Skip to main content
Log in

Translated article: Family belonging scale: A scale development study

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 31 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop an instrument to measure individuals’ sense of belonging to a family. A five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 17 items, which represents the sense of belonging to a family, was obtained. The scale was administered to 1579 university students from different universities in Konya. Before the principal component analysis, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s tests were performed to assess the suitability of the data for factor analysis. As a result of these tests, the KMO value was found to be .96 and Bartlett’s test for sphericity value was found to be significant at 16943.875 (p < .001). As a result of the factor analysis and varimax rotation, it was determined that the scale had a two-factor structure (family belonging and self-belonging) explaining 60% of the total variance. The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) of the scale was calculated as .94. The data were then recollected, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the data from 1500 individuals. Confirmatory factor analysis determined that the tool, entitled the Family Belonging Scale (FBS), produced expected values and is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in all kinds of services concerning for families, especially in family counseling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Change history

References

  • Bulut, I. (1990). Aile Değerlendirme Ölçeği el kitabı. Ankara: Özgüzeliş Matbaası.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için very analizi el kitabı (2. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choenarom, C., Williams, R. A., & Hagerty, B. M. (2005). The role of sense of belonging and social support on stres and depression in individuals with depression. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 19(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2004.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duru, E. (2007). Sosyal bağlılık ölçeği’nin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 26, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ersanlı, K., & Koçyiğit, M. (2013). Ait olma ölçeği’nin psikometrik özellikleri. Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(12), 751–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, B. M., Lynch-Sauer, J., Patusky, K., Bouwsema, M., & Collier, P. (1992). Sense of belonging: A vital mental health concept. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 6, 172–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, B. M., & Patusky, K. L. (1995). Developing a measure of sense of belonging. Nursing Research, 44, 9–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, B. M., & Williams, R. A. (1999). The effect of sense of belonging, social support, conflict, and loneliness on depression. Nursing Research, 48, 215–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, B. M., Williams, R. A., Coyne, J. C., & Early, M. R. (1996). Sense of belonging and indicators of social and psychological functioning. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 10, 235–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshmand, L. (2006). Culture and the field of psychotherapy and counseling. In L. Hoshmand (Ed.), Culture, psychotherapy, and counseling: Critical and integrative perspectives (pp. 25–47). Thousand oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaner, S. (2003). Aile destek ölçeği: Faktör yapısı, güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışmaları. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepore, S., Evans, G., & Schneider, M. (1991). Dynamic role of social support in the link between chronic stress and psychological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 899–909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavili Aktaş, A. (2011). Ben ve ailem. Konya: Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavili Aktaş, A. (2014). Aile danışmanlığı eğitimi ve etik ilkeler. Ankara: VII Aile Şurası Bildiriler Kitabı.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, B. H. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M. J. (1990). SPSS base system user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayar, K. (2012). Terapi: Kültürel birleştiri. İstanbul: Timaş.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorias, O. (1988). Sosyal desteğin değerlendirilmesi II: Toplumdan seçilmiş örneklemde sosyal ağın yapısal özellikleri ile algılanan destek. E.Ü. Edebiyat Fakültesi Psikoloji Seminer Dergisi, 6, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovar, E., & Simon, M. A. (2010). Factorial structure and invariance analysis of the sense of belonging scales. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(3), 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuzcuoğlu, S. (1994). Aile birimlerinin yapısını tanıma ve aile terapisi. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(1), 154–155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nur Feyzal Kesen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Selçuk University. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is a translation of a publication in Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mavili, A., Kesen, N.F. & Daşbaş, S. Translated article: Family belonging scale: A scale development study. Curr Psychol 42, 1337–1344 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01545-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01545-6

Keywords

Navigation