Skip to main content
Log in

When studying becomes an obsession: The Studyholism Inventory – Extended Version (SI-15)

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studyholism is a new potential clinical condition characterized by high levels of obsessive-compulsive symptoms that might also be associated with high study engagement, which is a positive study-related behavior. Hence, the Studyholism Inventory (SI-10) has been created to evaluate both Studyholism and Study Engagement. We aim to expand the measurement of Studyholism by proposing an extended version of the SI-10, which evaluates Studyholism obsessive symptoms (like the SI-10), but also compulsive symptoms and social impairment. We created a pool of 45 items covering three hypothetical factors: Obsessions, Compulsions, and Social Impairment. Then, through Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis on 1047 Italian University students, we confirmed the three-factor solution for a 15-item version. The SI-15 showed a good fit (CFI = .97; RMSEA = .05), good internal consistency, and good convergent and divergent validity. Given that Studyholism is a new emerging construct, the SI-15 could be a useful instrument in further research to address its features and correlates. It could also be used to conduct an extended evaluation of students scoring high on the Studyholism subscale of the SI-10 to evaluate if they might benefit from a clinical interview and an intervention to reduce their obsessions and/or compulsions regarding studying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). DSM-5. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, C. S. (2014). Workaholism: An overview and current status of the research. Journal of Behavioural Addictions, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.2.2013.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a work addiction scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Gjertsen, S. R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013). The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five factor model of personality. Journal Behavioral Addictions, 2(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.2.2013.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Hetland, J., Kravina, L., Jensen, F., & Pallesen, S. (2014). The prevalence of workaholism: A survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees. PLoS One, 9(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atroszko, P. A. (2018). Commentary on: The Bergen study addiction scale: Psychometric properties of the Italian version. A pilot study. Theoretical and methodological issues in the research on study addiction with relevance to the debate on conceptualising behavioural addictions. Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna, 3, 276–282. https://doi.org/10.15557/PiPK.2018.0034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atroszko, P. A., Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., & Pallesen, S. (2015). Study addiction – a new area of psychological study: Conceptualization, assessment, and preliminary empirical findings. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billieux, J., Schimmenti, A., Khazaal, Y., Maurage, P., & Heernen, A. (2015). Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(3), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. A., Michel, J. S., Zhdanova, L., Pui, S. Y., & Baltes, B. B. (2016). All work and no play? A meta-analytic examination of the correlates and outcomes of workaholism. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1836–1873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314522301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. A., Smith, R. W., & Haynes, N. J. (in press). The multidimensional workaholism scale: Linking the conceptualization and measurement of workaholism. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000484.

  • Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J. S., Kendall, P. C., Franklin, M. E., Hudson, J. L., & Pimentel, S. S. (2004). Obsessing/worrying about the overlap between obsessive-compulsive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder in youth. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(6), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giannini, M., & Loscalzo, Y. (2016). Workaholism: Health risk and prevention in the organizations. In A. Di Fabio (Ed.), Neuroticism: Characteristics, impact on job performance and health outcomes (pp. 49–60). New York: Nova Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., Demetrovics, Z., & Atroszko, P. A. (2018). Ten myths about work addiction. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(4), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.05.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardefelt-Winther, D. (2015). Commentary on: Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. Problems with atheoretical and confirmatory research approaches in the study of behavioral addictions. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(3), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.019.

  • Kline, R. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korb, K. (2012). Adopting or adapting an instrument. Retrieved March 29, 2018, from: http://korbedpsych.com/R09aAdopt.html

  • Loscalzo, Y. (2019). Heavy study investment in college students: Studyholism and study engagement prevalence. Applied Psychology Bulletin, 286, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.26387/bpa.286.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loscalzo, Y., & Giannini, M. (2015). Workaholism: Cosa c’è di nuovo? [Workaholism: What is new?]. Counseling - Digital Journal, 8(3).

