Abstract
There is a paucity of research analyzing sexting behaviors in adults aged 25 and older. The majority of research into sexting focuses on emerging adult populations and adolescents. While sexting has been studied in regard to relational attachment and motivations to sext, little is known about how these constructs are associated with older adults’ sexting behaviors and how they relate to the type of sext message sent. To that end, the current study sought to predict the type of sext message (image or text only) sent based on relational attachment and sexting motivations. A significant logistic regression model was found (χ2(6) = 51.97, p < .001), with relational anxiety and body image reinforcement being significant predictors of adults sending a partially and/or nude image in a sext message. Interestingly, gender was not a significant predictor. Gender not being a significant predictor differs from research into emerging adult relational attachment styles and sexting behaviors. Individuals who sexted for body image reinforcement were more likely to send an image as a sext message. Those who were higher on relational anxiety were less likely to send an image as a sext message.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The logistic regression was conducted including all participants (including those under 25, n = 63) and the results were virtually identical (χ2(6) = 54.76, p < .001, Nagelkerke R2 = .21, ΔNagelkerke R2 = −.01) and the same predictors with the same odds ratios (SMQ-BIR (OR = 2.74 [1.65, 4.56], p < .001) and ECR-12 Anxiety (OR = 0.75 [0.62, 0.91], p = .004).
References
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244.
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., & Chirumbolo, A. (2017a). Psychometric properties of the sexting motivations questionnaire for adolescents and young adults. Rassegna di Psicologia, 33(3), 5–18 http://rassegnadipsicologia.it/index.php/rdp/article/view/88.
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., & Chirumbolo, A. (2017b). Sexting as the mirror on the wall: Body-esteem attribution, media models, and objectified-body consciousness. Journal of Adolescence, 61, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.10.006.
Choi, H., Van Ouytsel, J., & Temple, J. R. (2016). Association between sexting and sexual coercion among female adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 53, 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.10.005.
Currin, J. M., & Hubach, R. D. (2019). Motivations for non-University based adults who sext their relationship partners. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, Advanced Online Copy. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2018.1526837.
Currin, J. M., Jayne, C. N., Hammer, T. R., Brim, T., & Hubach, R. D. (2016). Explicitly pressing send: Impact of sexting on relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 44(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2016.1145086.
Currin, J. M., Hubach, R. D., Sanders, C., & Hammer, T. R. (2017). Sexting leads to “risky” sex? An analysis of sexting behaviors in a non-University based adult population. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43(7), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2016.1246390.
Dir, A. L., & Cyders, M. A. (2015). Risks, risk factors, and outcomes associated with phone and internet sexting among university students in the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(6), 1675–1684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0370-7.
Dir, A. L., Coskunpinar, A., Steiner, J. L., & Cyders, M. A. (2013). Understanding differences in sexting behaviors across gender, relationship status, and sexual identity, and the role of expectancies in sexting. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(8), 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023098825964.
Drouin, M., & Landgraff, C. (2012). Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.015.
Drouin, M., & Tobin, E. (2014). Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: Relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.001.
Drouin, M., Vogel, K. N., Surbey, A., & Stills, J. R. (2013). Let’s talk about sexting, baby: Computer-mediated sexual behaviors among young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A25–A30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.030.
Drouin, M., Tobin, E., & Wygant, K. (2014). "Love the way you lie": Sexting deception in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 542–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.047.
Drouin, M., Ross, J., & Tobin, E. (2015). Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression? Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.001.
Drouin, M., Coupe, M., & Temple, J. R. (2017). Is sexting good for your relationship? It depends …. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.018.
Edlund, J. E., Lange, K. M., Sevene, A. M., Umansky, J., Beck, C. D., & Bell, D. J. (2017). Participant crosstalk: Issues when using the mechanical Turk. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 13(3), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.13.3.p174.
Englander, E. (2012). Low risk associated with most teenage sexting: A study of 617 18-year-olds. Massachusetts Aggression Reduction Center: Bridgewater State University.
Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011). The experiences in close relationships—Relationship structures questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022898.
Galovan, A. M., Drouin, M., & McDaniel, B. T. (2018). Sexting profiles in the United States and Canada: Implications for individual and relationship well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.017.
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93.
Hertlein, K. M., Shadid, C., & Steelman, S. M. (2015). Exploring perceptions of acceptability of sexting in same-sex, bisexual, heterosexual relationships and communities. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 14(4), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2014.960547.
Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., & Mellor, D. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007.
Lafontaine, M.-F., Brassard, A., Lussier, Y., Valois, P., Shaver, P. R., & Johnson, S. M. (2016). Selecting the best items for a short-form of the experiences in close relationships questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000243.
Lemke, R., & Merz, S. (2018). The prevalence and gratification of nude self-presentation of men who have sex with men in online-dating environments: Attracting attention, empowerment, and self-verification. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 21(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0691.
Levine, D. (2013). Sexting: A terrifying health risk ... or the new normal for young adults? Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 257–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.003.
McDaniel, B. T., & Drouin, M. (2015). Sexting among married couples: Who is doing it, and are they more satisfied? Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(11), 628–634. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0334.
Mortensen, K., & Hughes, T. L. (2018). Comparing Amazon’s mechanical Turk platform to conventional data collection methods in the health and medical research literature. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33(4), 533–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4246-0.
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk:Understanding mechanical Turk as a participant Pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598.
Parker, T. S., Blackburn, K. M., Perry, M. S., & Hawks, J. M. (2013). Sexting as an intervention: Relationship satisfaction and motivation considerations. American Journal of Family Therapy, 41(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2011.635134.
Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(12), 1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3.
Ramsey, S. R., Thompson, K. L., McKenzie, M., & Rosenbaum, A. (2016). Psychological research in the internet age: The quality of web-based data. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.049.
Redmiles, E. M., Kross, S., & Mazurek, M. L. (2019). How well do my results generalize? Comparing security and privacy survey results from mturk, web, and telephone samples. In 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), Vol. 00 (pp. 227–244). IEEE.
Samimi, P., & Alderson, K. G. (2014). Sexting among undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.027.
Smith, N. A., Sabat, I. E., Martinez, L. R., Weaver, K., & Xu, S. (2015). A convenient solution: Using MTurk to sample from hard-to-reach populations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.29.
Trub, L., & Starks, T. J. (2017). Insecure attachments: Attachment, emotional regulation, sexting and condomless sex among women in relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.052.
Van Ouytsel, J., Ponnet, K., & Walrave, M. (2018). Cyber dating abuse victimization among secondary school students from a lifestyle-routine activities theory perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(17), 2767–2776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516629390.
Weisskirch, R. S., Drouin, M., & Delevi, R. (2017). Relational anxiety and sexting. Journal of Sex Research, 54(6), 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1181147.
Wysocki, D. K., & Childers, C. D. (2011). "let my fingers do the talking": Sexting and infidelity in cyberspace. Sexuality & Culture, 15, 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9091-4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The corresponding author, on behalf of all authors, reports there are no conflicts of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board at Texas Tech University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Currin, J.M., Golden, B.L. & Hubach, R.D. Predicting type of sext message sent in adults 25 and older using motivations to sext and relational attachment. Curr Psychol 41, 1526–1533 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00680-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00680-w