Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychometric and conceptual analysis of the resilience at university scale

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tested the confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) model of the Resilience at University (RAU) scale and considered the conceptual properties of the scale relative to students transitioning from the adolescent-to-adulthood psychological developmental stage. Survey data were obtained from 808 Australian undergraduate business students. Using the holdout sample (sub-sample B), the factorial structure of the set of 19 items loading onto a 7-factor structure demonstrated very good model fit and all factor loadings were significant. Evidence confirming the internal consistency of the scales was more equivocal. While the CFA confirms the validity of the seven-factor structure, the Cronbach’s alpha indicates issues within four of the seven subscales. It was identified that changes to four of the dimensions would help ensure that the RAU demonstrates both the validity and the reliability required for an effective scale for its intended population. To address the reliability issues, several of the subscales will benefit from additional items to better explicate the concepts concerned and to improve reliability. A key challenge, however, of developing a resilience measure for use with university students is the transitional psychological developmental stage of the undergraduate cohort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). Amos 22™ users guide. Chicago: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P., Day, R., & Salas, E. (2006). Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations. Health Services Research, 41(4 Pt 2), 1576–1598.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, I. K., & Szabo, P. (2005). Brief coaching for lasting solutions. New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethlehem, J. (2009). Applied survey methods: A statistical perspective. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruso, J. C. (2000). Reliability generalisations of the NEO personality scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 236–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 679–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Sturman, E. D. (2013). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. L., Flint-Taylor, J., & Pearn, M. (2013). Building resilience for success: A resource for managers and organizations. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté, J. E. (2009). Identity formation and self-development in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 266–304). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotman, C. W., & Berchtold, N. C. (2002). Exercise: A behavioral intervention to enhance brain health and plasticity. Trends in Neurosciences, 25(6), 295–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croccetti, E. (2017). Identity formation in adolescence: The dynamic of forming and consolidating identity commitments. Child Development Perspectives, 11(2), 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development: Theory And Applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ershadi, M., Davis, P., & Newaz, M. T. (2020). Systematic review of resilience measures: Construction management graduates’ perspective. International journal of construction management, 1-14.

  • Field, J., & Morgan-Klein, N. (2010). Studenthood and identification: Higher education as a liminal transition space. In Leeds: Educationline/British index. 40th annual SCUTREA conference, University of Warwick.

  • Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 745–774.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D. (2012). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 367(1599), 2213–2223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2012). Mechanisms of social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 287–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, N. L., Howard, A. L., & Maggs, J. L. (2011). Rise and fall of sleep quantity and quality with student experiences across the first year of university. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(2), 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W. (2012). Missing data - analysis and design. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haddadi, P., & Besharat, M. A. (2010). Resilience, vulnerability and mental health. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 639–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Rabin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (Seventh ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, S., Weiss, M., Newman, A., & Hoegl, M. (2020). Resilience in the Workplace: A Multilevel Review and Synthesis. Applied Psychology, 69(3), 913-959. 

