Abstract
The effects of intimate partner violence (IPV) impact victims more negatively than perpetrators. However, as current intervention programs do not provide satisfactory solutions to the problem, there is a growing need for interventions based on novel approaches. In this study, the relationships between proximal antecedents, violence victimization, coping, and psychological symptoms were examined, focusing on the “hot moment” of IPV. The study sample consisted of 205 married women who were victims of IPV. Data were collected using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale, the Proximal Antecedents to Violent Episodes—Victim Form, the Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index, the Brief Symptom Inventory, the Personality Belief Questionnaire–Short Form, the Two Dimension Social Desirability Scale, and a demographics form. The results revealed that proximal antecedents concerning interaction disagreements significantly predicted both IPV and psychological symptoms after controlling for pathological personality beliefs. They positively preceded violence via interactions with post hoc planned coping strategies. The results also revealed that the temporal conceptualization of coping should occur before IPV following the occurrence of proximal antecedents, offering a new look at the victimization process. This perspective provides a delicate synthesis of event-based behaviorist perspectives of IPV explanations and survivor theory for coping with IPV.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Notes
The average family income of a comparable four-person family is 6104.54 TL in Turkey according to 2014 statistics (TÜİK, n.d.).
The results of the study beyond the realm of these hypotheses are not presented here. If required, please contact the first author for a detailed report.
References
Aba, Y., & Kulakaç, Ö. (2016). Çatışmaların Çözümüne Yaklaşım Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Validity and reliability study]. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi [Medical Journal of Bakırköy], 12(1), 33–43.
Akın, A. (2010). İki Boyutlu Sosyal İstenirlik Ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özelliklerinin araştırılması [Two-Dimensional Social Desirability Scale: The study of validity and reliability]. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Gazi University Faculty of Education Journal], 30(3), 771–784.
Babcock, J. C., Costa, D. M., Green, C. E., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2004a). What situations induce intimate partner violence? A reliability and validity study of the proximal antecedents to violent episodes (PAVE) scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(3), 433–442.
Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004b). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1023–1053.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 346–361.
Butler, A. C., Beck, A. T., & Cohen, L. H. (2007). The personality belief questionnaire-short form: Development and preliminary findings. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31(3), 357–370.
Byun, S. (2012). What happens before intimate partner violence? Distal and proximal antecedents. Journal of Family Violence, 27(8), 783–799.
Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359, 1331–1336.
Chang, J. C., Dado, D., Hawker, L., Cluss, P. A., Buranosky, R., Slagel, L., McNeil, M., & Scholle, S. H. (2010). Understanding turning points in intimate partner violence: Factors and circumstances leading women victims towards change. Journal of Women’s Health, 19(2), 251–259.
Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., & Smith, P. H. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 260–268.
Cook, S. L., & Goodman, L. A. (2006). Beyond frequency and severity: Development and validation of the brief coercion and conflict scales. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1050–1072.
DePierro, J., D’Andrea, W., & Pole, N. (2013). Attention biases in female survivors of chronic interpersonal violence: Relationship to trauma-related symptoms and physiology. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4(1), 19135.
Derogatis, L. R. (1993). The brief symptom inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Services.
DeWall, C. N., Finkel, E. J., Lambert, N. M., Slotter, E. B., Bodenhausen, G. V., Pond Jr., R. S., et al. (2013). The voodoo doll task: Introducing and validating a novel method for studying aggressive inclinations. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 419–439.
Dutton, D. G. (1995). The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Dutton, M. A., Green, B. L., Kaltman, S. I., Roesch, D. M., Zeffiro, T. A., & Krause, E. D. (2006). Intimate partner violence, PTSD, and adverse health outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(7), 955–968.
Eisikovits, Z. (1996). The aftermath of wife beating: Strategies of bounding violent events. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(4), 459–474.
