Skip to main content
Log in

Self-regulation of learning and conscientiousness in Portuguese and Brazilian samples

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teaching and training are becoming more student-oriented, thus requiring a higher degree of self-regulated learning, involving agency and cyclical adaptation to attain academic success and engagement in academic activities. Previous research has shown how students who set learning-oriented goals, have a greater ability to focus on cognitive tasks and establish a greater commitment to achievement, are more conscientious regarding their academic success. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify how personality characteristics like goal orientation, self-control, organization and persistence, are reflected in self-regulated learning processes, considering differences in participants from two different cultures. The participants, 402 university students (218 female and 184 male; 50.7% from Brazil and 49.3% from Portugal; mean age 21.66) were asked to answer two inventories, assessing self-regulation and conscientiousness. The results revealed that conscientiousness seems to be a personality trait which is significantly correlated with self-regulated learning and with its different phases in both the Portuguese and Brazilian samples. Moreover, significant differences were found regarding self-regulated learning overall and performance/volition processes specifically in favour of the Brazilian students. However, Portuguese students revealed to be more conscientious. The results obtained in the present study are relevant for a better understanding of the personality, contextual and cultural factors in order to promote interventions that can create conditions for students to be more active and autonomous in managing their learning processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, P. L. (1994). Intelligence, attention, and learning: Maximal and typical performance. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence: Theories of intelligence (pp. 1–27). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L., & Beier, M. E. (2003). Trait complexes, cognitive investment, and domain knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Perspectives on the psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 1–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrzejewski, C. E., Davis, H. A., Shalter Bruening, P., & Poirier, R. R. (2016). Can a self-regulated strategy intervention close the achievement gap? Exploring a classroom-based intervention in 9th grade earth science. Learning & Individual Differences, 49, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M., & Mount, M. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1–2), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, A., & Veiga Simão, A.M. (2016).Selfregulation of Learning and personality traits in college students. InF.H. Veiga (coord.), Proceedings. II Congresso Internacional Envolvimento dos Alunos na Escola: Perspetivas da Psicologia e Educação. Motivação para o desempenho académico, pp. 1024-1036. Lisboa: Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.

  • Basso, C., Graf, L.P., Lima, F. B., Schmidt, B., Bardagi, M. P. (2013). Organização de tempo e métodos de estudo: Oficinas com estudantes universitários. Revista Brasileira de Orientação Profissional, 14 (2), 277-288. Disponível em http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_issues&pid=1679-3390&lng=pt&nrm=iso

  • Bidjerano, T., & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning & Individual Differences, 17(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(6), 1057–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00253-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1348/2044-8279.002004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality traits and academic examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2005). Personality and intellectual competence. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L., Mak, M. C. K., Li, T., Wu, B. P., Chen, B. B., & Lu, H. J. (2011). Cultural adaptations to environmental variability: An evolutionary account for east-west differences. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 99–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9149-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B., & Ones, D. (2010). An other perspective on Personality: Meta-Analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212.

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Feyter, T., Caers, R., Vigna, C., & Berings, D. (2012). Unraveling the impact of the Big Five personality traits on academic performance: the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy and academic motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (1996). RIASEC types and big five traits as predictors of employment status and nature of employment. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 701–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00177.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw, S. S. W., Mervield, I., & Van Leeuwen, K. G. (2009). How are traits related to problem behavior in preschoolers? Similarities and contrats between temperament and personality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(3), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9290-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. E., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2016). Coping with university education: The relationship of time management behavior and work engagement with the five factor model aspects. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ predicting academic performance in adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam, B., Zeidner, M., & Aharon, I. (2009). Student conscientiousness, self-regulated learning, and science achievement: An explorative field study. Psychology in the Schools, 46(5), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frison, L.M.B, & Miranda, C.A. (2019). Circuito de autorregulação da aprendizagem: interlocuções com os universitários. Educação em Análise, 4 (1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.5433/1984-7939.2019v4n1p57

  • Furnham, A., Monsen, J., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Typical intellectual engagement, big five personality traits, approaches to learning and cognitive ability predictors pf academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1348/978185409X412147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • G*power (n.d.) retrieved in https://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower.html

  • Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2017). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In P. A. Alexander, D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene. Handbook of self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp 83-106). Routledge.

  • Heaven, P., Ciarrochi, J., & Vialle, W. (2007). Conscientiousnness and eysenckian psychoticism as predictors of school grades. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappe, R., & Flier, H. (2010). Using multiple and specific criteria to assess the predictive validity of the Big Five personality factors on academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 142–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestner, R., Bernieri, F., & Zuckerman, M. (1992). Self-regulation and consistency between attitudes, traits and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komorraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the big five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The big five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes da Silva, A., Duarte, A., Sá, I., & Veiga-Simão, M. (2004). Aprendizagem Auto-regulada pelo Estudante - Perspectivas Psicológicas e Educacionais. Porto: Porto Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Y.-W., & Chu, C. M. (2009). Personality traits and personal and organizational inducements: Antecedents of workaholism. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(5), 645–660. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.5.645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., Coetsier, P., De Fruyt, F., & De Maeseneer, J. (2002). Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: A five-factor model perspective. Medical Education, 36(11), 1050–1056. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01328.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacCann, C., Duckworth, A. L., & Roberts, R. D. (2009). Empirical identification of the major facets of conscientiousness. Learning & Individual Differences, 19(4), 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Schwean, V. L., Campbell, S. E., Saklofske, D. H., & Mohamed, A. A. R. (2000). Personality, self-regulation, and adaptation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 171–207). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality traits structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, C.A.G.R., & Frison, L.M.B. (2020). Autorregulação da aprendizagem: oficinas realizadas no Ensino Superior. In: L.M.B. Frison, & E. Boruchovitch (Orgs.). Autorregulação da aprendizagem: cenários, desafios, perspetivas para o contexto educativo (pp 237-252), Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Vozes.

  • Monteiro, S., Almeida, L., Cruz, J., & Franco, A. (2015). The relationship of personality, study practice and learning environments on excelent engineering students. Análise Psicológica, 33(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntalianis, F. (2010). Do personality and learning climate predict competence for learning? An investigation in a greek academic seting. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 664–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, B. P. (2002). A quantitative review of the comprehensiveness of the five-factor model in relation to popular personality inventories. Assessment, 9(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191102092010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, M., & Paunonen, S. (2007). Big five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 971–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poropat, A. E. (2013). A meta-analysis of adult-rated child personality and academic performance in primary education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Theory, research and applications (pp. 631–649). Orlando: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational implications. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiner, R. L., & Masten, A. S. (2002). Transactional links between personality and adaptation from childhood through adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 580–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00508-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiner, R. L., Masten, A. S., & Roberts, J. M. (2003). Childhood personality foreshadows adult personality and life outcomes two decades later. Journal of Personality, 71(6), 1145–1170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7106010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soley, P., & Pelissoni , A. (2020). As dimensões da autorregulação da aprendizagem no contexto do Ensino Superior. In: L.M.B. Frison, & E. Boruchovitch (Orgs.). Autorregulação da aprendizagem: cenários, desafios, perspetivas para o contexto educativo (pp 2157-236), Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Vozes.

  • Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34(4), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P., & Klingsieck, K. (2016). Academic procrastination: Psychological antecedents revisited. Australian Psychologist, 51(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmayr, R., Bipp, T., & Spinath, B. (2011). Goal orientations predict academic performance beyond intelligence and personality. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, M., & Neber, H. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated science learning in high-achieving students: Differences related to nation, gender, and grade-level. High Ability Students, 19(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130802503959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veiga Simão, A. M., & Frison, L. (2013). Auto-regulacão da aprendizagem: abordagens teóricas e desafios para as práticas em contextos educativos. Cadernos de Educação FaE/PPGE/UFPel, 45, 02–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., di Giunta, L., Milioni, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2012). Academic achievement: The unique contribution of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning beyond intelligence, personality traits, and self-esteem. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Barros.

Ethics declarations

This research has a complete compliance with Ethical Standards.

For the participants it was guaranteed the anonymity, with omission of all identifying details except age and sex. It was guaranteed the confidentiality of the individual data obtained. Participants were also informed that their participation in the study was voluntary and that they had the possibility to withdraw at any time.

The datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the research ethics committee of the institutions where the authors are affiliated.

Informed consent

Informed consent for participation was obtained before the filling out of the questionnaires.

Conflicts of interest

There are no potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barros, A., Simão, A.M.V. & Frisson, L. Self-regulation of learning and conscientiousness in Portuguese and Brazilian samples. Curr Psychol 41, 7835–7842 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01232-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01232-y

Keywords

Navigation