The current study aims to contribute to the psychometric validation of the Self Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ), a measure of self-as-context as conceptualized by Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and to contribute to a better understanding of the relationship between self-as-context, other psychological flexibility processes, and depressive symptoms. The sample (N = 266; 72.6% women) was obtained through paper-pencil and online collection methods in the general Portuguese population. Confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analyses, and convergent and divergent analyses were conducted. A mediation analysis of the effects of self-as-distinction and self-as-observer on depression symptoms through openness to experience, behavioral awareness, and valued action (while controlling for brooding) was performed using PROCESS. Items 8, 12 and 15 were removed to achieve the best model fit, which resulted in a 12-item final version of the SEQ. This version appears to be a psychometrically valid two-dimensional measure of self-as-distinction and self-as-observer, as well as a one global measure of self-as-context. Results from mediation analyses suggested that the relationship of self-as-observer and self-as-distinction with depressive symptoms is mediated by the ability to be behaviorally aware and to act according to personal values, but not by the ability to be open to experience. The behaviorally-oriented aspects of psychological flexibility seem to have particular importance on the presentation of depressive symptoms. More studies are nonetheless needed to analyze SEQ’s structure and validity in order to attain a consensual version of the questionnaire.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Anderson, K. W., & Skidmore, J. R. (1995). Empirical analysis of factors in depressive cognition: The cognitive triad inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(5), 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199509)51:5<603::AID-JCLP2270510504>3.0.CO;2-Z.
Andreotti, E., Congard, A., Le Vigouroux, S., Dauvier, B., Illy, J., Poinsot, R., & Antoine, P. (2018). Rumination and mindlessness processes: Trajectories of change in a 42-day mindfulness-based intervention. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 32(2), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-83220.127.116.11.
Atkins, P. W., & Styles, R. G. (2016). Measuring self and rules in what people say: Exploring whether self-discrimination predicts long-term wellbeing. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5(2), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.05.001.
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504.
Barnes, S. M., & Lynn, S. J. (2010). Mindfulness skills and depressive symptoms: A longitudinal study. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 30(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.2190/ic.30.1.e.
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., McHugh, L., & Hayes, S. C. (2004). Relational frame theory: Some implications for understanding and treating human psychopathology. International journal of psychology and psychological therapy, 4, 355–375.
Beck, J. S. (1964). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. New York: Guildford Press.
Bernstein, A., Hadash, Y., Lichtash, Y., Tanay, G., Shepherd, K., & Fresco, D. M. (2015). Decentering and related constructs: A critical review and metacognitive processes model. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(5), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615594577.
Bramwell, K., & Richardson, T. (2017). Improvements in depression and mental health after acceptance and commitment therapy are related to changes in Defusion and values-based action. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-017-9367-6.
Bruin, E. I., Topper, M., Muskens, J. G., Bögels, S. M., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2012). Psychometric properties of the five facets mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) in a meditating and a non-meditating sample. Assessment, 19(2), 187–197.
Ciarrochi, J., Bilich, L., & Godsell, C. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a mechanism of change in acceptance and commitment therapy. In R. A. Baer (Ed.), Assessing mindfulness and acceptance processes in clients: Illuminating the theory and practice of change (p. 51–75). Oakland: Context Press/New Harbinger Publications.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Dimaggio, G., & Shahar, G. (2017). Behavioral activation as a common mechanism of change across different orientations and disorders. Psychotherapy, 54(3), 221–224.
Dinis, A., Gouveia, J, P., Duarte, C., & Castro, T. (2011). Estudo de validação da versão Portuguesa da Escala de Respostas Ruminativas – Versão Reduzida. Psychologica, (54). https://digitalis.uc.pt/handle/10316.2/5587
Doi, S., Yokomitsu, K., & Sakano, Y. (2016). Relationships among valued action, behavioral activation, avoidance, and reinforcement in a sample of college students. Psychological Reports, 118(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294115625272.