Fastame, M. C., Penna, M. P., & Hitchcott, P. K. (2015). Life satisfaction and social desirability across the late life span: What relationship? Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 241–244.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
Flynn, A., & Graham, K. (2010). “Why did it happen?” a review and conceptual framework for research on perpetrators’ and victims’ explanations for intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 239–251.
Gondolf, E. W., & Fisher, E. R. (1988). Battered women as survivors. An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Toronto: Lexington Books.
Goodman, L., Dutton, M. A., Weinfurt, K., & Cook, S. (2003). The intimate partner violence strategies index: Development and application. Violence Against Women, 9, 163–186.
Goodman, L. A., Smyth, K. F., Borges, A. M., & Singer, R. (2009). When crises collide: How intimate partner violence and poverty intersect to shape women’s mental health and coping? Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(4), 306–329.
Hamby, S. (2009). The gender debate about intimate partner violence: Solutions and dead ends. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(1), 24–34.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). NY: Guilford Press.
Heaney, C. A., & Israel, B. A. (2008). Social networks and social support. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (4th ed., pp. 189–210). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Joenssen, D. W., & Bankhofer, U. (2012, July). Hot deck methods for imputing missing data. In International workshop on machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition (pp. 63–75). Berlin: Springer.
Kahya, Y. (2018). Intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration in a Turkish female sample: Rejection sensitivity and hostility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. 088626051878649.
Kahya, Y., & Taşkale, N. (2019). The difficulties in emotion regulation, separation anxiety and impulsivity as predictors of women’s intimate partner violence experiences. Dusunen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 32, 101–112.
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476–499.
Kendall-Tackett, K. (2009). Psychological trauma and physical health: A psychoneuroimmunology approach to etiology of negative health effects and possible interventions. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(1), 35–48.
Klem, L. (2000). Structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 227–260). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kormos, C., & Gifford, R. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371.
Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Kumcağız, H., & Dadashzadeh, R. (2017). Attitudes and correlates of Turkish college students in relation to female honour. Journal of Education Practice, 8(4), 121–128.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
Lewis, C. S., Griffing, S., Chu, M., Jospitre, T., Sage, R. E., Madry, L., & Primm, B. J. (2006). Coping and violence exposure as predictors of psychological functioning in domestic violence survivors. Violence Against Women, 12(4), 340–354.
Loeys, T., Cook, W., De Smet, O., Wietzker, A., & Buysse, A. (2014). The actor-partner interdependence model for categorical data: A user friendly guide to GEE. Personal Relationships, 21, 225–241.
Melton, H. C., & Belknap, J. (2003). He hits, she hits: Assessing gender differences and similarities in officially reported intimate partner violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(3), 328–348.
Miller, L. E., Howell, K. H., & Graham-Bermann, S. A. (2014). The effect of an evidence-based intervention on women’s exposure to intimate partner violence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84(4), 321–328.
Mkandawire-Valhmu, L., Bauer, W. S., Stevens, P. E., Galvao, L. W., Grande, K. M., Yerges, A., Emer, L., Mwenyekonde, T., & Weinhardt, L. (2016). Rural Malawian women’s resistance to systematic oppression, violence, and abuse by their husbands. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(1–2), 268–293.
Riggs, D. S., Caulfield, M. B., & Street, A. E. (2000). Risk for domestic violence: Factors associated with perpetration and victimization. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(10), 1289–1316.
Spencer, C. M., Stith, S. M., & Cafferky, B. (2019). Risk markers for physical intimate partner violence victimization: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 44, 8–17.
Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B., & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 65–98.
Straus, M. A. (2017). The conflict tactics scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In Physical violence in American families (pp. 49–74). New York: Routledge.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.
Swan, S. C., & Sullivan, T. P. (2009). The resource utilization of women who use violence in intimate relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(6), 940–958.
Şahin, N. H., & Durak, A. (1994). Kısa Semptom Envanteri: Türk genÇleri iÇin uyarlanması [brief symptom inventory: Adaptation for Turkish young people]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi [Turkish Psychology Journal], 9, 44–56.
