Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of life: Flourishing in the work context

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article aims to examine the state of the art of research on flourishing in the context of work. To achieve the objective, we conducted a systematic review using two databases from 1960 to 2019. In conducting the research, we adopted the Tranfield, Denyer, and Smart protocol, which covers three stages: i) planning the review; ii) conducting the review; iii) dissemination of knowledge. We screened 1545 studies and included 126 to synthesize. The results showed that flourishing is approached concerning derivative terms such as well-being, psychological well-being, and mental health, rather than precisely as flourishing per se. Through content analysis, we developed a typology based on three clusters: “Human Flourishing,” “Mental Health,” and “Positive Psychology.” We found that most publications focus on investigating human flourishing, not individuals’ flourishing from their work perspective, indicating that the international scientific community has hardly explored this theme. The information presented may serve as a scientific basis to develop future research, given the theme’s recent increase in interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Boyatzis, R. E., Batista-Foguet, J. M., Fernández-i-Marín, X., & Truninger, M. (2015). El competencies as a related but different characteristic of intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, 6(72). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo, B. V., & Fair, A. M. (2013). IRAMUTEQ: Free software for textual data analysis. Themes in Psychology, 21(2), 513–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalino, L. I., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2011). Tuesday in the life of a flourisher: The role of positive emotional reactivity in optimal mental health. American Psychological Association, 11(4), 938–950. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, S. M. S., Ferreira, M. C., Pereira, M. M., & Freitas, C. P. P. (2019). Florescimento no trabalho: Impacto do perdão disposicional e do suporte social emocional. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 39, 1–17.

  • Checa, I., Perales, J., & Espejo, B. (2018). Spanish validation of the flourishing scale in the general population. Curr Psychology, 37, 949–956 https://doi-org.ez22.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s12144-017-9581-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didino, D., Taran, E. A., Barysheva, G. A., & Casati, F. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the Russian version of the flourishing scale in a sample of older adults living in Siberia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(34), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1100-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Chan, Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributions to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, 3, 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., & Oishi, S. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/sll205-009-9493-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Fabio, A., & Kenny, M. (2016). E. Promoting well-being: The contribution of emotional intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, article 1182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01182.

  • Dropkin, J., Power, P., Rasul, R., Moline, J., & Kim, H. (2019). Effect of resiliency and age on musculoskeletal injuries and lost workdays in emergency medical service personnel. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 69, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60, 678–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagell, P., Reimer, J., & Nyberg, P. (2009). Whose quality of life? Ethical implications in patient-reported health outcome measurement. Value in Health, 12(4), 613–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2009). What percentage of people in Europe are flourishing and what characterises them? Briefing document for the OECD/ISQOLS meeting “measuring subjective well-being: An opportunity for NSOs?” 23/24 July, 2009. Italy: Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and / or mental health? Investigating the axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, B. J., Hunting, K. L., Guidotti, T. L., & Smith, G. S. (2005). Occupational injuries among emergency medical services personnel. Prehospital Emergency Care, 9(4), 405–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesurado, B., Crespo, R. F., Rodríguez, O., Debeljuh, P., & Carlier, S. I. (2018). The development and initial validation of a multidimensional flourishing scale. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9957-9.

  • McLellan, R., & Steward, S. (2015). Measuring children and young people's wellbeing in the school context. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.889659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neil, A. L., Carr, V. J., Mackinnon, A., Foley, D. L., & Morgan, V. A. (2018). Health-related quality of life in people living with psychotic illness and factors associated with its variation. Value in Health, 21(8), 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.02.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okoro, K. I., & Urama, E. C. (2016). Value-based health care. Value in Health, 19(3), A18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzeschi, L., Bucci, O., & Di Fabio, A. (2018). High entrepreneurship, leadership, and professionalism (HELP): A new resource for workers in the 21st century. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, article 1480.

  • Payton, A. R. (2009). Mental health, mental illness, and psychological distress: Same continuum or distinct phenomena? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50, 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prainsack, B., & Buyx, A. (2018). The value of work: Addressing the future of work through the lens of solidarity. Bioethics, 32(9), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12507.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2005). Rank-normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categories. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450410159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarshar, M., Farley, F., Fiorello, C. A., & DuCette, J. (2019). T behavior: Psychological implications of thrill-seeking/risk-taking. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00557-7.

  • Savickas, M. L. (2011). Career Counseling. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). The Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES). The Netherlands: Department of Social and Organizational Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, N. S., & Loi, N. M. (2014). Connections between emotional intelligence and workplace flourishing. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 134–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scimago Journal & Country Rank. (2019). SJR. https://www.scimagojr.com/ [accessed October 30, 2019].

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2001). Positive psychology: An introduction: Reply. American Psychologist, 56(1), 89–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding Y, Rousseau R, Wolfram D. Measuring Scholarly Impact. Cham: Springer.

  • Wang, Z. Y., Liu, H. B., Yu, H. J., Wu, Y. W., Chang, S., & Wang, L. (2017). Associations between occupational stress, burnout and well-being among manufacturing workers: Mediating roles of psychological capital and self-esteem. BMC Psychiatry, 17(364), 364. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1533-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, E. L. Y., Cheung, A. W. L., & Wong, A. Y. K. (2019). Regulatory profile of health-related quality of life for Hong Kong general population using preference-based instrument EQ-5D-5L. Value in Health, 22(8), 916–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, M. K., She, Z. L., Cai, Z. J., Huang, Z., Xiang, Q., Wang, P., & Zhu, F. (2018). Examining a sequential mediation model of Chinese University Students' well-being: A career construction perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, article 593.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Editor F. Richard Ferraro and the anonymous reviewers for the excellent suggestions. Receive our sincere thanks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudimar Pereira da Veiga.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fabricio, A., Kaczam, F., Obregon, S.L. et al. Quality of life: Flourishing in the work context. Curr Psychol 41, 6987–7002 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01203-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01203-3

Keywords

Navigation