  • Loscalzo, Y., & Giannini, M. (2017a). Clinical conceptualization of workaholism: A comprehensive model. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(4), 306–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386617734299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loscalzo, Y., & Giannini, M. (2017b). Studyholism or study addiction? A comprehensive model for a possible new clinical condition. In A. M. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychological research (pp. 19–37). New York: Nova Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loscalzo, Y., & Giannini, M. (2018a). Response to: Theoretical and methodological issues in the research on study addiction with relevance to the debate on conceptualising behavioural addictions: Atroszko (2018). Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna, 18(4), 426–430. https://doi.org/10.15557/PiPK.2018.0051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loscalzo, Y., & Giannini, M. (2018b). Problematic overstudying: Studyholism or study addiction?. Commentary on: Ten myths about work addiction (Griffiths et al., 2018). Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(4), 867–870. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Loscalzo, Y., & Giannini, M. (2018c). The Bergen study addiction scale: Psychometric properties of the Italian version. A pilot study. Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna, 18(3), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.15557/PiPK.2018.0033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loscalzo, Y., & Giannini, M. (2019). Heavy study investment in Italian College students. An analysis of Loscalzo and Giannini’s (2017) studyholism comprehensive model. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 489. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00489.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Loscalzo, Y., & Giannini, M. (2020). Studyholism inventory (SI-10): A short instrument for evaluating study obsession within the heavy study investment framework. Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 16(4), 688–706. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i4.1911

  • Loscalzo, Y., Giannini, M., & Golonka, K. (2018). Studyholism inventory (SI-10): Psychometric properties of the Italian and polish versions. In T. M. Ostrowski, B. Piasecka, & K. Gerc (Eds.), Resilience and health. Challenges for an individual, family and community (pp. 205–217). Krakow: Jagiellonian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. (1971). Confession of a workaholic. New York: Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinones, C., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Addiction to work. A critical review of the workaholism construct and recommendations for assessment. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 53(10), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20150923-04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., Thissen, D., Revicki, D. A., Weiss, D. J., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health related quality of life item banks: Plans for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5), S22–S31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., Junnarkar, M., & Kaur, J. (2016). Norms for test construction. In K. Sing, K. Junnarkar, & J. Kahur (Eds.), Measure of positive psychology, development and validation (pp. 17–34). India: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, S. (2012). Workaholism: A review. Addiction, Research and Theory, S6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.S6-001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, S., Lisha, N., & Griffiths, M. (2011). Prevalence of the addictions: A problem of the majority or the minority? Evaluation and the Health Professions, 34(1), 3–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278710380124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vilella, C., Martinotti, G., Di Nicola, M., Cassano, M., La Torre, G., Gliubizzi, M. D., et al. (2011). Behavioural addiction in adolescents and young adults: Results from a prevalence study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-010-9206-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Data Availability Statement

The datasets of the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and for research purposes only.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Yura Loscalzo. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yura Loscalzo, while Marco Giannini critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yura Loscalzo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee of the Department of Health Sciences, reference number 153913, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix. Studyholism DSM-like tentative criteria

Appendix. Studyholism DSM-like tentative criteria

  1. A.

    Persistent and recurrent problematic studying behaviors leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, including health-related problems, as indicated by the individual exhibiting one or both of the following in a 6-month period:

  1. (1)

    Study-related obsessions, defined as recurrent and persistent thoughts related to study that in most individuals cause marked anxiety or distress, which might be experienced as unwanted, and that the individual might attempt to ignore or suppress.

  2. (2)

    Study-related compulsions, defined as repetitive studying behaviors (e.g., studying nearly all the evenings and weekends) or study-related rituals (e.g., taking all the exams with the same outfit in order to avoid the risk of a bad grade) that the individual feels driven to perform in response to his or her study-related obsessions or according to a rigid rule. They are excessive and aimed at reducing anxiety or distress or at preventing a feared event (e.g., failing an exam).

  1. B.

    Studyholism symptoms are not attributable to the physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, a medication) or another medical condition.

  2. C.

    The disturbance is not better explained by the symptoms of another mental disorder (e.g., study-related compulsion is not a consequence of an obsession not study-related, that is typical of the obsessive-compulsive disorder; overstudying is not explainable by obsessive-compulsive personality disorder; studyholism behaviors are not a consequence of fear of negative evaluation in the context of social anxiety disorder; overstudying is not due to a manic episode).

Specify if:

With high study engagement (or engaged studyholic): the individual finds study pleasurable, and he/she has a high level of energy while studying;

With average study engagement: the individual has neither high nor low study engagement;

With low study engagement (or disengaged studyholic): the individual does not find study pleasurable, and he/she has a low level of energy while studying.

Specify if:

With academic impairment: the individual gets bad grades, he/she has difficulty in doing the required school homework or exams (e.g., he/she takes few exams in a year but with good grades), or he/she thinks about dropping out from school/university.

With social impairment: the individual experiences relationship problems with the family, friends, classmates, teachers, or the partner.

With academic and social impairment: the individual has both academic and social impairment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loscalzo, Y., Giannini, M. When studying becomes an obsession: The Studyholism Inventory – Extended Version (SI-15). Curr Psychol 41, 6867–6879 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01168-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01168-3

Keywords

Navigation