Taşkale, N. (2019a, July). Suitability of behaviorist perspectives to study coping with intimate partner violence. In Oral presentation, the 16th European congress of psychology (ECP). Moscow: Russia.
Taşkale, N. (2019b). Şiddet mağduriyeti ve sağlık sonuçları arasındaki ilişkide kullanılan başa çıkma yöntemlerinin biçimlendirici rolü [The moderator role of coping strategies in the relationship between violence victimization and health outcomes] (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Istanbul University, Istanbul.
Taşkale, N., & Sertel-Berk, Ö. (2019). Eş Şiddetine Karşı Yöntemler Endeksi’nin (EŞYE) Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index (IPVSI)]. Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi [Journal of Clinical Psychology Research], 3(2), 69–91.
Taşkale, N., & Sertel-Berk, H. Ö. (2020). Şiddet Olaylarının Yakın Öncülleri Ölçeği Mağdur Formu’nun (ŞOYÖM) Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [the Turkish validity and reliability study of the proximal antecedents to violent episodes victim form (PAVEV)]. Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi [Journal of Clinical Psychology Research], 4(1), 12–33.
Taşkale, N., & Soygüt, G. (2016). Kadın sığınma evlerinde kalan şiddet mağduru kadınlar: Demografik ve sosyoekonomik bir inceleme [Shelter-residing violence victim women: A demographic and socioeconomic examination]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları [Turkish Psychological Articles], 19(Special Issue), 3–15.
Taşkale, N., & Soygüt, G. (2017). Risk factors for women’s intimate partner violence victimization: An examination from the perspective of the Schema therapy model. Journal of Family Violence, 32(1), 3–12.
Tausig, M., Subedi, J., Broughton, C., Pokimica, J., Huang, Y., & Santangelo, S. L. (2011). The continued salience of methodological issues for measuring psychiatric disorders in international surveys. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 9, 229–239.
Taymur, İ., Türkçapar, M. H., Örsel, S., Sargın, E., & Akkoyunlu, S. (2011). Kişilik İnanç Ölçeği-Kısa Formunun (KİÖ-KF) Türkçe çevirisinin üniversite öğrencilerinde geçerlilik, güvenirliği [validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the personality belief questionnaire- short form (PBQ-SF) in the university students]. Klinik Psikiyatri [Clinical Psychiatry], 14, 199–209.
Tiwari, A., Fong, D. Y. T., Yuen, K. H., Yuk, H., Pang, P., Humphreys, J., & Bullock, L. (2010). Effect of an advocacy intervention on mental health in Chinese women survivors of intimate partner violence: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 304(5), 536–543.
Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159–177.
TÜİK. (n.d.). İşgücü girdi, işgücü maliyeti ve kazanç istatistikleri [Labor force input, labor cost and earnings statistics]. Retrieved from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1008. Retreived on 16.12.2020.
Visschers, J., Jaspaert, E., & Vervaeke, G. (2017). Social desirability in intimate partner violence and relationship satisfaction reports: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(9), 1401–1420.
Wilkinson, D. L., & Hamerschlag, S. J. (2005). Situational determinants in intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 333–361.
World Health Organization Global Consultation on Violence and Health. (1996). Violence: A public health priority. Geneva: World Health Organization. (document no: WHO/EHA/ SPI.POA.2).
Zakar, R. (2012). Intimate partner violence against women and its implications for women’s health in Pakistan. Hamburg: Disserta Verlag.
Zanville, H. A. (2006). The relationship between risk and coping among survivors of intimate partner violence. (Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation). VA, USA: Goerge Mason University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taşkale, N., Berk, H.Ö.S. Coping with the Antecedents of a Violent Episode Explains More Variance than Coping with the Violent Episode: Support for Event-Based Approaches to Violence. Curr Psychol 42, 831–844 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01435-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01435-x