  • Heaven, P. C. L. (2001). The social psychology of adolescence (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, R. K., Kogan, L. R., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). A relibility generalisation study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(404–420), 404–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdsworth, S., Turner, M. E., & Scott-Young, C. M. (2018). … not drowning, waving. Resilience and university: A student perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1837–1853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T. A., Schriesheim, C. A., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., & Williams, L. J. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 667–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corporation. (2013a). IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 23.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corporation. (2013b). IBM AMOS for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijntema, R. C., Burger, Y. D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2019). Reviewing the labyrinth of psychological resilience: Establishing criteria for resilience-building programs. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 71(4), 288–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D., & Wilton, N. (2016). Developing career management competencies among undergraduates and the role of work-integrated learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(3), 266–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (2008). Teacher-student relationships which promote resilience at school: A micro-level analysis of student's views. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 36(4), 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Third ed.). New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition, 77(6), 1121–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (2006). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, K. A., & DeRosier, M. E. (2012). Factors promoting positive adaptation and resilience during transition to college. Psychology, 3(12A), 1215–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. H., Nam, S. K., Kim, A. R., Kim, B., Lee, M. Y., & Lee, S. M. (2013). Resilience: A meta-analytic approach. Journal of Counseling and Development, 91, 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lever, J., Krzywinski, M., & Altman, N. (2017). Principal component analysis. Nature Methods, 14, 641–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Davies, D. R., Westerman, S. J., & Stammers, R. B. (2000). Human performance: Cogntion, stress and individual differences. Hove: Pychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (2013). Modern test theory. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology. Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 118–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell, B. (2005). Solution-focused therapy (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, A. N. (2003). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. D. A., Summerfeldt, L. J., Hogan, M. J., & Majeski, S. A. (2004). Emotional intelligence and academic success: Examining the transition from high school to university. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V., & Goodman, A. (2007). Researching protective and promotive factors in mental health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(4), 703–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riediger, M., & Klipker, K. (2013). Emotion regulation in adolescence. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), The handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 187–202). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J., Jones, S., Hayes, P., & Turner, M. (2019). Building student resilience for graduate work readiness. In A. Diver (Ed.), Employability via higher education: Sustainability as scholarship. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G. C. (2018). The age of adolescence. The Lancet Child & Adolsecent Health, 2(3), 223–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (1998). On the development of adult metacognition. In M. C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from Educational Psychology (pp. 89–106). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastion, C., Burnett, S., & Blakemore, S. J. (2008). Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12(11), 441–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. M., & Edwardsm, M. C. (2016). Reliability and model fit. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 976–985.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, A. (2017). An introduction to Developmental Psychology (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiliotopoulou, G. (2009). Reliability reconsidered: Cronbach's alpha and paediatric assessment in occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56, 150–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(2), 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swailes, S., & McIntyre-Bhatty, T. (2002). The “Belbin” team role inventory: Reinterpreting reliability estimates. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(6), 529–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, P. J., & Lee, D. R. (1999). Support and commitment factors of project teams. Engineering Management Journal, 11(3), 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, G. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (Seventh ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabibnia, G., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Fairness and cooperation are rewarding: Evidence from social cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 90–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M., Holdsworth, S., & Scott-Young, C. M. (2017a). Resilience at university: The development and testing of a new measure. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M., Scott-Young, C. M., & Holdsworth, S. (2017b). Promoting wellbeing at university: The role of resilience for students of the built environment. Construction Management and Economics, 35(11–12), 707–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M., Scott-Young, C., & Holdsworth, S. (2019a). Developing the resilient project professional: Examining the student experience. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(3), 716–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M., Scott-Young, C.M, & Holdsworth. (2019b). Resilience and wellbeing: A multi-country exploration of construction management students. International Journal of Construction Management. 1–16.

  • Voss, K. E., Stem, D. E. J., & Fotopoulos, S. (2000). A comment on the relationship between coefficient alpha and scale characteristics. Marketing Letters, 11(2), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F., & Grimm, K. J. (2014). Advanced psychometrics: Confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory, and the study of measurement invariance. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 534–570). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Windle, G. (2011). What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 21(2), 152–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winwood, P. C., Colon, R., & McEwen, K. (2013). A practical measure of workplace resilience: Developing the resilience at work scale. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55(10), 1205–1212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. A. (2013). More than meets the eye: The role of employee wellbeing in organizational research. In P. A. Linley, S. Harrington, & N. Garcea (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work (pp. 143–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2018). Grace under pressure in educational contexts: Emotional intelligence, stress and coping. In K. V. Keefer, J. D. A. Parker, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in education: Integrating research with practice (pp. 83–110). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., & Saklofske, D. (1996). Adaptive and maladaptive coping. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 505–531). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, P., & Iwanski, A. (2014). Emotion regulation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood and middle adulthood: Age differences, gender differences, and emotion-specific developmental variations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(2), 182–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia

    Michelle Turner

  2. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Paul Bowen

  3. RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

    Peter Hayes & Jacinta Ryan

  4. University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Peter Hayes & Jacinta Ryan

  5. Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

    Jacinta Ryan

Authors
  1. Michelle Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Bowen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Hayes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jacinta Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Turner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turner, M., Bowen, P., Hayes, P. et al. Psychometric and conceptual analysis of the resilience at university scale. Curr Psychol 41, 5220–5235 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00995-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00995-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation