This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Notes
References
Balakrishnan, V., Khan, S., & Arabnia, H. R. (2020). Improving cyberbullying detection using twitter users’ psychological features and machine learning. Computers & Security, 90, 101710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.101710.
Dinić, B. M., & Jevremov, T. (2019). Trends in research related to the dark triad: A bibliometric analysis. Current Psychology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00250-9.
Ferenczi, N., Marshall, T. C., & Bejanyan, K. (2017). Are sex differences in antisocial and prosocial Facebook use explained by narcissism and relational self-construal? Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.033.
Grieve, R., & March, E. (2020). Just checking: Vulnerable and grandiose narcissism subtypes as predictors of phubbing. Mobile Media & Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920942276.
Guo, Q., Sun, P., & Li, L. (2018). Shyness and online prosocial behavior: A study on multiple mediation mechanisms. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.032.
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105.
Kaufman, S. B., Yaden, D. B., Hyde, E., & Tsukayama, E. (2019). The Light vs. Dark Triad of personality: Contrasting two very different profiles of human nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00467.
March, E. (2019). Psychopathy, sadism, empathy, and the motivation to cause harm: New evidence confirms malevolent nature of the internet troll. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.001.
March, E., Litten, V., Sullivan, D. H., & Ward, L. (2020). Somebody that I (used to) know: Gender and dimensions of dark personality traits as predictors of intimate partner cyberstalking. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 110084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110084.
Moor, L., & Anderson, J. R. (2019). A systematic literature review of the relationship between dark personality traits and antisocial online behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.027.
Palmer, J. A., & Tackett, S. (2018). An examination of the dark triad constructs with regard to Prosocial behavior. Acta Psychopathologica, 4, https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-6676.100161.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6.
Safaria, T., Nuqul, F. L., Purwandari, E., Ratnaningsih, I. Z., Khairania, M., Saputra, N., et al. (2020). The role of dark triad personality on cyberbullying: Is it still a problem? International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(2), 4256–4260.
Sevi, B., Urganci, B., & Sakman, E. (2020). Who cheats? An examination of light and dark personality traits as predictors of infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 164, 110126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110126.
Wang, C., & Wang, C. (2008). Helping others in online games: Prosocial behavior in cyberspace. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 11, 344–346. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0045.
Wertag, A., & Bratko, D. (2019). In search of the prosocial personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 40, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Statement
The study was approved by the Federation University Australia Human Research Ethics Committee. We certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
March, E., Marrington, J.Z. Antisocial and Prosocial online behaviour: Exploring the roles of the Dark and Light Triads. Curr Psychol 42, 1390–1393 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01552-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01552-7