(2), 77–88.
Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1997). Looking in classrooms (7th ed.). New York: Longman.
Hajovsky, D. B., Chesnut, S. R., & Jensen, K. M. (2020). The role of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs in the development of teacher-student relationships. Journal of School Psychology, 82, 141–158.
Hajovsky, D. B., Mason, B. A., & McCune, L. A. (2017). Teacher-student relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: A longitudinal examination of gender differences. Journal of School Psychology, 63(4), 119–133.
Halford, G. S., Andrews, G., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (2012). Computational models of relational processes in cognitive development. Cognitive Development, 27(4), 481–499.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76(5), 949–967.
Hecht, S. A., & Greenfield, D. B. (2001). Comparing the predictive validity of first grade teacher ratings and Reading-related tests on third grade levels of Reading skills in young children exposed to poverty. School Psychology Review, 30(1), 50–69.
Hoskovcová, S. H. (2006). Self-efficacy in preschool children. Studia Psychologica, 48(2), 175–182.
Hox, J. J., & Maas, C. J. (2001). The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(2), 157–174.
Hughes, J. N. (2013). Teacher-student relationships and school adjustment: Progress and remaining challenges. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672288.
Hughes, J. N., Wu, J. Y., Kwok, O. M., Villarreal, V., & Johnson, A. Y. (2012). Indirect effects of child reports of teacher-student relationship on achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 350–365.
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525.
Jerome, E. M., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2009). Teacher-child relationships from kindergarten to sixth grade: Early childhood predictors of teacher-perceived conflict and closeness. Social Development, 18(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00508.x.
Kalter, N., Alpern, D., Spence, R., & Plunkett, J. W. (1984). Locus of control in children of divorce. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(4), 410–414.
Khalilzadeh, S., & Khodi, A. (2018). Teachers’ personality traits and students’ motivation: A structural equation modeling analysis. Current Psychology, 1–16.
Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67–72.
Lam, A. C., Ruzek, E. A., Schenke, K., Conley, A. M., & Karabenick, S. A. (2015). Student perceptions of classroom achievement goal structure: Is it appropriate to aggregate? Journal of Educational Psychology., 107(4), 1102–1115. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000028.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Gore, P. A. (1997). Discriminant and predictive validity of academic self-concept, academic self-efficacy, and mathematics-specific self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(3), 307–315.
Li, C. (2005). Prestige stratification in the contemporary China: Occupational prestige measures and socio-economic index. Sociological Research, 2, 74–102.
Li, H., Liu, J., Zhang, D., & Liu, H. (2021). Examining the relationships between cognitive activation, self-efficacy, socioeconomic status, and achievement in mathematics: A multi-level analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 101–126.
Liu, Y., Li, X., Chen, L., & Qu, Z. (2015). Perceived positive teacher-student relationship as a protective factor for Chinese left-behind children’s emotional and behavioural adjustment. International Journal of Psychology, 50(5), 354–362.
Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80–89.
Ma, X. (2000). Socioeconomic gaps in academic achievement within schools: Are they consistent across subject areas? Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(4), 337–355.
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Marks, G. N. (2017). Is SES really that important for educational outcomes in Australia? A review and some recent evidence. Australian Educational Researcher, 44(2), 191–211.
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 764–802.
Marsh, H. W., & Seaton, M. (2013). Academic self-concept. In J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. International guide to student achievement (pp. 62–63). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group: New York.
Mason, B. A., Hajovsky, D. B., Mccune, L. A., & Turek, J. J. (2017). Conflict, closeness, and academic skills: A longitudinal examination of the teacher–student relationship. School Psychology Review, 46(2), 177–189.
McConney, A., & Perry, L. B. (2010). Science and mathematics achievement in Australia: The role of school socioeconomic composition in educational equity and effectiveness. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 429–452.
McCormick, M. P., O'Connor, E. E., Cappella, E., & McClowry, S. G. (2013). Teacher-child relationships and academic achievement: A multilevel propensity score model approach. Journal of School Psychology, 51(5), 611–624.
McNeish, D. (2017). Multilevel mediation with small samples: A cautionary note on the multilevel structural equation modeling framework. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(4), 609–625.
McNeish, D. M., & Stapleton, L. M. (2016). The effect of small sample size on two-level model estimates: A review and illustration. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 295–314.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2011). 义务教育数学课程标准(2011年版) [Compulsory education mathematics curriculum standards (2011 ed.)]. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University.
Mojavezi, A., & Tamiz, M. P. (2012). The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the Students' motivation and achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 483–491.
