Antisocial and Prosocial online behaviour: Exploring the roles of the Dark and Light Triads

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

  2. 2.

    Single regression models can be seen in Online Resource 1

  3. 3.

    Further reliability analyses can be seen in Online Resource 2


  1. Balakrishnan, V., Khan, S., & Arabnia, H. R. (2020). Improving cyberbullying detection using twitter users’ psychological features and machine learning. Computers & Security, 90, 101710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dinić, B. M., & Jevremov, T. (2019). Trends in research related to the dark triad: A bibliometric analysis. Current Psychology, 1-10.

  3. Ferenczi, N., Marshall, T. C., & Bejanyan, K. (2017). Are sex differences in antisocial and prosocial Facebook use explained by narcissism and relational self-construal? Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grieve, R., & March, E. (2020). Just checking: Vulnerable and grandiose narcissism subtypes as predictors of phubbing. Mobile Media & Communication.

  5. Guo, Q., Sun, P., & Li, L. (2018). Shyness and online prosocial behavior: A study on multiple mediation mechanisms. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufman, S. B., Yaden, D. B., Hyde, E., & Tsukayama, E. (2019). The Light vs. Dark Triad of personality: Contrasting two very different profiles of human nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 467.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. March, E. (2019). Psychopathy, sadism, empathy, and the motivation to cause harm: New evidence confirms malevolent nature of the internet troll. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 133–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. March, E., Litten, V., Sullivan, D. H., & Ward, L. (2020). Somebody that I (used to) know: Gender and dimensions of dark personality traits as predictors of intimate partner cyberstalking. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 110084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moor, L., & Anderson, J. R. (2019). A systematic literature review of the relationship between dark personality traits and antisocial online behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Palmer, J. A., & Tackett, S. (2018). An examination of the dark triad constructs with regard to Prosocial behavior. Acta Psychopathologica, 4,

  12. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Safaria, T., Nuqul, F. L., Purwandari, E., Ratnaningsih, I. Z., Khairania, M., Saputra, N., et al. (2020). The role of dark triad personality on cyberbullying: Is it still a problem? International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(2), 4256–4260.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sevi, B., Urganci, B., & Sakman, E. (2020). Who cheats? An examination of light and dark personality traits as predictors of infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 164, 110126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, C., & Wang, C. (2008). Helping others in online games: Prosocial behavior in cyberspace. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 11, 344–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wertag, A., & Bratko, D. (2019). In search of the prosocial personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 40, 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evita March.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Federation University Australia Human Research Ethics Committee. We certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information


(DOCX 22 kb)


(DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

March, E., Marrington, J.Z. Antisocial and Prosocial online behaviour: Exploring the roles of the Dark and Light Triads. Curr Psychol (2021).

Download citation