Dozois, D. J. A., & Rnic, K. (2015). Core beliefs and self-schematic structure in depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 4, 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.008.
Drew, M. L., Dobson, K. S., & Stam, H. J. (1999). The negative self-concept in clinical depression: A discourse analysis. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 40(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086836.
Erkut, S. (2010). Developing multiple language versions of instruments for intercultural research. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00111.x.
Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2012). The role of self in acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). In L. McHugh & I. Stewart (Eds.), The self and perspective taking: Research and applications (pp. 126–142). Oakland: Hew Harbinger.
Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Luciano, C. (2013). An empirical investigation of hierarchical versus distinction relations in a self-based ACT exercise. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 13(3), 373–388.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Francis, A. W., Dawson, D. L., & Golijani-Moghaddam, N. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5(3), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.05.003.
Fresco, D. M., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., & Kennedy, S. (2007). Relationship of Posttreatment decentering and cognitive reactivity to relapse in major depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(3), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.3.447.
Godbee, M., & Kangas, M. (2020). The relationship between flexible perspective taking and emotional well-being: A systematic review of the “self-as-context” component of acceptance and commitment therapy. Behavior Therapy, 51(6), 917–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2019.12.010.
Greco, L. A., Lambert, W., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Psychological inflexibility in childhood and adolescence: Development and evaluation of the avoidance and fusion questionnaire for youth. Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3518.104.22.168.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
Hayes, S. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2017). The third wave of cognitive behavioral therapy and the rise of process-based care. World Psychiatry, 16(3), 245–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20442.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006.
Hayes, S. C., Villatte, M., Levin, M., & Hildebrandt, M. (2011). Open, aware, and active: Contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7(1), 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104449.
Hilbert, S., Goerigk, S., Padberg, F., Nadjiri, A., Übleis, A., Jobst, A., Dewald-Kaufmann, J., Falkai, P., Bühner, M., Naumann, F., & Sarubin, N. (2019). The role of self-esteem in depression: A longitudinal study. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 47(2), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465818000243.
Hinton, M. J., & Gaynor, S. T. (2010). Cognitive defusion for psychological distress, dysphoria, and low self-esteem: A randomized technique evaluation trial of vocalizing strategies. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 6(3), 164–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100906.
Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2018). The future of intervention science: Process-based therapy. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618772296.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Ishikawa, H., Mieda, T., Oshio, A., & Koshikawa, F. (2018). The relationship between decentering and Adaptiveness of response Styles in reducing depression. Mindfulness, 9(2), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0797-8.
Jaccard, J., & Wan, C, K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Lilja, J. L., Lundh, L. G., Josefsson, T., & Falkenström, F. (2013). Observing as an essential facet of mindfulness: A comparison of FFMQ patterns in meditating and non-meditating individuals. Mindfulness, 4(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0111-8.
Lo, C. S. L., Ho, S. M. Y., Yu, N. K. K., & Siu, B. P. Y. (2014). Decentering mediates the effect of ruminative and experiential self-focus on negative thinking in depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9603-2.
Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) withthe Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.
Luoma, J. B., Hayes, S. C., & Walser, R. D. (2007). Learning ACT: An acceptance & commitment therapy skills-training manual for therapists. Oakland: New Harbinger & Reno: Context Press.
Marôco, J. (2010). Análise de equações estruturais: Fundamentos teóricos, software & aplicações. Lisboa: ReportNumber, Lda.
McCracken, L. M., Barker, E., & Chilcot, J. (2014). Decentering, rumination, cognitive defusion, and psychological flexibility in people with chronic pain. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37(6), 1215–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9570-9.
Moran, O., & McHugh, L. (2019). Patterns of relational responding and a healthy self in older adolescents. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 12, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.02.002.
Moran, O., Almada, P., & McHugh, L. (2018). An investigation into the relationship between the three selves (self-as-content, self-as-process and self-as-context) and mental health in adolescents. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 7, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.01.002.