Muller, C., Katz, S. R., & Dance, L. J. (1999). Investing in teaching and learning: Dynamics of the teacher-student relationship from each actor’s perspective. Urban Education, 34(3), 292–337.
Murray, C., & Malmgren, K. (2005). Implementing a teacher-student relationship program in a high-poverty urban school: Effects on social, emotional, and academic adjustment and lessons learned. Journal of School Psychology, 43(2), 137–152.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
Nelson, P. M., & Christ, T. J. (2016). Reliability and agreement in student ratings of the class environment. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(3), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000127.
O’Connor, E. E., Dearing, E., & Collins, B. A. (2011). Teacher-child relationship and behavior problem trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 120–162.
Okpala, C. O., Okpala, A. O., & Smith, F. E. (2001). Parental involvement, instructional expenditures, family socioeconomic attributes, and student achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(2), 110–115.
Okpala, C. O., Smith, F., Jones, E., & Ellis, R. (2000). A clear link between school and teacher characteristics, student demographics, and student achievement. (statistical data included). Education, 120(3), 487–494.
Perry, L. B., & McConney, A. (2010). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1137–1162.
Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. (1992). Teacher-child relationships and the process of adjusting to school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1992(57), 61–80.
Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. B. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children's classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 7(2), 295–312.
Pickens, T. (2010). Personal or professional? Reflecting on teacher-student relationship. Journal of Classroom Teaching & Learning, March 10. Retrieved from http://joctl.blogspot.com/2010/03/personal-or-professionalreflecting-on.html
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel sem framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233.
Reardon, S. F., Greenberg, E. H., Kalogrides, D., Shores, K. A., & Valentino, R. A. (2013). Left Behind? The Effect of No Child Left Behind on Academic Achievement Gaps. Unpublished manuscript.
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Larsen, R. A., Baroody, A. E., Curby, T. W., Ko, M., Thomas, J. B., et al. (2014). Efficacy of the responsive classroom approach: Results from a 3-year, longitudinal randomized controlled trial. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 567–603.
Rist, R. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 40(3), 411–451.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529.
Semeraro, C., Giofrè, D., Coppola, G., Lucangeli, D., & Cassibba, R. (2020). The role of cognitive and non-cognitive factors in mathematics achievement: The importance of the quality of the student-teacher relationship in middle school. PLoS One, 15(4), e0231381.
Schmidt, W., Burroughs, N., Zoido, P., & Houang, R. (2015). The role of schooling in perpetuating educational inequality: An international perspective. Educational Researcher, 44(7), 371–386.
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 207–231.
Schunk, D. H. (2001, August). Self-regulation through goal setting. ERIC Digests, 2001, Article CG-01-08. Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/2002-4/goal.html
Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C., & Bruning, R. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 91–100.
Silver, R. B., Measelle, J. R., Armstrong, J. M., & Essex, M. J. (2005). Trajectories of classroom externalizing behavior: Contributions of child characteristics, family characteristics, and the teacher-child relationship during the school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 43(1), 39–60.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
Stockard, J., & Mayberry, M. (1992). Effective educational environments. Newbury Park: Corwin Press.
Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Underwood, C. (2017). PISA 2015: Reporting Australia’s results. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Toste, J. R., Heath, N., & Dallaire, L. (2010). Perceptions of classroom working alliance and student performance. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 56(4), 371–387.
Tymms, P., Merrell, C., & Henderson, B. (1997). The first year at school: A quantitative investigation of the attainment and progress of pupils. Educational Research and Evaluation, 3(2), 101–118.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 30–43.
Wentzel, K. R. (2003). Sociometric status and adjustment in middle school: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 5–28.
Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26(1–2), 27–47.
Wood, R. E., & Locke, E. A. (1987). The relation of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47(4), 1013–1024.
Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods,12(4), 695-719.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. Self-efficacy in changing societies, 202-231.
The collection of the data used in the present study was funded by the Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment Toward Basic Education Quality (CICA-BEQ) at Beijing Normal University.
This article is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071091);
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The study was reviewed and approved by the research committee in Beijing Normal University, as well as by the committee in local government. All subjects and their parents were provided with written informed consent.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, H., Liu, Q., Du, X. et al. Teacher-student relationship as a protective factor for socioeconomic status, students’ self-efficacy and achievement: a multilevel moderated mediation analysis. Curr Psychol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01598-7
- Academic self-efficacy in mathematics
- Mathematics achievement
- Socioeconomic status
- Teacher-student relationship