Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Naturally mindful? The role of mindfulness facets in the relationship between nature relatedness and subjective well-being

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nature relatedness refers to the cognitive-affective relationship with natural environments. Mindfulness is described as non-judgmental attention to the present moment and is a multi-dimensional construct consisting of interacting facets. This study aimed to clarify the mechanisms through which nature relatedness and mindfulness contribute to subjective well-being. Participants were 250 university students (Mage = 20.67, SD = 1.99, 82.4% female) who completed measures of nature relatedness, the five facets of mindfulness, positive and negative affect and life satisfaction. Mediation analyses revealed that of the five facets of mindfulness, only Non-Reactivity and Observing partially mediated the positive relationship between nature relatedness and positive affect, and fully mediated the positive relationship between nature relatedness and life satisfaction. Only Non-Reactivity was found to fully mediate the negative relationship between nature relatedness and negative affect. Findings suggest that when creating nature-based mindfulness interventions, it may be clinically useful develop skills that target mindfulness through Non-Reactivity and Observing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Joseph Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarships – Master’s).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Sadowski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (McGill University Research Ethics Board II, REB File #: 178–0918) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Figures Depicting Mediation Models

Fig. 1
figure 1

Model depicting the mediational role of non-reactivity on the association between nature relatedness and positive affect. *p < .05, ***p < .001

Fig. 2
figure 2

Model depicting the mediational role of non-reactivity on the association between nature relatedness and life satisfaction. *p < .05, ***p < .001

Fig. 3
figure 3

Model depicting the mediational role of non-reactivity on the association between nature relatedness and negative affect. *p < .05, ***p < .001

Fig. 4
figure 4

Model depicting the mediational role of observing on the association between nature relatedness and positive affect. *p < .05, ***p < .001

Fig. 5
figure 5

Model depicting the mediational role of observing on the association between nature relatedness and life satisfaction. *p < .05, **p < .01 ***p < .001

Fig. 6
figure 6

Model depicting the mediational role of observing on the association between nature relatedness and negative affect. ***p < .001

Fig. 7
figure 7

Model depicting the mediational role of non-judging on the association between nature relatedness and positive affect. **p < .01, ***p < .001

Fig. 8
figure 8

Model depicting the mediational role of non-judging on the association between nature relatedness and life satisfaction. *p < .05, ***p < .001

Fig. 9
figure 9

Model depicting the mediational role of non-judging on the association between nature relatedness and negative affect. ***p < .001

Fig. 10
figure 10

Model depicting the mediational role of describing on the association between nature relatedness and positive affect. *p < .05, ***p < .001

Fig. 11
figure 11

Model depicting the mediational role of describing on the association between nature relatedness and life satisfaction. *p < .05, ***p < .001

Fig. 12
figure 12

Model depicting the mediational role of describing on the association between nature relatedness and negative affect. *p < .05 ***p < .001

Fig. 13
figure 13

Model depicting the mediational role of acting with awareness on the association between nature relatedness and positive affect. ***p < .001

Fig. 14
figure 14

Model depicting the mediational role of acting with awareness on the association between nature relatedness and life satisfaction. *p < .05, ***p < .001

Fig. 15
figure 15

Model depicting the mediational role of acting with awareness on the association between nature relatedness and negative affect. ***p < .001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadowski, I., Böke, N., Mettler, J. et al. Naturally mindful? The role of mindfulness facets in the relationship between nature relatedness and subjective well-being. Curr Psychol 41, 5358–5373 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01056-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01056-w

Keywords

Navigation