Noureen, S., & Malik, S. (2019). Conceptualized-self and depression symptoms among university students: Mediating role of cognitive fusion. Current Psychology, (2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00450-3.
Pais-Ribeiro, J, L., Honrado, A., & Leal, I. (2004). Contribuição para o estudo da adaptação portuguesa das escalas de ansiedade,depressão e stress (eads) de 21 itens de Lovibond e Lovibond. Psicologia, Saúde e Doenças, 5(2), 229–239.
Porter, A, C., Zelkowitz, R, L., Gist, D, C., & Cole, D, A. (2019). Self-evaluation and depressive Symptoms: A Latent Variable Analysis of Self-Esteem, Shame-Proneness, and Self-Criticism. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09734-1.
Pössel, P., & Thomas, S. D. (2011). Cognitive triad as mediator in the hopelessness model? A three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(3), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20751.
Rogge, R. D., Daks, J. S., Dubler, B. A., & Saint, K. J. (2019). It's all about the process: Examining the convergent validity, conceptual coverage, unique predictive validity, and clinical utility of ACT process measures. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 14, 90–102.
Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal process in cognitive therapy. New York: Basic Books.
Solem, S., Hagen, R., Wang, C. E. A., Hjemdal, O., Waterloo, K., Eisemann, M., & Halvorsen, M. (2017). Metacognitions and mindful attention awareness in depression: A comparison of currently depressed, previously depressed and never depressed individuals. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 24(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1983.
Sowislo, J. F., & Orth, U. (2013). Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028931.
Stockton, D., Kellett, S., Berrios, R., Sirois, F., Wilkinson, N., & Miles, G. (2019). Identifying the underlying mechanisms of change during acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT): A systematic review of contemporary mediation studies. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 47(3), 332–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465818000553.
Styles, R. G., & Atkins, P. W. (2018). Measuring perceptions of self and others in what people say: A replication and extension of the functional self-discrimination measure. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 9, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.06.005.
Swallow, S. R., & Kuiper, N. A. (1988). Social comparison and negative self-evaluations: An application to depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 8(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(88)90049-9.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Pearson Education Inc.
Törneke, N. (2010). Learning RFT: An introduction to relational frame theory and its clinical application. Oakland: Context Press/New Harbinger Publications.
Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(3), 247–259.
Trindade, I, A., Ferreira, N., Mendes, A, L., Ferreira, C., Dawson, D, L., & Golijani-Moghaddam, N. (2019). Comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT): Measure refinement and study of measurement invariance across Portuguese and UK samples. Manuscript under preparation.
Weiss, K. E., Hahn, A., Wallace, D. P., Biggs, B., Bruce, B. K., & Harrison, T. E. (2013). Acceptance of pain: Associations with depression, catastrophizing, and functional disability among children and adolescents in an interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38(7), 756–765. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst028.
Young, J. E. (1999). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (3rd ed.). Sarasota: Professional Resource Press.
Yu, L., McCracken, L. M., & Norton, S. (2016). The self experiences questionnaire (SEQ): Preliminary analyses for a measure of self in people with chronic pain. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.07.006.
Yu, L., Norton, S., Almarzooqi, S., & McCracken, L. M. (2017a). Preliminary investigation of self-as-context in people with fibromyalgia. British Journal of Pain, 11(3), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/2049463717708962.
Yu, L., Norton, S., & McCracken, L. M. (2017b). Change in “self-as-context” (“perspective-taking”) occurs in acceptance and commitment therapy for people with chronic pain and is associated with improved functioning. Journal of Pain, 18(6), 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.01.005.
This study had no funding.
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author declared that there is no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Carvalho, S.A., Palmeira, L., Coutinho, M. et al. Self-as-context and depressive symptoms in the general population: A further analysis of the self experiences questionnaire. Curr Psychol 41, 8897–8907 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01383-6